Literature DB >> 3613915

Comparing the areas under more than two independent ROC curves.

D K McClish.   

Abstract

For a diagnostic test, the area under the associated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is considered a measure of the efficacy of the test. Statistical methodology for the comparison of the areas under more than two independent ROC curves is developed. The jackknife is used to devise an F test using the pseudovalues as data. A Studentized range (SR) test is also considered using the original area estimates. A Monte Carlo study is performed to evaluate the significance level and power of the two test statistics. Both statistics conform well to the 0.10, 0.05, and 0.01 significance levels when the sampling design is balanced between cases with and without the disease. Power is also comparable. For unbalanced designs, the SR test on the original area estimates is very conservative while the F test on pseudovalues performs well. The F test is recommended as the method of choice for comparing the areas, although for balanced designs the SR test, with its computational simplicity, may be preferred.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3613915     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8700700305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  8 in total

1.  A Unified Approach to Nonparametric Comparison of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves for Longitudinal and Clustered Data.

Authors:  Gang Li; Kefei Zhou
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Validity of the five-item WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5) in an elderly population.

Authors:  M Bonsignore; K Barkow; F Jessen; R Heun
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Bone mineral density by DXA and HR pQCT can discriminate fracture status in men and women with stages 3 to 5 chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  S A Jamal; A M Cheung; S L West; C E Lok
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Compare diagnostic tests using transformation-invariant smoothed ROC curves().

Authors:  Liansheng Tang; Pang Du; Chengqing Wu
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 1.111

5.  A Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury in Adult Patients With Minimal Change Disease.

Authors:  Chen Yang; Chen Yang; Shu-Peng Lin; Pu Chen; Jie Wu; Jin-Ling Meng; Shuang Liang; Feng-Ge Zhu; Yong Wang; Zhe Feng; Xiang-Mei Chen; Guang-Yan Cai
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-24

6.  Evaluations and comparisons of treatment effects based on best combinations of biomarkers with applications to biomedical studies.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Xiwei Chen; Jihnhee Yu
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  Association of Sickle Cell Trait With Hemoglobin A1c in African Americans.

Authors:  Mary E Lacy; Gregory A Wellenius; Anne E Sumner; Adolfo Correa; Mercedes R Carnethon; Robert I Liem; James G Wilson; David B Sacks; David R Jacobs; April P Carson; Xi Luo; Annie Gjelsvik; Alexander P Reiner; Rakhi P Naik; Simin Liu; Solomon K Musani; Charles B Eaton; Wen-Chih Wu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 157.335

8.  External validation and insights about the calibration of the return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest (RACA) score.

Authors:  Lorenzo Gamberini; Chiara Natalia Tartivita; Martina Guarnera; Davide Allegri; Simone Baroncini; Tommaso Scquizzato; Marco Tartaglione; Carlo Alberto Mazzoli; Valentina Chiarini; Cosimo Picoco; Carlo Coniglio; Federico Semeraro; Giovanni Gordini
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2022-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.