Literature DB >> 29940506

Visualizing convolutional neural network protein-ligand scoring.

Joshua Hochuli1, Alec Helbling1, Tamar Skaist1, Matthew Ragoza1, David Ryan Koes2.   

Abstract

Protein-ligand scoring is an important step in a structure-based drug design pipeline. Selecting a correct binding pose and predicting the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex enables effective virtual screening. Machine learning techniques can make use of the increasing amounts of structural data that are becoming publicly available. Convolutional neural network (CNN) scoring functions in particular have shown promise in pose selection and affinity prediction for protein-ligand complexes. Neural networks are known for being difficult to interpret. Understanding the decisions of a particular network can help tune parameters and training data to maximize performance. Visualization of neural networks helps decompose complex scoring functions into pictures that are more easily parsed by humans. Here we present three methods for visualizing how individual protein-ligand complexes are interpreted by 3D convolutional neural networks. We also present a visualization of the convolutional filters and their weights. We describe how the intuition provided by these visualizations aids in network design.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Molecular visualization; Protein-ligand scoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29940506      PMCID: PMC6343664          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2018.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Graph Model        ISSN: 1093-3263            Impact factor:   2.518


  24 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Yipin Lu; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-06-05       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  SFCscore(RF): a random forest-based scoring function for improved affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  David Zilian; Christoph A Sotriffer
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Predicting protein-ligand affinity with a random matrix framework.

Authors:  Alpha A Lee; Michael P Brenner; Lucy J Colwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions.

Authors:  Zhihai Liu; Minyi Su; Li Han; Jie Liu; Qifan Yang; Yan Li; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 22.384

5.  Predicting ligand binding modes from neural networks trained on protein-ligand interaction fingerprints.

Authors:  Vladimir Chupakhin; Gilles Marcou; Igor Baskin; Alexandre Varnek; Didier Rognan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Deep Learning Based Regression and Multiclass Models for Acute Oral Toxicity Prediction with Automatic Chemical Feature Extraction.

Authors:  Youjun Xu; Jianfeng Pei; Luhua Lai
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  KDEEP: Protein-Ligand Absolute Binding Affinity Prediction via 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  José Jiménez; Miha Škalič; Gerard Martínez-Rosell; Gianni De Fabritiis
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Lessons learned in empirical scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 benchmarking exercise.

Authors:  David Ryan Koes; Matthew P Baumgartner; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  NNScore 2.0: a neural-network receptor-ligand scoring function.

Authors:  Jacob D Durrant; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Machine-learning scoring functions for identifying native poses of ligands docked to known and novel proteins.

Authors:  Hossam M Ashtawy; Nihar R Mahapatra
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  13 in total

1.  Protein Science Meets Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and a Biochemical Meta-Analysis of an Inter-Field.

Authors:  Jalil Villalobos-Alva; Luis Ochoa-Toledo; Mario Javier Villalobos-Alva; Atocha Aliseda; Fernando Pérez-Escamirosa; Nelly F Altamirano-Bustamante; Francine Ochoa-Fernández; Ricardo Zamora-Solís; Sebastián Villalobos-Alva; Cristina Revilla-Monsalve; Nicolás Kemper-Valverde; Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-07

2.  Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction using Structure-Based Deep Learning: A Review.

Authors:  Rocco Meli; Garrett M Morris; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  Front Bioinform       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  A high quality, industrial data set for binding affinity prediction: performance comparison in different early drug discovery scenarios.

Authors:  Andreas Tosstorff; Markus G Rudolph; Jason C Cole; Michael Reutlinger; Christian Kramer; Hervé Schaffhauser; Agnès Nilly; Alexander Flohr; Bernd Kuhn
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 4.179

4.  Artificial intelligence and inflammatory bowel disease: practicalities and future prospects.

Authors:  Johanne Brooks-Warburton; James Ashton; Anjan Dhar; Tony Tham; Patrick B Allen; Sami Hoque; Laurence B Lovat; Shaji Sebastian
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-10

5.  Convolutional neural network scoring and minimization in the D3R 2017 community challenge.

Authors:  Jocelyn Sunseri; Jonathan E King; Paul G Francoeur; David Ryan Koes
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Lieyang Chen; Anthony Cruz; Steven Ramsey; Callum J Dickson; Jose S Duca; Viktor Hornak; David R Koes; Tom Kurtzman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Learning protein-ligand binding affinity with atomic environment vectors.

Authors:  Rocco Meli; Andrew Anighoro; Mike J Bodkin; Garrett M Morris; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 5.514

8.  GNINA 1.0: molecular docking with deep learning.

Authors:  Andrew T McNutt; Paul Francoeur; Rishal Aggarwal; Tomohide Masuda; Rocco Meli; Matthew Ragoza; Jocelyn Sunseri; David Ryan Koes
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.514

9.  Improving the Virtual Screening Ability of Target-Specific Scoring Functions Using Deep Learning Methods.

Authors:  Dingyan Wang; Chen Cui; Xiaoyu Ding; Zhaoping Xiong; Mingyue Zheng; Xiaomin Luo; Hualiang Jiang; Kaixian Chen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Revealing cytotoxic substructures in molecules using deep learning.

Authors:  Henry E Webel; Talia B Kimber; Silke Radetzki; Martin Neuenschwander; Marc Nazaré; Andrea Volkamer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.