Literature DB >> 36157569

Variable inclusion strategies through directed acyclic graphs to adjust health surveys subject to selection bias for producing national estimates.

Yan Li1, Katherine E Irimata2, Yulei He2, Jennifer Parker2.   

Abstract

Along with the rapid emergence of web surveys to address time-sensitive priority topics, various propensity score (PS)-based adjustment methods have been developed to improve population representativeness for nonprobability- or probability-sampled web surveys subject to selection bias. Conventional PS-based methods construct pseudo-weights for web samples using a higher-quality reference probability sample. The bias reduction, however, depends on the outcome and variables collected in both web and reference samples. A central issue is identifying variables for inclusion in PS-adjustment. In this paper, directed acyclic graph (DAG), a common graphical tool for causal studies but largely under-utilized in survey research, is used to examine and elucidate how different types of variables in the causal pathways impact the performance of PS-adjustment. While past literature generally recommends including all variables, our research demonstrates that only certain types of variables are needed in PS-adjustment. Our research is illustrated by NCHS' Research and Development Survey, a probability-sampled web survey with potential selection bias, PS-adjusted to the National Health Interview Survey, to estimate U.S. asthma prevalence. Findings in this paper can be used by National Statistics Offices to design questionnaires with variables that improve web-samples' population representativeness and to release more timely and accurate estimates for priority topics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kernel weighting; logistic regression; propensity score model; survey inference

Year:  2022        PMID: 36157569      PMCID: PMC9490791          DOI: 10.2478/jos-2022-0038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Off Stat        ISSN: 0282-423X            Impact factor:   1.139


  17 in total

1.  On weighting the rates in non-response weights.

Authors:  Roderick J Little; Sonya Vartivarian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sherry Weitzen; Kate L Lapane; Alicia Y Toledano; Anne L Hume; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  A definition of causal effect for epidemiological research.

Authors:  M A Hernán
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Variable selection for propensity score models.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Kenneth J Rothman; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Comparison of Quarterly and Yearly Calibration Data for Propensity Score Adjusted Web Survey Estimates.

Authors:  Katherine E Irimata; Yulei He; Bill Cai; Hee-Choon Shin; Van L Parsons; Jennifer D Parker
Journal:  Surv Methods Insights Field       Date:  2020-10-12

6.  Adjusted logistic propensity weighting methods for population inference using nonprobability volunteer-based epidemiologic cohorts.

Authors:  Lingxiao Wang; Richard Valliant; Yan Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Evidence of a healthy volunteer effect in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Authors:  P F Pinsky; A Miller; B S Kramer; T Church; D Reding; P Prorok; E Gelmann; R E Schoen; S Buys; R B Hayes; C D Berg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Overview and Initial Results of the National Center for Health Statistics' Research and Development Survey.

Authors:  Jennifer Parker; Kristen Miller; Yulei He; Paul Scanlon; Bill Cai; Hee-Choon Shin; Van Parsons; Katherine Irimata
Journal:  Stat J IAOS       Date:  2020-11-25

9.  Comparison of US panel vendors for online surveys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Ron D Hays; A Simon Pickard; David Cella; Dennis A Revicki; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 Seropositivity During the First Six Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.

Authors:  Heather Kalish; Carleen Klumpp-Thomas; Sally Hunsberger; Holly Ann Baus; Michael P Fay; Nalyn Siripong; Jing Wang; Jennifer Hicks; Jennifer Mehalko; Jameson Travers; Matthew Drew; Kyle Pauly; Jacquelyn Spathies; Tran Ngo; Kenneth M Adusei; Maria Karkanitsa; Jennifer A Croker; Yan Li; Barry I Graubard; Lindsay Czajkowski; Olivia Belliveau; Cheryl Chairez; Kelly Snead; Peter Frank; Anandakumar Shunmugavel; Alison Han; Luca T Giurgea; Luz Angela Rosas; Rachel Bean; Rani Athota; Adriana Cervantes-Medina; Monica Gouzoulis; Brittany Heffelfinger; Shannon Valenti; Rocco Caldararo; Michelle M Kolberg; Andrew Kelly; Reid Simon; Saifullah Shafiq; Vanessa Wall; Susan Reed; Eric W Ford; Ravi Lokwani; John-Paul Denson; Simon Messing; Sam G Michael; William Gillette; Robert P Kimberly; Steven E Reis; Matthew D Hall; Dominic Esposito; Matthew J Memoli; Kaitlyn Sadtler
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 17.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.