Literature DB >> 36138299

Attenuating the 'attentional white bear' effect enhances suppressive attention.

Alex Muhl-Richardson1,2, Maria Tortosa-Molina1, Sergio A Recio1, Maximilian G Parker1, Greg J Davis3.   

Abstract

Trying to ignore an object can bias attention towards it - a phenomenon referred to as the 'attentional white bear' (AWB) effect. The mechanisms behind this effect remain unclear. On one hand, the AWB may reflect reactive, 'search and destroy' distractor suppression, which directs attention toward irrelevant objects in order to suppress further attention to them. However, another possibility is that the AWB results from failed proactive distractor suppression - attempting to suppress attention to an irrelevant object from the outset may inadvertently result in an attentional shift towards it. To distinguish these two possibilities, we developed a categorical visual search task that addresses limitations present in prior studies. In five experiments (Ntotal = 96), participants searched displays of naturalistic stimuli cued only with distractor categories (targets were unknown and unpredictable). We observed an AWB and later attenuated it by presenting a pre-search stimulus, likely disrupting guidance from distractor templates in working memory. We conclude that the AWB resulted from a failure of proactive suppression rather than a search and destroy process.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Attentional white bear; Eye movements; Suppression; Visual search

Year:  2022        PMID: 36138299     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02560-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.157


  19 in total

1.  Templates for rejection can specify semantic properties of nontargets in natural scenes.

Authors:  Jennifer L Daffron; Greg Davis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

3.  Taming the White Bear: Initial Costs and Eventual Benefits of Distractor Inhibition.

Authors:  Corbin A Cunningham; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-02-18

Review 4.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

5.  Distinguishing among potential mechanisms of singleton suppression.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09-29

7.  Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.

Authors:  Jason T Arita; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding.

Authors:  Valerie M Beck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Combined Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence for the Suppression of Salient Distractors.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  An analysis of the dependence of saccadic latency on target position and target characteristics in human subjects.

Authors:  J H Darrien; K Herd; L J Starling; J R Rosenberg; J D Morrison
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.