| Literature DB >> 36139349 |
Linaloe Manzano-Pech1, Verónica Guarner-Lans2, María Elena Soto3, Eulises Díaz-Díaz4, Sara Caballero-Chacón5, Roberto Díaz-Torres6, Félix Leao Rodríguez-Fierros7, Israel Pérez-Torres1.
Abstract
Hibiscus sabdariffa L. (HSL) has high amounts of antioxidants and many beneficial effects in several pathologies. However, few studies describe the possible harmful effects of high concentrations of HSL. Here we evaluate the effect of excessive and chronic consumption of infusions with different percentages of HSL on some oxidative stress markers in serum, and the possible association with inflammation and increased systolic blood pressure (SBP), in healthy rats. A total of 32 male Wistar rats were used to form 4 groups with 8 animals each. Group 1 control (drinking tap water), group 2, 3 and 4, drinking water supplemented with 15, 30 and 60 g/L of HSL calyxes respectively. SBP was evaluated and determinations in serum of the NO3-/NO2- ratio, glutathione (GSH), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), selenium (Se), TNF-α, IL-1α/IL-1F1, IL-1β, IL-10, extracellular superoxide dismutase (EcSOD), thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activities, were evaluated. The SBP (p = 0.01), GPx activity, GSH, TAC, Se, TNF-α and EcSOD activities (p ≤ 0.001) and IL-1α/IL-1F1, IL-1β, TrxR and NO3-/NO2- (p ≤ 0.05), were increased but IL-10 (p < 0.001) was decreased in rats that consumed the 3 and 6% HSL infusions. The excessive and chronic consumption of HSL may increase the TAC that could lead to a proinflammatory state which is associated with hypertension.Entities:
Keywords: Hibiscus sabdariffa L.; hypertension; oxidative stress; proinflammatory interleukins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36139349 PMCID: PMC9497088 DOI: 10.3390/cells11182774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 7.666
Corresponds equivalence of the antioxidants and the water that consumed per rat/day.
| Daily Antioxidant Intake | HSL (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 1.5 | 3 | 6 | |
| Water consumption (mL/day) | 50.57 ± 1.90 | 48.20 ± 1.31 | 46.38 ± 0.47 | 47.00 ± 0.75 |
| Cyaniding-3-glucoside (mg/day) | 0 | 5.09 ± 2 × 10−2 | 25.57 ± 4 × 10−3 | 28.38 ± 7 × 10−3 |
| Quercetin (mg/day) | 0 | 0.01 ± 1 × 10−5 | 0.04 ± 9 × 10 −6 | 0.05 ± 7 × 10−6 |
| Polyphenols (mM/day) | 0 | 0.01 ± 2 × 10−5 | 0.03 ± 4 × 10−6 | 0.03 ± 2 × 10−5 |
| Vitamin C (mg/day) | 0 | 0.01 ± 1 × 10−5 | 0.03 ± 9 × 10−6 | 0.04 ± 7 × 10−6 |
Figure 1Systolic blood pressure in experimental rats (n = 8). The data are presented as median and maximum and minimum ranges (interquartile range 25th percentile, 75th percentile by the type distribution. Additionally, the mean and standard error values of the systolic blood pressure per group expressed in mmHg were as follows: Group 1 = 127.8 ± 5.6, Group 2 = 133.7 ± 2.9, Group 3 = 140.1 ± 3.6, and Group 4 = 145.5 ± 2.6. Abbreviations HSL = Hibiscus Sabdarrifa L.
Oxidative stress markers in serum in the rats of the experimental groups.
| Variables | Control | HSL (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 3 | 6 | ||
| TAC (nM) | 854.73 ± 41.60 | 1077.97 ± 59.95 | 1248.48 ± 109.10 * | 1405.52 ± 175.92 ** |
| GSH (µM) | 1.15 ± 0.02 | 1.31 ± 0.02 * | 1.38 ± 0.03 ** | 1.42 ± 0.01 ** |
| Se (nM/mL) | 0.003 ± 0.0002 | 0.004 ± 0.0006 | 0.004 ± 0.0003 * | 0.005 ± 0.0003 ** |
| GPx (µmol NADPH oxidized/min) | 3.05 ± 0.09 | 3.12 ± 0.08 | 3.29 ± 0.05 | 3.56 ± 0.12 ** |
| TrxR (µmol TNB/min) | 0.003 ± 0.0006 | 0.004 ± 0.0005 | 0.004 ± 0.0004 | 0.007 ± 0.001 * |
| NO3−/NO2− (nM) | 2.94 ± 0.25 | 3.03 ± 0.24 | 3.69 ± 0.15 * | 4.18 ± 0.14 ** |
* C vs. HSL at 3% or at 6% p ≤ 0.05, ** C vs. HSL at 6% p < 0.001. Abbreviations: TAC = Total antioxidant capacity, GSH = Glutathione reduced, Se = Selenium, GPx = Glutathione peroxidase, TrxR = Thioredoxin reductase, NO3−/NO2− = Nitrate/Nitrite. NADPH = Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, TNB = Thiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid. (n = 8 animals per group). Values are expressed as the mean ± SE.
Proinflammatory markers in serum in the rats of the experimental groups.
| Variables | Control | HSL (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 3 | 6 | ||
| TNF-α | 143.13 ± 22.13 | 325.70 ± 46.14 ** | 297.68 ± 34.85 ** | 265.81 ± 30.05 ** |
| IL-10 | 20.27 ± 0.83 | 19.48 ± 0.84 | 18.12 ± 0.61 * | 16.78 ± 0.8 ** |
| IL-1α/IL-1F1 | 3858.17 ± 369.28 | 3862.54 ± 383.19 | 3771.7 ± 289.50 | 4903.54 ± 319.82 * |
| IL-1β | 1007.31 ± 14.92 | 977.52 ± 22.48 | 1024.60 ± 16.45 | 1066.89 ± 14.38 * |
* C vs. HSL at 3% and 6% p ≤ 0.05. ** C vs. HSL at 1.5%, 3% and 6% p < 0.001. Abbreviations: TNF-α = Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, IL = Interleukins (n = 8 animals per group). Values are expressed as the mean ± SE.
Figure 2Linear regression between SBP vs. TAC panel (A) and IL-10 vs. TAC panel (B) Constant Variance Test Spearman Rank Correlation.
Figure 3Native gel representative, HSL infusion at 3 and 6% increased the EcSOD activity in serum. In a native gel the TEMED and riboflavin in presence the UV light and oxygen of the medium; produce O2−, the NBT and EcSOD compete for them, where EcSOD is present; the gel remains transparent, whereas reduced the NBT turns to purple-blue.
Figure 4Representative photomicrographs of the histological segments of the aortas of the experimental rats receiving the different percentages of the HSL infusion. The values are expressed as the mean ± SE and units in arbitrary pixels. * C vs. HSL at 6% p = 0.04. The histological sections were made and stained by Jones methylamine silver stain technique at 16x. Abbreviations: (A) = Control, (B) = HSL at 1.5 %, (C) = HSL at 3 %, (D) = HSL at 6%, E = Endothelium, A = Adventitia, EF = Elastic fibers.