| Literature DB >> 36141743 |
Won-Seok Kim1, Kiyun Park2, Jae-Won Park1, Sun-Ho Lee1, Ji-Hoon Kim1, Yong-Jun Kim1, Gun-Hee Oh1, Bong-Soon Ko1, Ji-Won Park1, Cheol Hong1, Tae-Sik Yu2, Ihn-Sil Kwak1,2.
Abstract
Pale chub (Zacco platypus) is a dominant species in urban rivers and reservoirs, and it is used as an indicator to monitor the effects of environmental contaminants. Gene responses at the molecular level can reflect the health of fish challenged with environmental stressors. The objective of this study was to identify correlations between water quality factors and the expression of stress-related genes in Z. platypus from different lake environments (Singal and Juam Lakes). To do so, transcriptional responses of genes involving cellular homeostasis (heat-shock protein 70, HSP70; heat-shock protein 90, HSP90), metal detoxification (metallothionein, MT), and antioxidation (superoxide dismutase, SOD; catalase, CAT) were analyzed in the gill and liver tissues of Z. platypus. HSP70, HSP90, and MT genes were overall upregulated in Z. platypus from Singal Lake, which suffered from poorer water quality than Juam Lake. In addition, gene responses were significantly higher in Singal Lake outflow. Upregulation of HSP70, HSP90, and MT was significantly higher in Z. platypus gills than in the liver tissue. In addition, integrated biomarker response and heatmap analysis determined correlations between expression of biomarker genes or water quality factors and sampling sites of both lakes. These results suggest that stress-related genes used as multiple biomarkers may reflect spatial characteristics and water quality of different lake environments, and they can be used for biomonitoring and ecological risk assessment.Entities:
Keywords: Zacco platypus; integrated biomarker response; lake environment; stress-related genes; transcriptional expression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36141743 PMCID: PMC9517483 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Location of the study area and sampling sites (Black line: 1 km).
List of specific primers used for quantitative real-time PCR.
| Gene | Primer | Tm (°C) | Efficiency (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| F: ACGCGGAAGGCCATACC | 53 | 90 | Kim and Jung, 2016 [ |
| R: GGCTGTGGGCAAAGTCATTC | ||||
|
| F: CCTCAATGGTCCTGGTGAAG | 61 | 96 | KY926431 |
| R: TCACCTTCTGCCCCAGATAA | ||||
|
| F: TGGTGTGGGCTTCTACTCTG | 60 | 88 | KM201321 |
| R: CCCTCTTCTCCTCGACGTAC | ||||
|
| F: GAAGGAGGATGACTTGGGTAAGG | 62 | 90 | KF515699 |
| R: CCGGCGTTGCCAGTTTTA | ||||
|
| F: AAATCCGCAGACTCACCTAAA | 53 | 89 | KF515698 |
| R: GGACGCAAACCCCAGAAA | ||||
|
| F: GATTGCGCCAAGACTGGAA | 60 | 91 | KC952875 |
| R: CTGGCAGTTAGTGCACTTGCA |
Hydrological and physicochemical factors in each lake.
| Lake | Hydrological Factors | Physicochemical Factors | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basin Area | Reservoir Area | Maximum Water | Place | Depth | WT | Do | pH | EC (µmhos/cm) | COD | TOC | TN | Chl-a | NO3-N | NH3-N | DTOC | |
| Singal | 53 | 2.3 | 46 | Inflow (I) | 0.4 | 17.4 | 12.9 | 8.3 | 723.0 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 5.2 | 2.9 | 0.1 | 2.8 |
| Middle (M) | 5.0 | 19.4 | 15.1 | 8.1 | 439.3 | 5.9 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 21.3 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 3.1 | ||||
| Outflow (O) | 0.5 | 17.1 | 11.8 | 8.3 | 273.0 | 6.0 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 19.1 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 3.3 | ||||
| Average | 5.9 | 18.0 | 13.3 | 8.2 | 478.4 | 5.4 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 15.2 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 3.1 | ||||
| Juam | 1010 | 33 | 108.5 | Middle (M) | 36.6 | 22.2 | 10.3 | 6.2 | 78.3 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 6.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.7 |
| Outflow (O) | 38.5 | 22.8 | 8.8 | 6.1 | 70.5 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 8.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.6 | ||||
| Average | 37.6 | 22.5 | 9.6 | 6.1 | 74.4 | 3.7 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 7.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.6 | ||||
Figure 2Gene expression analysis of HSP70 (A), HSP90 (B), SOD (C), CAT (D), and MT (E) in Zacco platypus gills. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. The expression levels of each gene were compared with the expression level in Singal Lake inflow (expression level = 1). Significant differences are indicated with asterisks: * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3Gene expression analysis of HSP70 (A), HSP90 (B), SOD (C), CAT (D), and MT (E) in Zacco platypus liver. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. The expression levels of each gene were compared with the expression level in Singal Lake inflow (expression level = 1). Significant differences are indicated with asterisks: ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4Star plots of IBR values for evaluating multiple gene responses in the gills (A) and liver (B) of Zacco platypus from each sampling site of Singal and Juam lakes.
Figure 5Heatmap of water quality factors at each sampling site in Singal and Juam Lakes. Cell color represents high or low levels of water quality factors. Each group underwent Z-score normalization.