| Literature DB >> 36157471 |
Liang Yong-Ping1, Zhang Juan2, Jing-Wu Li2, Huai-Hua Qi2, Jing-Ping Liu1, Yong-Feng Zhao3, Wen-Gang Liu3, Xing-Hao Zhang3, Ping Zhou3.
Abstract
Objective: The efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser ablation (PLA) for treating recurrent papillary thyroid cancer nodules (RPTCNs).Entities:
Keywords: laser; minimally invasive treatment; percutaneous thermal ablation; recurrent; thyroid cancer; ultrasound
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36157471 PMCID: PMC9504866 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.946966
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Inclusion and exclusion criteria in this study.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Inclusion criteria | 1. cytological diagnosis showing PTMC in patients with history of thyroid unilateral lobectomy due to papillary thyroid cancer |
| 2. single lesion with a maximum diameter less than 10mm | |
| 3. a minimum distance from the lesion to the thyroid capsule of ≥3mm | |
| 4. no tumor invasion to the extra-thyroid organs (trachea, common carotid artery or esophagus) | |
| 5. patients who were not eligible for surgery or unwilling to undergo surgery due to high surgical risk or other reasons | |
| 6. patients who were anxious and affected their normal life or unwilling to undergo clinical observation | |
| Excluded criteria | 1. cytological diagnosis showing another type of thyroid malignancy such as medullary carcinoma |
| 2. clinically apparent multi-centricity | |
| 3. other nodules with sonographic features suggestive of malignancy including microcalcification, local invasion, height greater than width, and markedly reduced echogenicity | |
| 4. the lesions were close to trachea, esophagus or common carotid artery, and hydrodissection was difficult to establish | |
| 5. lesions located in the isthmus | |
| 6. ultrasound or other image examination revealing suspicious cervical or distant lymph node metastasis | |
| 7. unable to cooperate with the puncture |
Figure 1After local anesthesia, a mixture of 2% lidocaine and physiological saline was injected into the surrounding thyroid capsule by 23-gauge needle (arrow in A), achieving a ‘hydrodissection’ (dotted line in B) to protect the common carotid artery from thermal injury.
Figure 2During laser lation the hyperechoic area (arrow in A) around the pointed end of the optical fiber. The lesion (arrow in B, transverse plane; arrow in C, longitudinal plane) appeared medium-high echogenicity in the ablation area and hypoecho in the surrounding area, with a clear boundary between the ablation area and normal tissue 24h after operation. There was no contrast agent perfusion in the ablation area (arrow in D) after PLA 24h on CEUS.
Baseline characteristics of patients with RPTCNs treated with PLA.
| Item | Number |
|---|---|
| Subjects | 43 |
| Female, n (%) | 31 (72) |
| Age, year | 38.72 ± 11.13 |
| Age at diagnosis, year | 31.74 ± 9.97 |
| Time between primary and recurrence, year | 7.58 ± 2.06 |
| Diameter, mm | 5.1 ± 1.4 |
| Volume, mm3 | 46.22 ± 20.46 |
| Total energy, J | 1185.02 ± 210.42 (840-1500) |
| Total ablation time, s | 395.01 ± 70.14 (280.0~500) |
| VAS | 2.8 ± 1.3 |
| FU period, mo (%) | 36(11) 30(29) 24(54) 18(79) 12(100) |
Values are reported as mean ± SD. FU, follow-up; mo, months; J, Joule.
Thyroid laboratory tests and blood tests results in pre- and post-ablation.
| Time | TSH(μIU/ml) | T3(ng/ml) | T4(μg/dl) | FT3(pg/ml) | FT4(ng/dl) | WBC(10^9/L) | RBC(10^12/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | 0.48 ± 0.26 | 0.87 ± 0.41 | 5.73 ± 1.03 | 2.02 ± 0.48 | 0.91 ± 0.14 | 7.28 ± 1.10 | 4.72 ± 0.69 |
| 1 mo | 0.49 ± 0.32 | 0.92 ± 0.50 | 6.20 ± 1.27 | 2.23 ± 0.54 | 1.13 ± 0.21 | 7.79 ± 1.35 | 4.66 ± 0.85 |
| 3 mo | 0.47 ± 0.30 | 0.90 ± 0.47 | 6.07 ± 1.01 | 2.16 ± 0.51 | 1.05 ± 0.17 | 7.64 ± 1.21 | 4.81 ± 0.53 |
| 6 mo | 0.46 ± 0.24 | 0.88 ± 0.49 | 6.19 ± 1.17 | 2.07 ± 0.47 | 1.01 ± 0.11 | 7.38 ± 1.24 | 4.77 ± 0.76 |
| 12mo | 0.47 ± 0.29 | 0.86 ± 0.44 | 6.31 ± 1.13 | 2.14 ± 0.56 | 0.98 ± 0.15 | 7.04 ± 1.06 | 4.61 ± 0.62 |
Values are reported as mean ± SD. Pre, pre-ablation; mo, months.
Figure 3(A) The ablation lesion (arrow in A, transverse plane; arrow in B, longitudinal plane) shrank gradually after PLA 3 months. The ablation lesion (arrow in C, transverse plane; arrow in D, longitudinal plane) disappeared completely after PLA 30 months.
Outcomes of RPTCNs treated after PLA.
| Time | N | Max D, mm | Volume, mm3 | VRR (%) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | scale | Mean | Scale | ||||
| BL | 43 | 5.1 ± 1.4 | 3.5-8.1 | 46.22 ± 20.46 | 18.41-179.80 | – | – |
| 1D | 43 | 17.29 ± 4.1 | 9.96-26.8 | 618.6 ± 503.90 | 110.7-1802.5 | -1238.38 | 0.00 |
| 1M | 43 | 13.97 ± 3.73 | 7.72-21.03 | 313.13 ± 270.74 | 52.63-1202.94 | -577.48 | 0.00 |
| 3M | 43 | 9.91 ± 3.18 | 3.93-16.18 | 119.30 ± 116.25 | 7.39-484.83 | -158.11 | 0.00 |
| 6M | 43 | 6.87 ± 2.73 | 1.03-13.54 | 40.71 ± 60.59 | 0-302.16 | 11.92 | 0.00 |
| 12M | 43 | 3.30 ± 2.41 | 0.7-10.2 | 18.19 ± 28.52 | 0-157.13 | 60.64 | 0.00 |
| 18M | 35 | 1.99 ± 2.23 | 0-7.4 | 8.2 ± 13.52 | 0-74.7 | 82.26 | 0.00 |
| 24M | 24 | 1.14 ± 1.6 | 0-4.1 | 4.18 ± 7.73 | 0-34.76 | 90.96 | 0.00 |
| 30M | 13 | 1.0 ± 1.42 | 0-3.6 | 2.91 ± 4.39 | 0-30.24 | 93.7 | 0.00 |
| 36M | 5 | 0.73 ± 1.1 | 0-2.8 | 1.02 ± 1.92 | 0-24.22 | 97.79 | 0.00 |
BL, baseline; D, diameter; VRR, volume reduction rate.