Literature DB >> 24055565

Effects of a force production task and a working memory task on pain perception.

Tiffany A Paris1, Gaurav Misra, Derek B Archer, Stephen A Coombes.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The goal in the current study was to examine the analgesic effects of a pinch grip-force production task and a working memory task when pain-eliciting thermal stimulation was delivered simultaneously to the left or right hand during task performance. Control conditions for visual distraction and thermal stimulation were included, and force performance measures and working memory performance measures were collected and analyzed. Our experiments revealed 3 novel findings. First, we showed that accurate isometric force contractions elicit an analgesic effect when pain-eliciting thermal stimulation was delivered during task performance. Second, the magnitude of the analgesic effect was not different when the pain-eliciting stimulus was delivered to the left or right hand during the force task or the working memory task. Third, we found no correlation between analgesia scores during the force task and the working memory task. Our findings have clinical implications for rehabilitation settings because they suggest that acute force production by one limb influences pain perception that is simultaneously experienced in another limb. From a theoretical perspective, we interpret our findings on force and memory driven analgesia in the context of a centralized pain inhibitory response. PERSPECTIVE: This article shows that force production and working memory have analgesic effects irrespective of which side of the body pain is experienced on. Analgesia scores were not correlated, however, suggesting that some individuals experience more pain relief from a force task as compared to a working memory task and vice versa.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Force; analgesia; cognition; muscle contraction; pain; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24055565     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  6 in total

1.  Automated classification of pain perception using high-density electroencephalography data.

Authors:  Gaurav Misra; Wei-En Wang; Derek B Archer; Arnab Roy; Stephen A Coombes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Pain-Related Suppression of Beta Oscillations Facilitates Voluntary Movement.

Authors:  Gaurav Misra; Edward Ofori; Jae Woo Chung; Stephen A Coombes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Neutral auditory words immediately followed by painful electric shock may show reduced next-day recollection.

Authors:  Caroline M Norton; James W Ibinson; Samantha J Pcola; Vencislav Popov; Joshua J Tremel; Lynne M Reder; Julie A Fiez; Keith M Vogt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Nonlinear Effects of Noxious Thermal Stimulation and Working Memory Demands on Subjective Pain Perception.

Authors:  John A Sturgeon; Meghan M Tieu; Laura E Jastrzab; Rebecca McCue; Vanisha Gandhi; Sean C Mackey
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.637

5.  Dose-response effect of isometric force production on the perception of pain.

Authors:  Gaurav Misra; Tiffany A Paris; Derek B Archer; Stephen A Coombes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  When Less Is More: Investigating Factors Influencing the Distraction Effect of Virtual Reality From Pain.

Authors:  Katharina Barcatta; Elisabeth Holl; Layla Battistutta; Marian van der Meulen; Katharina M Rischer
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.