Literature DB >> 36163257

The likely extinction of hundreds of palm species threatens their contributions to people and ecosystems.

S Bellot1, Y Lu2, A Antonelli2,3,4, W J Baker2, J Dransfield2, F Forest2, W D Kissling5, I J Leitch2, E Nic Lughadha2, I Ondo2, S Pironon2, B E Walker2, R Cámara-Leret6, S P Bachman2.   

Abstract

Protecting nature's contributions to people requires accelerating extinction risk assessment and better integrating evolutionary, functional and used diversity with conservation planning. Here, we report machine learning extinction risk predictions for 1,381 palm species (Arecaceae), a plant family of high socio-economic and ecological importance. We integrate these predictions with published assessments for 508 species (covering 75% of all palm species) and we identify top-priority regions for palm conservation on the basis of their proportion of threatened evolutionarily distinct, functionally distinct and used species. Finally, we explore palm use resilience to identify non-threatened species that could potentially serve as substitutes for threatened used species by providing similar products. We estimate that over a thousand palms (56%) are probably threatened, including 185 species with documented uses. Some regions (New Guinea, Vanuatu and Vietnam) emerge as top ten priorities for conservation only after incorporating machine learning extinction risk predictions. Potential substitutes are identified for 91% of the threatened used species and regional use resilience increases with total palm richness. However, 16 threatened used species lack potential substitutes and 30 regions lack substitutes for at least one of their threatened used palm species. Overall, we show that hundreds of species of this keystone family face extinction, some of them probably irreplaceable, at least locally. This highlights the need for urgent actions to avoid major repercussions on palm-associated ecosystem processes and human livelihoods in the coming decades.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36163257     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01858-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   19.100


  32 in total

1.  High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services.

Authors:  Forest Isbell; Vincent Calcagno; Andy Hector; John Connolly; W Stanley Harpole; Peter B Reich; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Bernhard Schmid; David Tilman; Jasper van Ruijven; Alexandra Weigelt; Brian J Wilsey; Erika S Zavaleta; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Predicting plant conservation priorities on a global scale.

Authors:  Tara A Pelletier; Bryan C Carstens; David C Tank; Jack Sullivan; Anahí Espíndola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Predicting the conservation status of data-deficient species.

Authors:  Lucie M Bland; Ben Collen; C David L Orme; Jon Bielby
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Automated conservation assessment of the orchid family with deep learning.

Authors:  Alexander Zizka; Daniele Silvestro; Pati Vitt; Tiffany M Knight
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Quantifying progress toward a conservation assessment for all plants.

Authors:  Steven P Bachman; Eimear M Nic Lughadha; Malin C Rivers
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 6.  Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessments.

Authors:  Victor Cazalis; Moreno Di Marco; Stuart H M Butchart; H Reşit Akçakaya; Manuela González-Suárez; Carsten Meyer; Viola Clausnitzer; Monika Böhm; Alexander Zizka; Pedro Cardoso; Aafke M Schipper; Steven P Bachman; Bruce E Young; Michael Hoffmann; Ana Benítez-López; Pablo M Lucas; Nathalie Pettorelli; Guillaume Patoine; Michela Pacifici; Theresa Jörger-Hickfang; Thomas M Brooks; Carlo Rondinini; Samantha L L Hill; Piero Visconti; Luca Santini
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny.

Authors:  Nick J B Isaac; Samuel T Turvey; Ben Collen; Carly Waterman; Jonathan E M Baillie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  ConR: An R package to assist large-scale multispecies preliminary conservation assessments using distribution data.

Authors:  Gilles Dauby; Tariq Stévart; Vincent Droissart; Ariane Cosiaux; Vincent Deblauwe; Murielle Simo-Droissart; Marc S M Sosef; Porter P Lowry; George E Schatz; Roy E Gereau; Thomas L P Couvreur
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  A framework for evaluating the impact of the IUCN Red List of threatened species.

Authors:  Jessica Betts; Richard P Young; Craig Hilton-Taylor; Michael Hoffmann; Jon Paul Rodríguez; Simon N Stuart; E J Milner-Gulland
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 6.560

10.  A third of the tropical African flora is potentially threatened with extinction.

Authors:  T Stévart; G Dauby; P P Lowry; A Blach-Overgaard; V Droissart; D J Harris; B A Mackinder; G E Schatz; B Sonké; M S M Sosef; J-C Svenning; J J Wieringa; T L P Couvreur
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.