Literature DB >> 36161550

Efficacy of low or heavy rituximab‑based protocols and comparison with seven regimens in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Miaomiao Chen1,2, Xuehan Zhang1, Yi Xiong1, Gaosi Xu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficiency of tacrolimus + rituximab and rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). But optimal dosages of rituximab for IMN are still controversial. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the efficacy of different rituximab dosages and other main treatments in IMN treatment.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies analyzing nine therapeutic regimens for IMN were included from some databases. Network comparisons were performed to analyze the rates of total remission (TR) and relapse rate. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) was calculated to rank interventions.
RESULTS: Twelve RCTs and 12 observational studies involving 1724 patients were pooled for comparison of 9 interventions. This NMA demonstrated steroids + tacrolimus was ranked first in the aspect of total remission at 6 months (92%) and 12 months (81.3%). The total remission rate associated with tacrolimus + rituximab increased rapidly between the sixth (SUCRA 22.5%) and the twelfth month (SUCRA 63.9%). Tacrolimus and cyclosporine A were associated with higher total remission at 6 months (78.8% and 65.4%, separately) and decreased at 12 months (58.1 and 34.9%, separately). Steroids + cyclophosphamide, rituximab (Heavy dose) and rituximab (Low dose) had stable remission rates at 6 (63.7%, 46.6%, and 19.4%) and 12 months (SUCRA 66.9%, 39.6%, and 28.8%). Tacrolimus and cyclosporine A were associated with a significantly higher risk of relapse than that with steroids + cyclophosphamide, rituximab (Heavy dose), and rituximab (Low dose).
CONCLUSIONS: For IMN in adults, steroids + tacrolimus was ranked first in the aspect of total remission, followed by steroids + cyclophosphamide and steroids + cyclosporine A. The TR associated with rituximab (Heavy and Low dosage) at 12 months was higher than that at 6 months. And rituximab (Heavy dose) achieves a higher rate of total remission than that of rituximab (Low dose).
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyclophosphamide; Cyclosporine A; Idiopathic membranous nephropathy; Rituximab; Tacrolimus

Year:  2022        PMID: 36161550     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03372-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.266


  41 in total

1.  Thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A in idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Nicola M Tomas; Laurence H Beck; Catherine Meyer-Schwesinger; Barbara Seitz-Polski; Hong Ma; Gunther Zahner; Guillaume Dolla; Elion Hoxha; Udo Helmchen; Anne-Sophie Dabert-Gay; Delphine Debayle; Michael Merchant; Jon Klein; David J Salant; Rolf A K Stahl; Gérard Lambeau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The pathogenesis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a 50-year odyssey.

Authors:  Richard J Glassock
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria could be a useful outcome predictor of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Tomohiro Mizuno; Waichi Sato; Kazuhiro Ishikawa; Hibiki Shinjo; Yasuhiro Miyagawa; Yukihiro Noda; Enyu Imai; Kiyofumi Yamada
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.935

Review 4.  Alkylating agents in membranous nephropathy: efficacy proven beyond doubt.

Authors:  Julia M Hofstra; Jack F M Wetzels
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Safety of Rituximab Compared with Steroids and Cyclophosphamide for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy.

Authors:  Jan A J G van den Brand; Piero Ruggenenti; Antonietta Chianca; Julia M Hofstra; Annalisa Perna; Barbara Ruggiero; Jack F M Wetzels; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 6.  Primary Membranous Nephropathy.

Authors:  William G Couser
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Prognostic value of the dynamics of M-type phospholipase A2 receptor antibody titers in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy treated with two different immunosuppression regimens.

Authors:  Alfonso Segarra Medrano; Elias Jatem Escalante; Clara Carnicer Cáceres; Irene Agraz Pamplona; Maria Teresa Salcedo Allende; Natalia Ramos Terrades; Naiara Valtierra Carmeno; Elena Ostos Roldán; Karla Viviana Arredondo Agudelo; Juliana Jaramillo Vasquez
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Titrating rituximab to circulating B cells to optimize lymphocytolytic therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Paolo Cravedi; Piero Ruggenenti; Maria Chiara Sghirlanzoni; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 9.  Primary membranous nephropathy: comprehensive review and historical perspective.

Authors:  Krishna C Keri; Samuel Blumenthal; Varsha Kulkarni; Laurence Beck; Tepsiri Chongkrairatanakul
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Rituximab for Severe Membranous Nephropathy: A 6-Month Trial with Extended Follow-Up.

Authors:  Karine Dahan; Hanna Debiec; Emmanuelle Plaisier; Marine Cachanado; Alexandra Rousseau; Laura Wakselman; Pierre-Antoine Michel; Fabrice Mihout; Bertrand Dussol; Marie Matignon; Christiane Mousson; Tabassome Simon; Pierre Ronco
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.