| Literature DB >> 36159472 |
Yi Zhao1, Yujian Huang1, Kaiguo Gao1, Xiaolu Wen1, Shenglan Hu1, Li Wang1, Zongyong Jiang1, Hao Xiao1.
Abstract
Background: Resveratrol has numerous beneficial properties, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory properties. High summer temperatures in Southern China affect the reproductive performance of sows. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of dietary resveratrol supplementation in different thermal environments on the reproductive performance, antioxidant capacity, immune function, and intestinal microbes of sows and piglets during late gestation and lactation, as well as their relationship with colostrum immunoglobulin.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; intestinal microbiota; piglets; resveratrol; sow
Year: 2022 PMID: 36159472 PMCID: PMC9501877 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.971496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Composition and nutrient levels of the basal diet on (air-dry basis).
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Corn (8%) | 75.85 | 67.85 |
| Soybean meal (44%) | 8.50 | 23.00 |
| Alfalfa powder (13%) | 12.50 | – |
| Fishmeal | – | 3.00 |
| Soybean oil | – | 2.00 |
| Lysine hydrochloride | – | 0.15 |
| CaHPO4 | 0.80 | 1.10 |
| Limestone | 0.70 | 1.20 |
| NaCl | 0.40 | 0.45 |
| 50% Choline chloride 50% | 0.25 | 0.15 |
| 1% Premix | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Nutrient levels | ||
| DE kcal/kg | 3150 | 3475 |
| NE kcal/kg | 2334 | 2532 |
| Crude protein % | 11.17 | 17.60 |
| NDF % | 12.82 | 8.44 |
| SID Lys | 0.38 | 0.93 |
| SID Met + Cys | 0.35 | 0.52 |
| SID Thr | 0.33 | 0.54 |
| SID Trp | 0.10 | 0.19 |
| TCa | 0.62 | 0.90 |
| TP | 0.43 | 0.63 |
| STTD | 0.26 | 0.41 |
Nutrient levels were the calculated values. DE, digestible energy; NE, net energy; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber.
The premix provided the following per kg of the diet: VA 10000 IU, VD 1400 IU, VE 40 mg, VK 3.0 mg, VB 10.50 mg, VB12 0.04 mg, nicotinic acid 45 mg, pantothenic acid 20 mg, folic acid 1.2 mg, biotin 0.20 mg, choline chloride 550 mg, Cu 80 mg, Fe 100 mg, Zn 100 mg, Mn 50 mg, I 0.3 mg, and Se 0.25 mg. 2SID, standardized ileal digestible.
Figure 1Effects of dietary resveratrol supplementation during gestation and lactation on the reproduction performance of sows. Data were expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three independent experiments. (A) Schematic diagram of the research design. (B) The temperature of the hog house. (C) Total number of births. (D) Number of live births. (E) Litter weight gain at weaning. (F) Initial weight. (G) Average daily feed intake of sows. *p < 0.05.
Figure 2Effect of dietary resveratrol supplementation for the second phase during gestation and lactation on blood hormonal and biochemical markers. (A) Blood hormones in sows during 14 days of lactation. (B) Biochemical indices of sows during 14 days of lactation. Data were expressed as means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. GH, growth hormone; INS, insulin; PROG, progesterone; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; TG, triglycerides; UA, uric acid; GLU, glucose; UREA, urea; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; ALB, albumin; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; TP, total protein; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CHO, cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; BUN, urea nitrogen. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 3(A) Effect of dietary resveratrol supplementation during gestation and lactation on the plasma antioxidant status of sows. (B) Effect of dietary resveratrol supplementation during gestation and lactation on the plasma antioxidant status of piglets. (C) Effect of dietary resveratrol supplementation during gestation and lactation on the antioxidant status of milk. Data were expressed as means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 4(A) Effect of dietary resveratrol supplementation during gestation and lactation on the antioxidant status and immunoglobulin of milk. (B) Effect of dietary resveratrol supplementation during gestation and lactation on the composition of colostrum and ordinary milk. Data were expressed as means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. TS, total solid; SNF, solid non-fat. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 5(A) Intestinal microbiota composition of sows and piglets by principal component analysis (PCA) analysis. Con, control treatment; Res, resveratrol treatment. (B) Intestinal microbiota composition of sows and piglets by α-diversity analysis. Data were expressed as means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. **p < 0.01.
Figure 6(A–E) Relative abundances of main taxa at different levels. Values are means ± SEMs. Differences were assessed by unpaired t-test with Welch's correction or Mann–Whitney U-test. The selection of analysis methods depends on whether the data were in Gaussian distribution and had equal variance or not. Values are means SEMs. Data were denoted as follows: *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
Canonical correlations between litter weight gain at weaning and immunoglobulin of colostrum with fecal microbiota of piglets.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weaning litter weight gain | Immunoglobulin of colostrum | IgA | 0.172 | 0.575 |
| IgG | 0.193 | 0.527 | ||
| IgM | 0.660 | 0.014 | ||
| Alloprevotella | 0.269 | 0.375 | ||
| Weaning litter weight gain | Fecal microbiota of piglets | Escherichia-shigella | – 0.122 | 0.692 |
| Lactobacillus | 0.705 | 0.007 | ||
| Alloprevotella | 0.670 | 0.012 | ||
| IgA | Escherichia-shigella | – 0.290 | 0.336 | |
| Lactobacillus | 0.447 | 0.125 | ||
| Alloprevotella | 0.694 | 0.009 | ||
| IgG | Escherichia-shigella | – 0.315 | 0.294 | |
| Immunoglobulin of colostrum | Fecal microbiota of piglets | Lactobacillus | 0.472 | 0.104 |
| Alloprevotella | 0.488 | 0.091 | ||
| IgM | Escherichia-shigella | – 0.151 | 0.622 | |
| Lactobacillus | 0.623 | 0.023 | ||
Data were expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three independent experiments.