Claudio Hadid1,2,3,4, Leonardo Celano5,6, Darío Di Toro5,6, Edgar Antezana-Chavez5, Sebastián Gallino7, Gustavo Iralde8, David Calvo9, Pablo Ávila10,11, Leonardo Atea12, Sergio Gonzalez13, Sebastián Maldonado14, Carlos Labadet5,6. 1. Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich, Pi y Margall 750, 1155, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. claudio.hadid@gmail.com. 2. Hospital Universitario CEMIC, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. claudio.hadid@gmail.com. 3. Sanatorio Garat, Concordia, Entre Ríos, Argentina. claudio.hadid@gmail.com. 4. Cardiovascular Chivilcoy, Chivilcoy, Buenos Aires, Argentina. claudio.hadid@gmail.com. 5. Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich, Pi y Margall 750, 1155, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 6. Hospital Universitario CEMIC, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 7. Sanatorio Garat, Concordia, Entre Ríos, Argentina. 8. Cardiovascular Chivilcoy, Chivilcoy, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 9. Arrhythmia Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain. 10. Cardiology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain. 11. Centre for Biomedical Research in Cardiovascular Disease Network (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain. 12. Sanatorio del Salvador, Córdoba, Argentina. 13. Instituto de Cardiología, Tucumán, Argentina. 14. Hospital Prof. Dr. Juan Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis between orthodromic atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) and atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (aAVNRT) is sometimes challenging. We hypothesize that aAVNRTs have more variability in the retrograde conduction time at tachycardia onset than AVRTs. METHODS: We aimed to assess the variability in retrograde conduction time at tachycardia onset in AVRT and aAVNRT and to propose a new diagnostic tool to differentiate these two arrhythmia mechanisms. We measured the VA interval of the first beats after tachycardia induction until it stabilized. The difference between the maximum and minimum VA intervals (∆VA) and the number of beats needed for the VA interval to stabilize was analyzed. Atrial tachycardias were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients with aAVNRT (n = 37) or AVRT (n = 64) were included. Six additional patients with decremental accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia (DAPT) were analyzed separately. All aAVNRTs had VA interval variability. The median ∆VA was 0 (0 - 5) ms in AVRTs vs 40 (21 - 55) ms in aAVNRTs (p < 0.001). The VA interval stabilized significantly earlier in AVRTs (median 1.5 [1 - 3] beats) than in aAVNRTs (5 [4 - 7] beats; p < 0.001). A ∆VA < 10 ms accurately differentiated AVRT from aAVNRT with 100% of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. The stabilization of the VA interval at < 3 beats of the tachycardia onset identified AVRT with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 64.1%, 94.6%, 95.3%, and 60.3%, respectively. A ∆VA < 20 ms yielded good diagnostic accuracy for DAPT. CONCLUSIONS: A ∆VA < 10 ms is a simple and useful criterion that accurately distinguished AVRT from atypical AVNRT. Central panel: Scatter plot showing individual values of ∆VA in atypical AVNRT and AVRT. Left panel: induction of atypical AVNRT. The VA interval stabilizes at the 5th beat and the ∆VA is 62 ms (maximum VA interval: 172 ms - minimum VA interval: 110 ms). Right panel: induction of AVRT. The tachycardia has a fixed VA interval from the first beat. ∆VA is 0 ms.
BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis between orthodromic atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) and atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (aAVNRT) is sometimes challenging. We hypothesize that aAVNRTs have more variability in the retrograde conduction time at tachycardia onset than AVRTs. METHODS: We aimed to assess the variability in retrograde conduction time at tachycardia onset in AVRT and aAVNRT and to propose a new diagnostic tool to differentiate these two arrhythmia mechanisms. We measured the VA interval of the first beats after tachycardia induction until it stabilized. The difference between the maximum and minimum VA intervals (∆VA) and the number of beats needed for the VA interval to stabilize was analyzed. Atrial tachycardias were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients with aAVNRT (n = 37) or AVRT (n = 64) were included. Six additional patients with decremental accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia (DAPT) were analyzed separately. All aAVNRTs had VA interval variability. The median ∆VA was 0 (0 - 5) ms in AVRTs vs 40 (21 - 55) ms in aAVNRTs (p < 0.001). The VA interval stabilized significantly earlier in AVRTs (median 1.5 [1 - 3] beats) than in aAVNRTs (5 [4 - 7] beats; p < 0.001). A ∆VA < 10 ms accurately differentiated AVRT from aAVNRT with 100% of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. The stabilization of the VA interval at < 3 beats of the tachycardia onset identified AVRT with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 64.1%, 94.6%, 95.3%, and 60.3%, respectively. A ∆VA < 20 ms yielded good diagnostic accuracy for DAPT. CONCLUSIONS: A ∆VA < 10 ms is a simple and useful criterion that accurately distinguished AVRT from atypical AVNRT. Central panel: Scatter plot showing individual values of ∆VA in atypical AVNRT and AVRT. Left panel: induction of atypical AVNRT. The VA interval stabilizes at the 5th beat and the ∆VA is 62 ms (maximum VA interval: 172 ms - minimum VA interval: 110 ms). Right panel: induction of AVRT. The tachycardia has a fixed VA interval from the first beat. ∆VA is 0 ms.
Authors: G F Michaud; H Tada; S Chough; R Baker; K Wasmer; C Sticherling; H Oral; F Pelosi; B P Knight; S A Strickberger; F Morady Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: B P Knight; M Ebinger; H Oral; M H Kim; C Sticherling; F Pelosi; G F Michaud; S A Strickberger; F Morady Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: K Hirao; K Otomo; X Wang; K J Beckman; J H McClelland; L Widman; M D Gonzalez; M Arruda; H Nakagawa; R Lazzara; W M Jackman Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-09-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J D Martínez-Alday; J Almendral; A Arenal; J M Ormaetxe; A Pastor; J P Villacastín; O Medina; R Peinado; J L Delcán Journal: Circulation Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Esteban González-Torrecilla; Jesús Almendral; Francisco J García-Fernández; Miguel A Arias; Angel Arenal; Felipe Atienza; Tomás Datino; Leonardo F Atea; David Calvo; Marta Pachón; Francisco Fernández-Avilés Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2011-03-08
Authors: Vivek Y Reddy; Krit Jongnarangsin; Christine M Albert; Hani Sabbour; David Keane; Theofanie Mela; Brian McGovern; Jeremy N Ruskin Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2003-12
Authors: J M Ormaetxe; J Almendral; A Arenal; J D Martínez-Alday; A Pastor; J P Villacastín; J L Delcán Journal: Circulation Date: 1993-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Oliver R Segal; Lorne J Gula; Allan C Skanes; Andrew D Krahn; Raymond Yee; George J Klein Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-01-06 Impact factor: 6.343