Literature DB >> 33128230

Breast tumor segmentation in 3D automatic breast ultrasound using Mask scoring R-CNN.

Yang Lei1, Xiuxiu He1, Jincao Yao2,3, Tonghe Wang1, Lijing Wang2,3, Wei Li2,3, Walter J Curran1, Tian Liu1, Dong Xu2,3, Xiaofeng Yang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Automatic breast ultrasound (ABUS) imaging has become an essential tool in breast cancer diagnosis since it provides complementary information to other imaging modalities. Lesion segmentation on ABUS is a prerequisite step of breast cancer computer-aided diagnosis (CAD). This work aims to develop a deep learning-based method for breast tumor segmentation using three-dimensional (3D) ABUS automatically.
METHODS: For breast tumor segmentation in ABUS, we developed a Mask scoring region-based convolutional neural network (R-CNN) that consists of five subnetworks, that is, a backbone, a regional proposal network, a region convolutional neural network head, a mask head, and a mask score head. A network block building direct correlation between mask quality and region class was integrated into a Mask scoring R-CNN based framework for the segmentation of new ABUS images with ambiguous regions of interest (ROIs). For segmentation accuracy evaluation, we retrospectively investigated 70 patients with breast tumor confirmed with needle biopsy and manually delineated on ABUS, of which 40 were used for fivefold cross-validation and 30 were used for hold-out test. The comparison between the automatic breast tumor segmentations and the manual contours was quantified by I) six metrics including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard index, 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), mean surface distance (MSD), residual mean square distance (RMSD), and center of mass distance (CMD); II) Pearson correlation analysis and Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: The mean (median) DSC was 85% ± 10.4% (89.4%) and 82.1% ± 14.5% (85.6%) for cross-validation and hold-out test, respectively. The corresponding HD95, MSD, RMSD, and CMD of the two tests was 1.646 ± 1.191 and 1.665 ± 1.129 mm, 0.489 ± 0.406 and 0.475 ± 0.371 mm, 0.755 ± 0.755 and 0.751 ± 0.508 mm, and 0.672 ± 0.612 and 0.665 ± 0.729 mm. The mean volumetric difference (mean and ± 1.96 standard deviation) was 0.47 cc ([-0.77, 1.71)) for the cross-validation and 0.23 cc ([-0.23 0.69]) for hold-out test, respectively.
CONCLUSION: We developed a novel Mask scoring R-CNN approach for the automated segmentation of the breast tumor in ABUS images and demonstrated its accuracy for breast tumor segmentation. Our learning-based method can potentially assist the clinical CAD of breast cancer using 3D ABUS imaging.
© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automatic breast ultrasound; breast cancer; mask scoring R-CNN; segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33128230     DOI: 10.1002/mp.14569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  Prostate and dominant intraprostatic lesion segmentation on PET/CT using cascaded regional-net.

Authors:  Luke A Matkovic; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Oladunni O Akin-Akintayo; Olayinka A Abiodun Ojo; Akinyemi A Akintayo; Justin Roper; Jeffery D Bradley; Tian Liu; David M Schuster; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  MRI-based prostate and dominant lesion segmentation using cascaded scoring convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Zachary A Eidex; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Marian Axente; Oladunni O Akin-Akintayo; Olayinka A Abiodun Ojo; Akinyemi A Akintayo; Justin Roper; Jeffery D Bradley; Tian Liu; David M Schuster; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.506

3.  Performance of novel deep learning network with the incorporation of the automatic segmentation network for diagnosis of breast cancer in automated breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Qiucheng Wang; He Chen; Gongning Luo; Bo Li; Haitao Shang; Hua Shao; Shanshan Sun; Zhongshuai Wang; Kuanquan Wang; Wen Cheng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 4.  A review of deep learning based methods for medical image multi-organ segmentation.

Authors:  Yabo Fu; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Breast MRI Tumor Automatic Segmentation and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Discrimination Algorithm Based on Deep Learning.

Authors:  Ying-Ying Guo; Yin-Hui Huang; Yi Wang; Jing Huang; Qing-Quan Lai; Yuan-Zhe Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Research and application of tongue and face diagnosis based on deep learning.

Authors:  Li Feng; Zong Hai Huang; Yan Mei Zhong; WenKe Xiao; Chuan Biao Wen; Hai Bei Song; Jin Hong Guo
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-09-19

Review 7.  Deep learning in breast imaging.

Authors:  Arka Bhowmik; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2022-05-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.