Literature DB >> 36157363

Risk prediction of common bile duct stone recurrence based on new common bile duct morphological subtypes.

Hirokazu Saito1, Shuji Tada2.   

Abstract

Stones in the common bile duct (CBD) are reported worldwide, and this condition is majorly managed through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). CBD stone recurrence is an important issue after endoscopic stone removal. Therefore, it is essential to identify its risk factors to determine the necessity of regular follow-up in patients who underwent endoscopic removal of CBD stones. The authors identified that the S and polyline morphological subtypes of CBD were associated with increased stone recurrence. New morphological subtypes of CBD presented by the authors can be important risk predictors of recurrence after endoscopic stone removal. Furthermore, the new morphological subtypes of CBD may predict the risk of residual CBD stones or technical difficulty in CBD stone removal. Further studies with a large sample size and longer follow-up durations are warranted to examine the usefulness of the newly identified morphological subtypes of CBD in predicting the outcomes of ERCP for CBD stone removal. ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common bile duct morphology; Common bile duct stone; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Recurrence; Risk prediction; Stone removal

Year:  2022        PMID: 36157363      PMCID: PMC9453334          DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i8.874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg


Core Tip: It is important to identify the risk factors associated with the recurrence of common bile duct (CBD) stones after endoscopic treatment as it helps determine the necessity of regular follow-up in patients who underwent endoscopic CBD stone removal. CBD morphology can be an important predictor of stone recurrence after endoscopic stone removal. Further studies with a large sample size and a longer follow-up period are warranted to examine the efficacy of the new CBD morphological subtypes presented by the authors for predicting endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes after CBD stone removal.

TO THE EDITOR

We read with interest the retrospective cohort study by Ji et al[1]. In their study, the authors presented that the morphologies of the common bile duct (CBD), especially the S and polyline types, were associated with increased recurrence of CBD stones. Identifying the risk factors for recurrence after endoscopic stone removal is important to determine the necessity of regular follow-up examination for patients who underwent endoscopic removal of CBD stones. Several studies have reported the risk factors of CBD stone recurrence after endoscopic treatment[2-6]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that CBD morphology can be associated with CBD stone recurrence after endoscopic treatment. The new morphological subtypes of CBD presented in this study can be important predictors of the risk of CBD stone recurrence after endoscopic CBD stone removal. Several aspects of this study need to be discussed. First, the recurrence of cholesterol CBD stones, which account for 10% of all CBD stones[7], was not evaluated in this study because CBD stones reported in this study were diagnosed using abdominal computed tomography. Furthermore, the follow-up protocol for evaluating stone recurrence was unclear. Second, CBD morphology was evaluated using a cholangiogram from an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube; however, evaluating CBD morphology using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography before endoscopic treatment may be a better option as the shape of the ENBD tube may affect the CBD morphology. Third, the new CBD morphological subtypes suggested by the authors may be useful for predicting residual stones after endoscopic removal as the CBD morphology may be responsible for the technical difficulties associated with endoscopic CBD stone removal. Finally, the authors’ new CBD morphological subtypes were not risk predictors of multiple stone recurrence in this study, which included a small sample size and a short follow-up period of 19 mo; however, the author’s new CBD morphological subtypes may have the potential to predict multiple stone recurrence. Therefore, further studies with a larger sample size and a longer follow-up period are warranted to investigate the usefulness of the new CBD morphological subtypes for predicting the outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for endoscopic CBD stone removal.
  7 in total

1.  Risk factors predictive of late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term (more than 10 years) follow-up study.

Authors:  Masanori Sugiyama; Yutaka Atomi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Does the bile duct angulation affect recurrence of choledocholithiasis?

Authors:  Dong Beom Seo; Byoung Wook Bang; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee; Shin Goo Park; Yong Sun Jeon; Jung Il Lee; Jin-Woo Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Identification of risk factors for stone recurrence after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Young Koog Cheon; Glen A Lehman
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.566

4.  Multiple recurrences after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones: A retrospective analysis of 976 cases.

Authors:  Yuki Kawaji; Hiroyuki Isayama; Yousuke Nakai; Kei Saito; Tatsuya Sato; Ryunosuke Hakuta; Tomotaka Saito; Naminatsu Takahara; Suguru Mizuno; Hirofumi Kogure; Saburo Matsubara; Minoru Tada; Masayuki Kitano; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.029

5.  Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy.

Authors:  T Ando; T Tsuyuguchi; T Okugawa; M Saito; T Ishihara; T Yamaguchi; H Saisho
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  New common bile duct morphological subtypes: Risk predictors of common bile duct stone recurrence.

Authors:  Xu Ji; Zhuo Yang; Shu-Ren Ma; Wen Jia; Qian Zhao; Lu Xu; Ying Kan; Yang Cao; Yao Wang; Bao-Jun Fan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-03-27

7.  Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer.

Authors:  Laura M Stinton; Eldon A Shaffer
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.519

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.