Literature DB >> 34219260

Adjusted logistic propensity weighting methods for population inference using nonprobability volunteer-based epidemiologic cohorts.

Lingxiao Wang1, Richard Valliant1,2, Yan Li1.   

Abstract

Many epidemiologic studies forgo probability sampling and turn to nonprobability volunteer-based samples because of cost, response burden, and invasiveness of biological samples. However, finite population (FP) inference is difficult to make from the nonprobability sample due to the lack of population representativeness. Aiming for making inferences at the population level using nonprobability samples, various inverse propensity score weighting methods have been studied with the propensity defined by the participation rate of population units in the nonprobability sample. In this article, we propose an adjusted logistic propensity weighting (ALP) method to estimate the participation rates for nonprobability sample units. The proposed ALP method is easy to implement by ready-to-use software while producing approximately unbiased estimators for population quantities regardless of the nonprobability sample rate. The efficiency of the ALP estimator can be further improved by scaling the survey sample weights in propensity estimation. Taylor linearization variance estimators are proposed for ALP estimators of FP means that account for all sources of variability. The proposed ALP methods are evaluated numerically via simulation studies and empirically using the naïve unweighted National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III sample, while taking the 1997 National Health Interview Survey as the reference, to estimate the 15-year mortality rates.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  finite population inference; nonprobability sample; propensity score weighting; survey sampling; variance estimation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34219260     DOI: 10.1002/sim.9122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  3 in total

1.  Variable inclusion strategies through directed acyclic graphs to adjust health surveys subject to selection bias for producing national estimates.

Authors:  Yan Li; Katherine E Irimata; Yulei He; Jennifer Parker
Journal:  J Off Stat       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.139

2.  Estimated Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Clinically Significant Anxiety and Depression Among US Adults During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Christopher J Ruhm; Victor Puac-Polanco; Irving H Hwang; Sue Lee; Maria V Petukhova; Nancy A Sampson; Hannah N Ziobrowski; Alan M Zaslavsky; Jose R Zubizarreta
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in obesity and body fat distribution: An All of Us Research Program demonstration project.

Authors:  Jason H Karnes; Amit Arora; Jianglin Feng; Heidi E Steiner; Lina Sulieman; Eric Boerwinkle; Cheryl Clark; Mine Cicek; Elizabeth Cohn; Kelly Gebo; Roxana Loperena-Cortes; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Kelsey Mayo; Steve Mockrin; Andrea Ramirez; Sheri Schully; Yann C Klimentidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.