Literature DB >> 36138042

Injectable nanoporous microgels generate vascularized constructs and support bone regeneration in critical-sized defects.

Matthew D Patrick1, Jeremy F Keys1, Harshini Suresh Kumar1, Ramkumar T Annamalai2.   

Abstract

Large and aberrant bone fractures require ossification and concomitant vascularization for proper healing. Evidence indicates that osteogenesis and vessel growth are coupled in bone fractures. Although the synergistic role of endothelial cells has been recognized, vascularizing large bone grafts remains a challenge and has apprehended the clinical translation of engineered bone constructs. Here, we describe a facile method to fabricate vascularized constructs using chitosan and gelatin-based microgels that promote osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) while supporting endothelial sprouting and network formation. The microgels are enzymatically degradable and had a high hydration rate with a volume swelling ratio of ~ 493% and a polymer density of ~ 431 mg/cm3, which is comparable to that of native skeletal tissues. AFM indentation of the surface showed an average Young's modulus of 189 kPa, falling in a range that is conducive to both osteogenesis and vasculogenesis. The osteogenic microgel containing chitosan, gelatin, and hydroxyapatite, mimicking the bone matrix, supported robust attachment, proliferation, and differentiation of MSC. On the other hand, the vasculogenic microgels containing only gelatin, enriched endothelial phenotype and enabled vascular networks formation when embedded in 3D matrices. Combining the two types of microgels created a hybrid construct that sustained the functions of both osteogenic and vasculogenic microgels and enhanced one another. Using a murine model, we also show that the osteogenic microgels regenerate bone in a critical-sized defect with > 95% defect closure by week 12. These multifunctional microgels can be administered minimally invasively and can conformally fill large bone defects. This work lays the foundation to establish principles of designing multiphasic scaffolds with tissue-specific biophysical and biochemical properties for regenerating vascularized and interfacial tissues.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36138042     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19968-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  42 in total

Review 1.  Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology.

Authors:  Ali Khademhosseini; Robert Langer; Jeffrey Borenstein; Joseph P Vacanti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Risk factors contributing to fracture non-unions.

Authors:  G M Calori; W Albisetti; A Agus; S Iori; L Tagliabue
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  What should be the characteristics of the ideal bone graft substitute? Combining scaffolds with growth factors and/or stem cells.

Authors:  Patricia Janicki; Gerhard Schmidmaier
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 4.  Complications following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rozalia Dimitriou; George I Mataliotakis; Antonios G Angoules; Nikolaos K Kanakaris; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Injectable scaffolds: Preparation and application in dental and craniofacial regeneration.

Authors:  Bei Chang; Neelam Ahuja; Chi Ma; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng R Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 36.214

Review 6.  Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing.

Authors:  Timothy T Roberts; Andrew J Rosenbaum
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Clinical application of human mesenchymal stromal cells for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Anindita Chatterjea; Gert Meijer; Clemens van Blitterswijk; Jan de Boer
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 8.  Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions - A 21st Century Perspective.

Authors:  Jan Henkel; Maria A Woodruff; Devakara R Epari; Roland Steck; Vaida Glatt; Ian C Dickinson; Peter F M Choong; Michael A Schuetz; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 9.  Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Mei Liu; Xin Zeng; Chao Ma; Huan Yi; Zeeshan Ali; Xianbo Mou; Song Li; Yan Deng; Nongyue He
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 10.  Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions.

Authors:  Ahmad Oryan; Soodeh Alidadi; Ali Moshiri; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.