Literature DB >> 36161887

Nonequilibrium phase transitions in competitive markets caused by network effects.

Andrew Lucas1.   

Abstract

Network effects are the added value derived solely from the popularity of a product in an economic market. Using agent-based models inspired by statistical physics, we propose a minimal theory of a competitive market for (nearly) indistinguishable goods with demand-side network effects, sold by statistically identical sellers. With weak network effects, the model reproduces conventional microeconomics: there is a statistical steady state of (nearly) perfect competition. Increasing network effects, we find a phase transition to a robust nonequilibrium phase driven by the spontaneous formation and collapse of fads in the market. When sellers update prices sufficiently quickly, an emergent monopolist can capture the market and undercut competition, leading to a symmetry- and ergodicity-breaking transition. The nonequilibrium phase simultaneously exhibits three empirically established phenomena not contained in the standard theory of competitive markets: spontaneous price fluctuations, persistent seller profits, and broad distributions of firm market shares.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agent-based simulations; microeconomics; network effects; nonequilibrium statistical physics

Year:  2022        PMID: 36161887      PMCID: PMC9546563          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2206702119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  7 in total

1.  Network growth by copying.

Authors:  P L Krapivsky; S Redner
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2005-03-17

2.  Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik; Peter Sheridan Dodds; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks.

Authors:  Sinan Aral; Lev Muchnik; Arun Sundararajan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Simple model for multiple-choice collective decision making.

Authors:  Ching Hua Lee; Andrew Lucas
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2014-11-10

5.  Quantifying reflexivity in financial markets: toward a prediction of flash crashes.

Authors:  Vladimir Filimonov; Didier Sornette
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2012-05-09

6.  A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.

Authors:  M Nowak; K Sigmund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.