| Literature DB >> 36164504 |
Hang Yao1, Ming Wu1, Liwei Lin2, Zhonglian Wu1, Minjun Bae2, Sumin Park2, Shuli Wang3, Wang Zhang1, Jiefeng Gao1, Dongan Wang4, Yuanzhe Piao2,5.
Abstract
The wound healing process is usually susceptible to different bacterial infections due to the complex physiological environment, which significantly impairs wound healing. The topical application of antibiotics is not desirable for wound healing because the excessive use of antibiotics might cause bacteria to develop resistance and even the production of super bacteria, posing significant harm to human well-being. Wound dressings based on adhesive, biocompatible, and multi-functional hydrogels with natural antibacterial agents have been widely recognized as effective wound treatments. Hydrogels, which are three-dimensional (3D) polymer networks cross-linked through physical interactions or covalent bonds, are promising for topical antibacterial applications because of their excellent adhesion, antibacterial properties, and biocompatibility. To further improve the healing performance of hydrogels, various modification methods have been developed with superior biocompatibility, antibacterial activity, mechanical properties, and wound repair capabilities. This review summarizes hundreds of typical studies on various ingredients, preparation methods, antibacterial mechanisms, and internal antibacterial factors to understand adhesive hydrogels with natural antibacterial agents for wound dressings. Additionally, we provide prospects for adhesive and antibacterial hydrogels in biomedical applications and clinical research.Entities:
Keywords: Adhesive hydrogels; Antibacterial agents; Wound dressings; Wound healing
Year: 2022 PMID: 36164504 PMCID: PMC9508611 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Today Bio ISSN: 2590-0064
Fig. 1The development of antibacterial adhesive hydrogels over the past few years [34,35,38,40,51,52,[57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81]].
Comparisons of different adhesive mechanisms for hydrogels.
| Hydrogel | Adhesion type | Features | Adhesion strength (kPa) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCS/PAM | PDA | Strong and repeatable tissue adhesion, good tensile property (1154%), antibacterial ability | 27.2 | [ |
| PAA/CS | TA | Skin affinity, highly stretchable, self-recovery capacity, antifatigue property | 20 | [ |
| PVA/Graphene | PDA | Good tensile strength (1.174 MPa), excellent elongation (331%), recyclable, antibacterial ability | 1.735 | [ |
| CS/Gelatin | DA | Sustained drug release, anti-infection capacity, antibacterial ability | >20 | [ |
| OHA | DA | Tissue adhesion, self-healing property | 15.2 | [ |
| Gelatin | DA | No cytotoxicity, tunability | 43 | [ |
| Gelatin | TA | Self-healing property | 36 | [ |
| PAA | TA | Repeatable, conductive, self-solidified, antibacterial ability | 25 | [ |
| PEG | Amidation | Antibacterial ability, controllable gelation time | 20 | [ |
| Gelatin | Amidation | Antibacterial ability, biocompatibility | 4.8–56 | [ |
| TPU/PAAm | Hydrogen bonding | Self-healing property, compliance | 9.46 | [ |
| PLS/CS/RSF | Imine linkage | Biodegradability, biocompatibility, low immunogenicity | 70 | [ |
| NB/CMC/CMC | Imine linkage | Biocompatibility, biodegradability, antibacterial ability | 56.85–97.65 | [ |
Advantages and disadvantages of adhesive.
| Adhesion mechanism | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Catechol-Quinone Balance | Durable adhesiveness: hemostasis (seal to stop bleeding, chitosan); antibacterial (EPL, chitosan); antioxidant | Toxic oxidant; not easy to store |
| Hydrogen Bond | Reversible adhesion and not affected by the surface chemistry | Limited adhesion |
| Amide Bond | Injectable; | Limited adhesion |
| Imine Bond | Injectable; | Limited adhesion |
| Topology | Wet tissue adhesion: act on any wet material when triggered by environmental stimuli | Environmental irritation may be harmful |
| Static Electricity | Wet adhesion; hemostasis (BIL) | Positive charge may affect cells |
Fig. 2(a) Design strategy for the preparation of PDA-clay-PAM hydrogel. (b) A piece of hydrogel directly adhered to a human arm and a pedometer was attached to the hydrogel, then the pedometer was detached from the arm after a movement and the hydrogel was easily peeled off from the skin without causing any harm or allergies and no residue was observed. Reproduced with permission [38]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic diagram of the preparation of multifunctional PVA-G-PDA-AgNPs composite hydrogel. (d) Adhesive strength of the PVA-G-PDA-AgNPs hydrogels on various substrates and the effect of concentration of DA on adhesion strength to different substrates. Reproduced with permission [88]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (e) Mechanisms of self-healing behavior of oxidizing polyacrylic acid-polyvinyl alcohol-borax. f) Mechanisms of the reversible adhesion and repeatable adhesive strength values of O-PAA-PVA-B to multiple substrates. Reproduced with permission [95]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 3(a) Covalent and non-covalent bonds in the hydrogel network and the strong hydrogen bonds between water and glycerol firmly locked moisture in the hydrogel. (b) The adhesion of the hydrogel to various materials. Reproduced with permission [97]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier. (c) Illustration of the preparation of the injectable and multi cross-linked double-network AF127/HA-ADH/OHA-Dop hydrogel and the application in full-thickness skin wound healing. (d) Average lap shear strength of different hydrogels to porcine skin tissues (n = 3) and schematic illustration of the hydrogel's adhesion to biological tissues involving covalent bonds to different nucleophiles and the generation of hydrogen bonds. Reproduced with permission [49]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 4(a) Schematic diagram of self-adjustable and photo-reversible topological adhesion of a PA hydrogel to a charged hydrogel. (b) Adhesion behaviors of hydrogels with different charges to the surface of a piece of pork liver tissue and adhesion of the PA hydrogel to biological tissues and hydrogels. Reproduced with permission [107]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH. (c) Schematic diagram of the adhesion mechanism of amphoteric polyelectrolyte (PA) hydrogels. (d) Adhesion energies at different pH, UV intensities, time, penetration time, adhesion time, and detaching time. Reproduced with permission [110]. Copyright 2015, Wiley-VCH.
Fig. 5Schematic illustration of natural antibacterial agents that impart superior broad-spectrum antibacterial activity to the hydrogel wound dressings.
Introduction and comparison of various natural antibacterial factors.
| Antibacterial mechanism | Advantages | Disadvantages | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silver-zeolite | Metal ions contact sterilization and catalytic sterilization. | Strong affinity that can work both in the presence and absence of oxygen. | High cost |
| Silver-phosphate | Slow-release action and photocatalytic action. | Strong adsorption function, large specific surface area, nontoxicity, stable chemical properties. | High cost |
| Silver-soluble glass | Slow release of sterilization. | High chemical activity, long-term sustained-release antibacterial activity. | Easy to change color, high cost. |
| Titanium dioxide | Photocatalytic antibacterial activity. | Stable chemical properties, broad spectrum of sterilization, excellent acid and alkali resistance, nontoxicity, rich raw material sources. | Difficult to sedimentation, not easy to recover, not selective of sterilization. |
| Zinc oxide class | Photocatalysis, metal ion dissolution and active oxygen antibacterial. | High activity, rapid antibacterial, high safety, low cost, biocompatibility, controllable morphology. | Only under ultraviolet light with sterilization, degradation of organic matter, self-purification ability, no selectivity. |
| Quaternary ammonium salt | Adsorption, penetration, film breaking. | Low cost, fast antibacterial speed. | Poor durability, large effective drug dose, easy to induce drug resistance. |
| Halide amine | Contact with sterilization or release of oxidizing halogen cation. | Strong stability, broad spectrum of sterilization, high efficiency, easy degradation and low toxicity. | Cannot be directly deposited on the surface of matrix. |
| Chitosan | Destroys the cell wall of bacteria and hinders their free movement. | Excellent biocompatibility, low cost, nontoxicity. | Poor water solubility |
| Antimicrobial peptides | Disrupt bacterial membranes and inactivate nucleic acids and cytoplasmic proteins. | High efficiency, broad-spectrum of sterilization, high killing potency, minimum risk for drug resistance. | Poor proteolytic stability, high toxicity toward mammalian cells. |
| Plant extracts | Rupture of the bacterial biofilm by electrostatic interaction | Controllable release of antibacterial agents, prolonged effects, positive effects on growth factors and collagen deposition. | Poor durability |
| Algae and mushroom extracts | Product targeted secondary metabolites | Broad-spectrum of sterilization, excellent antibacterial activity. | Poor anti-fungi activity, limited extraction solvent. |
Preparation method of hydrogels with natural antibacterial agents.
| Preparation | methods | Mechanisms | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ionic Interaction | Actional interaction between metal-ligand interaction or oppositely charged groups | Superior self-healing ability, fatigue resistance, ionic conductivity, environmental response | Complex preparation process and poor mechanical properties | |
| Physical | Hydrogen Bond | Oxhydryl-hydrogen atom interaction | Self-recovery and self-repair properties | Unstable in aqueous environments |
| Cross-Linking | Crystallization | Freeze-thaw process | Soft, flexible, and variable pore-size hydrogels | Instability |
| Hydrophobic Interaction | Cross-linking molecules with hydrophobic moieties in a water-soluble polymer solution | Strong and stable | Poor ductility | |
| Protein-protein Interaction | Non-covalent bond interactions | Excellent cell infiltration capacity | Not resistant to high temperature | |
| Chemical | Conjugation Reaction | Michael addition reaction, Diels–Alder addition reaction, and Schiff's base reaction | Outstanding transparency, biodegradability, biocompatibility, and self-recovery | Instability |
| Cross-Linking | Free Radical Polymerization | Cross-linking under the action of heat or light for covalent bond formation | Antibacterial property, high strain sensitivity, repeatable self-adhesion, and stretchability | Uncontrollable rate of polymerization |
| Enzymatic Reaction | Enzyme driven catalysis | Reversible stiffening/softening capability, adjustable mechanical and biochemical properties | Strict reaction conditions |
Fig. 6(a) Schematic illustration of the FPAu hydrogels application for the fabrication and skeletal muscle regeneration. (b) Antibacterial activity of FPAu hydrogels. Reproduced with permission [144]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier. (c) Schematic illustration of the bacteria killing processes with the hybrid hydrogel under 808 nm NIR light irradiation. (d) Antibacterial activity of the copper loaded hybrid hydrogel. Reproduced with permission [145]. Copyright 2018, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (e) The structure and function of the cell-affinitive, recoverable, ultra-tough, and contact-antibacterial AMD-QCS hydrogel. (f) S. epidermidis and E. coli suspensions and OD measurement of the growth of S. epidermidis and E. coli that were cultured with different specimens for 24 h. OD: optical density. Reproduced with permission [52]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH. (g) Schematic illustration of the antibacterial mechanism of positively charged dendritic polylysine. (h) Quantitative result of the bactericidal efficacy against E. coli and S. aureus and LIVE/DEAD fluorescence images of E. coli and S. aureus incubated with OCMC/G3KP hydrogels with different dendrimer concentrations. Scale bar, 0 μm (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and n = 5). Reproduced with permission [74]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 7(a) Illustration of the accelerated wound healing by the antibacterial and non-fouling hydrogel loading curcumin as an anti-inflammatory drug. (b) Antibacterial activity of hydrogels against S. aureus and E. coli and SEM images of the surfaces of the gauze (as a control) and the hydrogels after contact with bacterial suspension. The scale bar is 5 μm. Reproduced with permission [144]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (c) Illustration of the antibiotic-loaded polymer-hydrogel composites capable of quick and long-term antibacterial activities. (d) Antibacterial activity in terms of OD value against S. aureus and E. coli in the presence of polymersomes at different concentrations. OD: optical density. Reproduced with permission [146]. Copyright 2018, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Comparisons of different antibacterial hydrogels.
| Antibacterial agent | Polymer | Features | Antibacterial activity | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pterostilbene/Gentamicin | – | Antibacterial ability | [ | |
| Natural melanin | – | Excellent photothermal conversion effects, biocompatible, conglutinant | [ | |
| Polymyxin B. | Amphiphilic peptide | Sustained releasing, good biocompatibility | [ | |
| Ag/Biological extract | Alginate | Controllable releasing, thermal | [ | |
| Ag/Curcumin | Bacterial cellulose | High cytocompatibility, antioxidant activity | [ | |
| AuNPs | F127–CHO | Antioxidant activity, antibacterial ability, electroconductive activity | [ | |
| AuNRs | CS | Antibacterial ability, low cytotoxicity | [ | |
| AuNPs/Graphitic | CS/PVA | Antibacterial ability, biocompatibility | [ | |
| Cu-MOP | – | Outstanding biocompatibility, antibacterial ability | [ | |
| CuNPs | GelMA | Antibacterial ability | [ | |
| CuSNPs | MPS | Antibacterial ability, tissue regeneration capability | [ | |
| ZnONPs | CMCS | High swelling behavior | [ | |
| AgNPs | CS/PAA | High synergism, low cytotoxicity, without-contacting antibacterial ability | [ | |
| AgNPs | CS-CMCS | Self-healing, high biocompatibility, high swelling behavior | [ | |
| AgNPs | Gelatin | Excellent antibacterial ability | [ | |
| CMCS/Gentamicin | HA | Hydroscopicity, well vapor permeability rate, enzymatic resistance | [ | |
| 4-HPA | PLL/Aga | Injectable, recoverable, good biocompatibility, stability | [ | |
| Citral/CS | CMC | Antifungal ability, antioxidant | [ | |
| CMCS | CMCS | Good thermal stability, swelling property, biodegradability | [ | |
| ZnNPs | CMCS | Injectable, fluorescent color indication | [ | |
| CS | SiW/PAM | Adhesive, conductive, self-healing | [ | |
| QCS | DMAEMA | Ultra-tough, recoverable, cell-affinitive | [ | |
| AMP | Alginate | Recoverable, good biocompatibility | A. baumannii, | [ |
| AMP | CMCS/Alginate | Superior biocompatibility, no cytotoxicity | [ | |
| AMP | – | Highly selective, effective, safe, well-tolerated, self-assembling | [ | |
| AMP/Penicillin | PCL-b-P-(Lys-stat-Phe) | Injectable, quick and long-acting antibacterial ability | [ |
Fig. 8Compositions and applications of antibacterial adhesive hydrogels.