RATIONALE: Repeated exposure to psychostimulant drugs results in conditioned activity and behavioral sensitization. Nonassociative cellular changes are necessary for behavioral sensitization, while associative processes appear to modify the sensitized response. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the absence of the D(1) receptor would disrupt associative processes modulating sensitization and conditioned activity. METHODS: Wild-type and D(1) receptor knockout mice (i.e., D(1)-deficient mice) were injected with amphetamine (AMPH; 8 mg/kg, IP) before being placed in a previously novel test chamber (AMPH-Test group) or before being returned to the home cage (AMPH-Home group). Separate groups of mice were injected with saline (SAL) at the same time points. Distance traveled was measured 60 min each day, with the preexposure phase lasting 1 or 7 days. Sensitization was subsequently assessed after an injection of AMPH (1 mg/kg, IP), while conditioned activity was assessed after an injection of SAL. RESULTS: After a 1-day preexposure phase, wild-type and D(1)-deficient mice exhibited similar patterns of sensitization and conditioned activity. After a 7-day preexposure phase, (1) D(1)-deficient mice exhibited more robust context-specific sensitization than wild-type mice, (2) only D(1)-deficient mice showed context-independent sensitization, and (3) only D(1)-deficient mice showed conditioned activity. CONCLUSIONS: Repeatedly treating D(1)-deficient mice with AMPH appears to cause a general increase in responsivity. The reason for this hyper-responsivity is uncertain, but it is possible that cues from the testing environment were unable to inhibit responding (i.e., associative processes were disrupted). Alternatively, compensatory mechanisms (e.g., increases in D(2)-like receptors) may affect processes underlying sensitization and conditioned activity.
RATIONALE: Repeated exposure to psychostimulant drugs results in conditioned activity and behavioral sensitization. Nonassociative cellular changes are necessary for behavioral sensitization, while associative processes appear to modify the sensitized response. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the absence of the D(1) receptor would disrupt associative processes modulating sensitization and conditioned activity. METHODS:Wild-type and D(1) receptor knockout mice (i.e., D(1)-deficient mice) were injected with amphetamine (AMPH; 8 mg/kg, IP) before being placed in a previously novel test chamber (AMPH-Test group) or before being returned to the home cage (AMPH-Home group). Separate groups of mice were injected with saline (SAL) at the same time points. Distance traveled was measured 60 min each day, with the preexposure phase lasting 1 or 7 days. Sensitization was subsequently assessed after an injection of AMPH (1 mg/kg, IP), while conditioned activity was assessed after an injection of SAL. RESULTS: After a 1-day preexposure phase, wild-type and D(1)-deficient mice exhibited similar patterns of sensitization and conditioned activity. After a 7-day preexposure phase, (1) D(1)-deficient mice exhibited more robust context-specific sensitization than wild-type mice, (2) only D(1)-deficient mice showed context-independent sensitization, and (3) only D(1)-deficient mice showed conditioned activity. CONCLUSIONS: Repeatedly treating D(1)-deficient mice with AMPH appears to cause a general increase in responsivity. The reason for this hyper-responsivity is uncertain, but it is possible that cues from the testing environment were unable to inhibit responding (i.e., associative processes were disrupted). Alternatively, compensatory mechanisms (e.g., increases in D(2)-like receptors) may affect processes underlying sensitization and conditioned activity.
Authors: Stephen C Fowler; Brenda Birkestrand; Rong Chen; Elena Vorontsova; Troy Zarcone Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2003-06-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: E D Schmidt; F J Tilders; A W Janszen; R Binnekade; T J De Vries; A N Schoffelmeer Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 1995-10-24 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Sanders A McDougall; Sergios Charntikov; Anthony M Cortez; Dionisio A Amodeo; Cynthia E Martinez; Cynthia A Crawford Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Sanders A McDougall; Olga O Kozanian; Venuz Y Greenfield; Leslie R Horn; Arnold Gutierrez; Alena Mohd-Yusof; Kevin A Castellanos Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Sanders A McDougall; Joseph A Pipkin; Taleen Der-Ghazarian; Anthony M Cortez; Arnold Gutierrez; Ryan J Lee; Sandra Carbajal; Alena Mohd-Yusof Journal: Behav Pharmacol Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.293
Authors: Sanders A McDougall; Anthony M Cortez; Alexandria G Palmer; Matthew S Herbert; Cynthia E Martinez; Sergios Charntikov; Dionisio A Amodeo Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Hong Zhu; Stefan Clemens; Michael Sawchuk; Shawn Hochman Journal: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 1.836