| Literature DB >> 36147634 |
Yanyan Fang1,2, Jian Liu1,3, Ling Xin1, Hui Jiang1, Jinchen Guo4, Xu Li1,3, Fanfan Wang1,3, Mingyu He1,3, Qi Han1,3, Dan Huang1,3.
Abstract
Radix Salvia miltiorrhiza (RSM) is widely used for the clinical improvement of inflammatory diseases. However, the actions of RSM in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have not been fully explored. Therefore, this study was designed to use retrospective clinical data mining approach to understand the effects of RSM on AS-related immuno-inflammatory processes, use network pharmacology to predict therapeutic targets of RSM, and to further investigate the pharmacological molecular mechanism in vitro. RSM treatment has a long-term correlation with the improvement of AS-related immuno-inflammatory indicators through computational models. We established protein-protein interaction networks, conducted KEGG analysis to enrich significant TNF pathways, and finally obtained three core targets of RSM in the treatment of AS, namely, prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Screening of RSM active ingredients with node degree greater than 20 yielded cryptotanshinone and tanshinone IIA, and previous studies have reported their anti-inflammatory effects. In vitro, both cryptotanshinone and tanshinone IIA significantly inhibited the expressions of PTGS2, IL-6, and TNF-α in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in AS patients. In conclusion, cryptotanshinone and tanshinone IIA, which are the active components of RSM, may inhibit the activation of TNF signaling pathway in AS patients by downregulating the expression of PTGS2, IL-6, and TNF-α. These findings illustrate that RSM may be a promising therapeutic candidate for AS, but further validation is required.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36147634 PMCID: PMC9489373 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3816258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Changes in immune-inflammatory indices after treatment with RSM (n = 2074).
| Before treatment | After treatment |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESR [median (Q1, Q3), mm/h] | 28.00 (14.00, 49.00) | 21.00 (12.00, 37.00) | ≤0.001 | -16.986 |
| CRP [median (Q1, Q3), mg/L] | 18.215 (5.44, 38.70) | 8.025 (1.90, 21.2125) | ≤0.001 | -21.266 |
| IgA [median (Q1, Q3), g/L] | 2.59 (1.87, 3.51) | 2.44 (1.81, 3.305) | ≤0.001 | -10.594 |
| IgM [median (Q1, Q3), g/L] | 1.13 (0.825, 1.48) | 1.13 (0.84, 1.50) | 0.359 | -.916 |
| IgG [median (Q1, Q3), g/L] | 13.07 (10.68, 15.80) | 12.51 (10.30, 15.00) | ≤0.001 | -9.013 |
| C3 [median (Q1, Q3), g/L] | 120.50 (81.20, 139.50) | 111.50 (75.95, 129.80) | ≤0.001 | -11.391 |
| C4 [median (Q1, Q3), g/L] | 28.50 (16.25, 35.80) | 24.60 (14.15, 31.05) | ≤0.001 | -16.504 |
Note: ESR: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP: C-reactive protein; IgA: immunoglobulin A; IgM: immunoglobulin M; IgG: immunoglobulin G; C3: complement component 3; C4: complement component 4. p value is based on the comparison between levels before and after treatment. Z is the standardized test statistics before and after treatment.
Association between RSM and immuno-inflammation indices.
| Drug | Clinical indices | Support (%) | Confidence (%) | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSM | CPR | 25.422 | 100 | 3.934 |
| RSM | ESR | 32.176 | 100 | 3.108 |
| RSM | IgA | 61.891 | 100 | 1.616 |
| RSM | IgG | 61.891 | 100 | 1.616 |
| RSM | C3 | 61.891 | 100 | 1.616 |
| RSM | C4 | 61.891 | 100 | 1.616 |
RSM: Radix Salvia miltiorrhiza; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP: C-reactive protein; IgA: immunoglobulin A; IgG: immunoglobulin G; C3: complement component 3; C4: complement component 4.
Figure 1Random walking model of immuno-inflammatory indices in AS patients.
Figure 2RSM-diseases-active ingredients of RSM-target network. RSM: Radix Salvia miltiorrhiza.
Figure 3Venn diagram of Radix Salvia miltiorrhiza and disease-related targets. RSM (Radix Salvia miltiorrhiza) represents Radix Salvia miltiorrhiza targets, and AS (ankylosing spondylitis) represents disease-related targets.
Figure 4(a) The PPI network of Radix Salvia miltiorrhiza in the treatment of AS and (b) the identified core targets. The darker the color, the higher was the degree of interaction.
Figure 5The results of KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for the activities of RSM in patients with AS. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; RSM: Radix Salvia miltiorrhiza; AS: ankylosing spondylitis.
Figure 6The binding energies of the chemically active RSM ingredients and the key target proteins. RSM: Radix Salvia miltiorrhiza.
Figure 7The docking patterns of the inflammatory targets of the network and the lowest components of their binding energies. (a) The docking diagram of cryptotanshinone (MOL007088) and PTGS2 (5f19). (b) The docking diagram of tanshinone IIA (MOL007154) and PTGS2 (5f19). (c) The docking diagram of cryptotanshinone (MOL007088) and IL-6 (4ni7). (d) The docking diagram of tanshinone IIA (MOL007154) and IL-6 (4ni7). (e) The docking diagram of cryptotanshinone (MOL007088) and TNF (5uui). (f) The docking diagram of tanshinone IIA (MOL007154) and TNF (5uui).
Figure 8Effects of cryptotanshinone and tanshinone IIA on PTGS2, IL-6, and TNF-α protein expression. (a) Visual protein expression levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the healthy control group (HC), nontreatment group (NT), AS+cryptotanshinone group (AS+cryptotanshinone), and AS+tanshinone IIA group (AS+tanshinone IIA). (b) Quantitative expression of PTGS2 (COX2) in each group. (c) Quantitative expression of IL-6 in each group. (d) Quantitative expression of TNF-α in each group. Data are represented as means ± SD. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01, compared with the normal control group. #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01, compared with the NT group. The experiments were independently repeated at least three times.