BACKGROUND: Depression has a high prevalence in the elderly population; however it often remains undetected. The WHO 5-item Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is a short screening instrument for the detection of depression in the general population, which has not yet been evaluated. The goals of the present study were: 1) to assess the internal and external validity of WHO-5 and 2) to compare the two recent versions of WHO-5. STUDY POPULATION AND METHODS: 367 subjects above 50 years of age were examined with the WHO-5. ICD-10 diagnoses were made using a structured interview (CIDI). The internal validity of the well-being index was evaluated by calculating Loevinger's and Mokken's homogeneity coefficients. External validity for detection of depression was evaluated by ROC analysis. RESULTS: The scale was sufficiently homogeneous (Loevinger's coefficient: version 1 = 0.38, version 2 = 0.47; Mokken coefficient > 0.3 in nearly all items). ROC analysis showed that both versions adequately detected depression. Version 1 additionally detected anxiety disorders, version 2 being more specific for detection of depression. CONCLUSION: The WHO-5 showed a good internal and external validity. The second version is a stronger scale and was more specific for the detection of depression. The WHO-5 is an useful instrument for identifying elderly subjects with depression.
BACKGROUND:Depression has a high prevalence in the elderly population; however it often remains undetected. The WHO 5-item Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is a short screening instrument for the detection of depression in the general population, which has not yet been evaluated. The goals of the present study were: 1) to assess the internal and external validity of WHO-5 and 2) to compare the two recent versions of WHO-5. STUDY POPULATION AND METHODS: 367 subjects above 50 years of age were examined with the WHO-5. ICD-10 diagnoses were made using a structured interview (CIDI). The internal validity of the well-being index was evaluated by calculating Loevinger's and Mokken's homogeneity coefficients. External validity for detection of depression was evaluated by ROC analysis. RESULTS: The scale was sufficiently homogeneous (Loevinger's coefficient: version 1 = 0.38, version 2 = 0.47; Mokken coefficient > 0.3 in nearly all items). ROC analysis showed that both versions adequately detected depression. Version 1 additionally detected anxiety disorders, version 2 being more specific for detection of depression. CONCLUSION: The WHO-5 showed a good internal and external validity. The second version is a stronger scale and was more specific for the detection of depression. The WHO-5 is an useful instrument for identifying elderly subjects with depression.
Authors: J Ormel; W Van Den Brink; M W Koeter; R Giel; K Van Der Meer; G Van De Willige; F W Wilmink Journal: Psychol Med Date: 1990-11 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: T Sunderland; I S Alterman; D Yount; J L Hill; P N Tariot; P A Newhouse; E A Mueller; A M Mellow; R M Cohen Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1988-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: I Rakovac; R J Gfrerer; W Habacher; S Seereiner; P Beck; A Risse; B Bauer; T R Pieber Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2004-07-22 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Elizabeth A Walker; Lynn D Silver; Shadi Chamany; Clyde B Schechter; Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Jeidy Carrasco; Danielle Powell; Diana Berger; Charles E Basch Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Christopher T Richards; Michael A Gisondi; Chih-Hung Chang; D Mark Courtney; Kirsten G Engel; Linda Emanuel; Tammie Quest Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Sanne G Swinnen; Marie-Paule Dain; Ronnie Aronson; Melanie Davies; Hertzel C Gerstein; Andreas F Pfeiffer; Frank J Snoek; J Hans Devries; Joost B Hoekstra; Frits Holleman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 17.152