| Literature DB >> 36159155 |
Li Feng1, Zong Hai Huang1, Yan Mei Zhong1, WenKe Xiao1, Chuan Biao Wen1, Hai Bei Song1, Jin Hong Guo2.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the technical research and application characteristics of deep learning in tongue-facial diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: Deep learning; face diagnosis; image processing; tongue diagnosis; traditional medicine
Year: 2022 PMID: 36159155 PMCID: PMC9490485 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221124436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Digit Health ISSN: 2055-2076
Figure 1.Composition of tongue diagnostic instrument.
Figure 2.The constitution of tongue image feature processing system.
Figure 3.Flowchart of objectification of lingual diagnosis.
Research status of tongue image classification algorithm.
| References | Methods | Classification object | Indicator | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tang et al.
| A joint multi-task learning model based on ImageNet and RPN network | Tongue color, coating color, fissure | Speed | Speed compared to the traditional method |
| Xiao et al.
| Tongue color classification method based on AlexNet network | Tongue color | Accuracy | 94.85% |
| Yang and Zhang
| Based on Inception_v3 + 2NN | tongue features | Accuracy | Inception_v3 + 2NN |
| Song et al.
| Based on GoogLeNet, ResNet | Tongue features | Accuracy | Inception-v highest accuracy 94.88% |
| Kanawong et al.
| Feature extraction based on HSV and RGB | Tongue color | Comprehensive evaluation index (F- | F-measure mean |
| Yan et al.
| YoloV5 deep learning algorithm based | Tongue features (tooth marks) | Accuracy | 93.7% |
| Jiao et al.
| Weighted SVM method | Unbalanced tongue samples | Accuracy | Weighted SVM method accuracy |
Figure 4.Fully convolutional network (FCN) model diagram.
Figure 5.U-Net algorithm composition.
Figure 6.U-Net algorithm diagram.
Figure 7.Types of deep learning algorithms for tongue and face image segmentation.
Figure 8.Four kinds of tongue image segmentation contrast map.
Comparison results of four tongue segmentation algorithms.
| Algorithm | Snake | Otsu | Seg-Net | U-Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size of training set | 1233 | 1233 | 1233 | 1233 |
| Sample size of test set | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 |
| PA | 0.988 | 0.983 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
| Runtime | 14,645 ms | 6070 ms | 54 ms | 58 ms |
| MIOU | 0.536 | 0.594 | 0.945 | 0.957 |