| Literature DB >> 36140762 |
Madison Maertens1, Hailey Silver2, Jayne Dixon Weber3, Hillary Rosselot3, Reymundo Lozano1,3,4.
Abstract
Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-intoxicating chemical in cannabis plants that is being investigated as a candidate for treatment in Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), a leading known cause of inherited intellectual developmental disability. Studies have shown that CBD can reduce symptoms such as anxiety, social avoidance, hyperactivity, aggression, and sleep problems. This is a qualitative study that utilized a voluntary-anonymous survey that consisted of questions regarding demographics, medical information, the form, type, brand, dose, and frequency of CBD use, the rationale for use, the perception of effects, side effects, and costs. The full survey contained a total of 34 questions, including multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and optional free-response questions. This research revealed that there are a wide range of types, brands, and doses of CBD being administered to individuals with FXS by their parents and caregivers. There were many reasons why CBD was chosen, the most common ones being that respondents had heard positive things about CBD from members of the community, the perception that CBD had fewer side effects than other medications, and because respondents felt that CBD was a more natural substance. Most of the parents and caregivers who responded agreed that CBD improved some of the symptoms of FXS and made a positive difference overall. CBD has the therapeutic potential to help relieve some FXS symptoms. Future research is necessary to understand the benefits of CBD in FXS.Entities:
Keywords: CBD; CBD treatment; Cannabidiol; Fragile X Syndrome; caregiver perspectives
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36140762 PMCID: PMC9498854 DOI: 10.3390/genes13091594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.141
Demographic characteristics of individuals with FXS (n = 25).
| Demographic Characteristics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | N | % | Variable | Median | Range (Min, Max) |
| Ethnicity | Age | 20 | (5.57) | ||
| White | 20 | 80% | |||
| Latino/Hispanic | 1 | 4% | |||
| Asian | 2 | 8% | |||
| White/Asian | 1 | 4% | |||
| White/African American | 1 | 4% | |||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 22 | 88% | |||
| Female | 3 | 12% | |||
Severity of signs and symptoms experienced by individuals with FXS who were using CBD (n = 15).
| Sign/Symptom | Severity | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very Mild | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Present | |
| IDD | 1 (7%) | 0 (0%) | 10 (67%) | 4 (27%) | 15 (100%) |
| Anxiety | 0 (0%) | 2 (13%) | 12 (80%) | 1 (7%) | 15 (100%) |
| Seizures | 0 (0%) | 1 (7%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (13%) | 3 (20%) |
| Hypersensitivity | 4 (27%) | 4 (27%) | 6 (40%) | 1 (7%) | 15 (100%) |
| Hyperactivity | 4 (27%) | 4 (27%) | 3 (20%) | 1 (7%) | 12 (80%) |
| Attention problems | 0 (0%) | 1 (7%) | 11 (73%) | 3 (20%) | 15 (100%) |
| ASD | 3 (20%) | 2 (13%) | 3 (20%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (53%) |
| Irritability | 0 (0%) | 4 (27%) | 9 (60%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (87%) |
| Aggression | 6 (40%) | 2 (13%) | 4 (27%) | 0 (0%) | 12 (80%) |
| Self-injury | 5 (33%) | 4 (27%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (60%) |
| Sleep problems | 4 (27%) | 2 (13%) | 1 (7%) | 2 (13%) | 9 (60%) |
Intellectual Developmental Disability (IDD); Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
Daily doses of CBD (mg/day) and ages of individuals with FXS (n = 10).
| Dose Given | Age |
|---|---|
| 10 mg/day | 19 |
| 10 mg/day | 16 |
| 10 mg/day | 15 |
| 14 mg/day | 7 |
| 16 mg/day | 46 |
| 25–50 mg/day | 32 |
| 30 mg/day | 34 |
| 100 mg/day | 41 |
| 240 mg/day | 10 |
| 275 mg/day | 14 |
The daily dose of CBD was only available for 10 of 15 individuals.
Figure 1Changes seen with the use of CBD. Footnote: Intellectual Developmental Disability (IDD); Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
Figure 2Changes in behaviors with the use of CBD. Footnote: Intellectual Developmental Disability (IDD); Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
Overall improvement from CBD of symptoms and how caregivers would feel if they had to stop CBD use.
| Total (n) | % | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Very much improved | 3 | 20% |
| Much improved | 7 | 47% |
| Minimally improved | 3 | 20% |
| Neutral | 2 | 13% |
| Minimally worse | 0 | 0% |
| Much worse | 0 | 0% |
| Very much worse | 0 | 0% |
|
| ||
| Not disappointed at all | 2 | 13% |
| Slightly disappointed | 2 | 13% |
| Moderately disappointed | 2 | 13% |
| Very disappointed | 6 | 40% |
| Extremely disappointed | 3 | 20% |