Literature DB >> 3615547

Environment-specific conditioning and sensitization with (+)-amphetamine.

E J Mazurski, R J Beninger.   

Abstract

Learning variables have an important role in determining the behavioral effects of some pharmacological treatments. Environmental control of sensitization and conditioning of the stimulant effects of (+)-amphetamine (AMPH) were studied in two experiments. Rats were given 6 1-hr habituation sessions in automated activity chambers conducted every second day. Two days later the 12 rats in the paired group in each study received AMPH (2.0 mg/kg) followed immediately by placement in the chambers for 1 hr whereas rats in the unpaired groups received saline. All rats were injected the following day and left in their home cages afterwards. At this time the paired groups received saline and the unpaired groups received AMPH. Three days later a second pairing and subsequent home cage injection was administered, using the same procedure. Immediately prior to the test session (4 days after the last pairing session) all rats in the sensitization experiment received AMPH and those in the conditioning study received saline. During pairing sessions AMPH treated rats exhibited more vertical activity than controls. On the saline test session in the conditioning study there was still a significant group difference demonstrating environment-specific conditioning. There was no evidence of sensitization on vertical activity; however, a significant difference in horizontal activity was seen on the AMPH test session. Results suggest that these two phenomena can be dissociated behaviorally and may not follow the same time-course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3615547     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(87)90477-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  7 in total

1.  Effects of selective drugs for dopaminergic D1 and D2 receptors on conditioned locomotion in rats.

Authors:  E J Mazurski; R J Beninger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Age and sex differences in the locomotor effect of repeated methylphenidate in rats classified as high or low novelty responders.

Authors:  T E Wooters; L P Dwoskin; M T Bardo
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Development and persistence of methamphetamine-conditioned hyperactivity in Swiss-Webster mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sean Rauhut; Victoria Bialecki
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  Importance of D(1) receptors for associative components of amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization and conditioned activity: a study using D(1) receptor knockout mice.

Authors:  Sanders A McDougall; Carmela M Reichel; Michelle C Cyr; Patrick E Karper; Arbi Nazarian; Cynthia A Crawford
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The development of sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine is enhanced in a novel environment.

Authors:  A Badiani; S G Anagnostaras; T E Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity does not result from a failure of rats to habituate to novelty.

Authors:  S H Ahmed; P Oberling; G Di Scala; G Sandner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Characterization of the associative nature of sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior and of the environment dependent placebo-like response.

Authors:  K L Drew; S D Glick
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.