Literature DB >> 36151456

Working memory and reaction time variability mediate the relationship between polygenic risk and ADHD traits in a general population sample.

Aurina Arnatkeviciute1, Mark A Bellgrove2, Mia Moses1, Jeggan Tiego1, Ditte Demontis3,4,5, G Bragi Walters6, Hreinn Stefansson6, Kari Stefansson6, Anders D Børglum3,4,5.   

Abstract

Endophenotypes are heritable and quantifiable traits indexing genetic liability for a disorder. Here, we examined three potential endophenotypes, working memory function, response inhibition, and reaction time variability, for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) measured as a dimensional latent trait in a large general population sample derived from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM Study. The genetic risk for ADHD was estimated using polygenic risk scores (PRS) whereas ADHD traits were quantified as a dimensional continuum using Bartlett factor score estimates, derived from Attention Problems items from the Child Behaviour Checklist and Effortful Control items from the Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire-Revised. The three candidate cognitive endophenotypes were quantified using task-based performance measures. Higher ADHD PRSs were associated with higher ADHD traits, as well as poorer working memory performance and increased reaction time variability. Lower working memory performance, poorer response inhibition, and increased reaction time variability were associated with more pronounced ADHD traits. Working memory and reaction time variability partially statistically mediated the relationship between ADHD PRS and ADHD traits, explaining 14% and 16% of the association, respectively. The mediation effect was specific to the genetic risk for ADHD and did not generalise to genetic risk for four other major psychiatric disorders. Together, these findings provide robust evidence from a large general population sample that working memory and reaction time variability can be considered endophenotypes for ADHD that mediate the relationship between ADHD PRS and ADHD traits.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36151456     DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01775-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Psychiatry        ISSN: 1359-4184            Impact factor:   13.437


  74 in total

1.  Genome-Wide Association Studies of Impulsive Personality Traits (BIS-11 and UPPS-P) and Drug Experimentation in up to 22,861 Adult Research Participants Identify Loci in the CACNA1I and CADM2 genes.

Authors:  Sandra Sanchez-Roige; Pierre Fontanillas; Sarah L Elson; Joshua C Gray; Harriet de Wit; James MacKillop; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The cognitive genetics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): sustained attention as a candidate phenotype.

Authors:  Mark A Bellgrove; Ziarih Hawi; Michael Gill; Ian H Robertson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 3.  The molecular genetic architecture of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Z Hawi; T D R Cummins; J Tong; B Johnson; R Lau; W Samarrai; M A Bellgrove
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 4.  Endophenotypes in the genetic analyses of mental disorders.

Authors:  Tyrone D Cannon; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 18.561

Review 5.  Characterizing cognition in ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction.

Authors:  F Xavier Castellanos; Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke; Michael P Milham; Rosemary Tannock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Research review: Polygenic methods and their application to psychiatric traits.

Authors:  Naomi R Wray; Sang Hong Lee; Divya Mehta; Anna A E Vinkhuyzen; Frank Dudbridge; Christel M Middeldorp
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 7.  The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites.

Authors:  B J Casey; Tariq Cannonier; May I Conley; Alexandra O Cohen; Deanna M Barch; Mary M Heitzeg; Mary E Soules; Theresa Teslovich; Danielle V Dellarco; Hugh Garavan; Catherine A Orr; Tor D Wager; Marie T Banich; Nicole K Speer; Matthew T Sutherland; Michael C Riedel; Anthony S Dick; James M Bjork; Kathleen M Thomas; Bader Chaarani; Margie H Mejia; Donald J Hagler; M Daniela Cornejo; Chelsea S Sicat; Michael P Harms; Nico U F Dosenbach; Monica Rosenberg; Eric Earl; Hauke Bartsch; Richard Watts; Jonathan R Polimeni; Joshua M Kuperman; Damien A Fair; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 6.464

Review 8.  Ten years of enhancing neuro-imaging genetics through meta-analysis: An overview from the ENIGMA Genetics Working Group.

Authors:  Sarah E Medland; Katrina L Grasby; Neda Jahanshad; Jodie N Painter; Lucía Colodro-Conde; Janita Bralten; Derrek P Hibar; Penelope A Lind; Fabrizio Pizzagalli; Sophia I Thomopoulos; Jason L Stein; Barbara Franke; Nicholas G Martin; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Endophenotypes in psychiatric disease: prospects and challenges.

Authors:  William G Iacono
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 10.  Genetics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Stephen V Faraone; Henrik Larsson
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 15.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.