Literature DB >> 36148393

The effects of immediate recall and subsequent retrieval strategy on eyewitness memory.

Jennifer Ma1, Helen M Paterson1, Misia Temler1.   

Abstract

The current study investigated the effects of immediate recall and subsequent interview on mock witnesses' memory of a crime. After watching a video of a crime, 111 participants were randomly allocated to an immediate recall condition (the iWitnessed mobile app, free recall). One week later, participants were randomly allocated to a retrieval condition (timeline aid, category clustering recall, free recall). Results showed that iWitnessed elicited more correct details than free recall at immediate recall (Time 1), without compromising accuracy. However, the immediate recall tool did not affect memory performance at a one-week delay (Time 2). At Time 2, participants with retrieval support (timeline aid, category clustering recall) reported more details than those with no retrieval support (free recall), without compromising accuracy. The findings highlight that high-quality immediate recall and retrieval support during a subsequent interview are necessary to elicit more complete and accurate accounts.
© 2021 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eyewitness memory; eyewitness recall; immediate recall; interviewing; retrieval strategy

Year:  2021        PMID: 36148393      PMCID: PMC9487976          DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1976303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law        ISSN: 1321-8719


  21 in total

1.  False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: effects of retention interval and level of processing.

Authors:  A Thapar; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

Review 2.  Levels of processing: past, present. and future?

Authors:  Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2002 Sep-Nov

3.  A categorically postcategorical interpretation of the modality effect: a reply to Nilsson.

Authors:  M J Watkins; O C Watkins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1975-11

4.  Protecting eyewitness evidence: examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool.

Authors:  Fiona Gabbert; Lorraine Hope; Ronald P Fisher
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2008-06-17

5.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

6.  The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking.

Authors:  Pam A Mueller; Daniel M Oppenheimer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-04-23

7.  Visual communication desensitization (VCD©): a novel two-phased approach to interviewing traumatized individuals in investigative contexts.

Authors:  Jane Mary Castelfranc-Allen; Lorraine Hope
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2018-07-02

8.  Alcohol and recall: state-dependent effects in man.

Authors:  D W Goodwin; B Powell; D Bremer; H Hoine; J Stern
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  False memories for missing aspects of traumatic events.

Authors:  Deryn Strange; Melanie K T Takarangi
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-10-17

10.  Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus' Forgetting Curve.

Authors:  Jaap M J Murre; Joeri Dros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.