| Literature DB >> 36149305 |
Özcan Budak1, Mehmet Süha Bostancı2, Osman Köse3, Hüseyin Çakıroğlu4, Özkan Durmaz2, Erdem Çokluk5.
Abstract
Objective: Ovarian torsion decreases ovarian reserve because of ischemic and reperfusion damage it causes. In this study, we investigated the protective effect of cilostazol (CIL) on experimental ischemia (I) and ischemic-reperfusion (I/R) damage in rat ovaries with in vitro fertilization (IVF) results. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Reperfusion injuries; cilostazol; in vitro fertilization; ovarian torsion
Year: 2022 PMID: 36149305 PMCID: PMC9511933 DOI: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.29599
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Turk J Obstet Gynecol ISSN: 2149-9330
Figure 1A comparison of the study groups’ total oocyte count, germinal vesicle (GV), metaphase I (MI), metaphase II (MII) oocyte counts, and second-day embryo counts. Statistical analysis between all groups was performed with a Kruskal-Wallis test. Pairwise comparisons were made with the Mann-Whitney test. The black cylinder indicates the statistically significant difference between the sham (S) and S+ (cilostazol) CIL groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the black star, triangle, circle and plus sign ischemia (I) and I + CIL groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the black pentegon, cross, equalitiy and rectangle ischemia reperfusion (I/R) and I/R + CIL groups
Figure 2Comparison of second day embryos between groups. Second-day embryos of the groups are seen at 100 x magnification. The second-day embryo counts and embryo quality in the sham (S) and S+ cilostazol (CIL) groups were quite good compared to the other groups. It is seen that the quality and number of embryos on the second day are significantly better in the Ischemia (I) + CIL and ischemia reperfusion (I/R) + CIL groups compared to the I and I/R groups, respectively
Figure 3Comparison of Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels after cilostazol administration between groups via an AMH1 and AMH2 correlation plot between the sham (S) + cilostazol (CIL), Ischemia (I) + CIL and Ischemia reperfusion (I/R) + CIL groups (mean and 95% confidence interval). There was no correlation between AMH1 and AMH2 values in the S + CIL group (P>0.05). A high level of correlation was observed between AMH1 and AMH2 values in the I + SI and I/R + SI groups. Analysis was done with a paired sample test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant