Literature DB >> 36152053

Neutral auditory words immediately followed by painful electric shock may show reduced next-day recollection.

Caroline M Norton1, James W Ibinson1,2, Samantha J Pcola1, Vencislav Popov3,4, Joshua J Tremel5, Lynne M Reder3,4, Julie A Fiez3,5,6, Keith M Vogt7,8,9.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effect of experimentally delivered acute pain on memory. Twenty-five participants participated in experimental sessions on consecutive days. The first session involved a categorization task to encourage memory encoding. There were two conditions, presented in randomized order, in which participants listened to a series of words, which were repeated three times. In one condition, one-third of the word items were immediately followed by a painful electrical shock. This word-shock pairing was consistent across repetition and the pain-paired items were presented unpredictably. In the other condition, all word items were not associated with pain. Response times over these repeated presentations were assessed for differences. Explicit memory was tested the following day, employing a Remember-Know assessment of word recognition, with no shocks employed. We found evidence that recollection may be reduced for pain-paired words, as the proportion of correct Remember responses (out of total correct responses) was significantly lower. There were no significant reductions in memory for non-pain items that followed painful stimulation after a period of several seconds. Consistent with the experience of pain consuming working memory resources, we theorize that painful shocks interrupt memory encoding for the immediately preceding experimental items, due to a shift in attention away from the word item.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory; Electric nerve stimulation; Memory; Pain; Recognition

Year:  2022        PMID: 36152053     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06467-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  16 in total

Review 1.  Working memory.

Authors:  Alan Baddeley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Effects of modality on the neural correlates of encoding processes supporting recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Lauren J Gottlieb; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory.

Authors:  N W Mulligan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  Measuring recollection and familiarity: Improving the remember/know procedure.

Authors:  Ellen M Migo; Andrew R Mayes; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2012-07-28

5.  Effects of a force production task and a working memory task on pain perception.

Authors:  Tiffany A Paris; Gaurav Misra; Derek B Archer; Stephen A Coombes
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 6.  Frequency effects on memory: A resource-limited theory.

Authors:  Vencislav Popov; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Experimental pain impairs recognition memory irrespective of pain predictability.

Authors:  K Forkmann; K Schmidt; H Schultz; T Sommer; U Bingel
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  Timing and gender determine if acute pain impairs working memory performance.

Authors:  Anna Hood; Kim Pulvers; Thomas J Spady
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  Psychometric and electrodermal activity data from an experimental paradigm of memory encoding with some items periodically followed by painful electric shock.

Authors:  Ally T Citro; Caroline M Norton; Samantha J Pcola; Keith M Vogt
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2020-05-08

10.  Pain Catastrophizing Mediates and Moderates the Link Between Acute Pain and Working Memory.

Authors:  Philip M Procento; Kevin L Rand; Jesse C Stewart; Adam T Hirsh
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.