| Literature DB >> 34880852 |
Chaojie Yu1, Xinli Zhan1, Tuo Liang1, Liyi Chen1, Zide Zhang1, Jie Jiang1, Jiang Xue1, Jiarui Chen1, Chong Liu1.
Abstract
Background: The pathogenesis of Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has not been elucidated, especially involving hip joint disease. The purpose of this study was to analyze the proteome of diseased hip in AS and to identify key protein biomarkers. Material andEntities:
Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis; bioinformatics; myeloperoxidase; phagosome; proteomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34880852 PMCID: PMC8647161 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.572592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1(A) AS group: a patient with AS, 28 years old, male, BMI: 15.34, ESR: 41 mm/h, HLA-B27 (+); (B) No-AS group: a patient with aseptic femoral head necrosis, 43 years old, male, BMI: 24.564, ESR: 63 mm/h.
Clinical information of patients of the two groups.
| AS group n = 6 | No-AS group n = 6 | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 34.167 ± 10.362 | 48.333 ± 11.272 | 0.050* |
| Gender (M / F) | 3 / 3 | 3 / 3 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.692 ± 10.286 | 21.725 ± 4.141 | 0.835 |
| ESR (mm/h) | 58.000 ± 25.581 | 53.667 ± 31.910 | 0.808 |
| Neutrophils in blood (*10^9/L) | 5.708 ± 1.240 | 7.045 ± 3.994 | 0.452 |
| Lymphocyte in blood (*10^9/L) | 1.865 ± 0.882 | 1.443 ± 0.406 | 0.323 |
| HLA-B27 (+) | 6 | 0 |
*Compared with Easy group, P < 0.05.
Statistical results of polypeptides and proteins.
| Count | |
|---|---|
| Total polypeptide | 36,639 |
| Total protein | 3,755 |
| Quantifiable protein | 3,489 |
| Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) | 193 |
Figure 2Active volcano map of proteins, screening criteria of DEPs: P.value<0.05 and Log|logFC|>1. Red dots represent upregulated proteins, and the green dots represent downregulated proteins. Gray dots mean these proteins do not satisfy the screening criteria. X-axis represents Log2|FC|, and the y-axis represents -Log10|P-value|.
Figure 3Heat map of the DEPs between AS (A1–A6) and No-AS (B1–B6) groups. Red areas are the upregulated proteins, and the blue areas are the downregulated proteins.
Figure 4Top 10 GO enrichment analysis of DEPs. Function of the DEGs in tissues is described according to its GO characteristics (Biological process, Molecular function, Cell components). -Log10 (p. adj.value) < 0.05 and count of gene is > = 3.
Figure 5KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEPs. Four pathways and associated DEPs are shown. Dot: protein. Circulation: KEGG pathway. Circle size: the smaller the P value, the bigger the circle. Area of the color in circle represents the percentage of associated DEPs in the Circle proteins.
Figure 6DEPs in the PPI networks are visualized by the Cytoscape. Red balls represent the upregulated proteins, and the blue diamonds represent the downregulated proteins.
Figure 7Top 30 hub proteins were obtained respectively by Degree and Closeness method in CytoHubba. (A) Hub proteins in Degree method, (B) hub proteins in Closeness method.
DEPs in the KEGG pathways, Degree method, and Closeness method.
| Degree method | Closeness method | 4 KEGG pathways |
|---|---|---|
| VPS35, HIST2H3PS2, H6PD, PTBP1, ELANE, MPO, NUDT21, PKLR, VPS33A, HNRNPH1 | VPS35, ARCN1, RPL18A, MPO, SRP54, CDIPT, PKLR, HIST2H3PS2, SEC24D, ELANE | H6PD, RPIA, TKT, PLOD1, PLOD2, PLOD3, SETD7, CDIPT, GPD1, LYPLA2, PHOSPHO1, PLD3, ATP6V1C1, CTSS, DYNC1LI2, ITGB5, MPO, MRC2, TUBB, TUBB2B, TUBB3 |
Figure 8Proteins intersection map of KEGG pathways, Degree method and Closeness method.
Figure 9The role of MPO in phagolysosome. Overexpression of the MPO is shown in red.
Figure 10The cells were isolated from the tissue, cultured, and then transfected (A). Western blot analysis showed that the expression of MPO in AS group was higher than that in NO-AS group (P < 0.05) (B). After transfection, the mRNA and protein expressions of MPO in siRNA-MPO group were lower than those in siRNA-NC group (P < 0.05) (C, D). ELISA analysis showed that the expression levels of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α in AS group were higher than those in NO-AS group (P < 0.05). The expression levels of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α in siRNA-MPO group were lower than those in siRNA-NC group (P < 0.05) (E). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.