| Literature DB >> 36137115 |
Inoue Mizuki1, Yoshiharu Sango1, Kiyoshi Ishida2, Yuko T Hanba3, Masaaki Chiwa4, Yoshitoshi Uehara5, Atsushi Kume6.
Abstract
Plants respond to environmental stressors, such as an oligotrophic environments, by altering the morphological and physiological functions of their leaves. Sex affects these functions because of the asymmetric cost of reproduction in dioecious plants. We compared the leaf mass per leaf area (LMA), ratio of intercellular air space in leaf mesophyll tissue (mesophyll porosity), palisade thickness, and carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) of leaves of the dioecious shrub Myrica gale based on sex and gradients of soil water chemistry across habitats in the field. The PCA showed that the first three principal components accounted for 84.5% of the variation. PC1 to PC3 were associated with the origin of soil water, nitrogen status of habitats, and sea-salt contributions, respectively. LMA varied from 5.22 to 7.13 μg/cm2, and it was positively related to PC2 and negatively related to PC3, but not to PC1 or sex, suggesting that LMA was low under poor nitrogen conditions and varied with salinity. Mesophyll porosity values were over 50% for all habitats. Mesophyll porosity was positively affected by PC3 and smaller in females than in males. This suggests that M. gale exhibits differences in mesophyll anatomy according to sex. Palisade thickness ranged from 0.466 to 0.559 mm/mm. The leaves of females had thinner palisade layers per mesophyll layer than those of males; however, the habitat did not affect the thickness of the palisade layer per mesophyll layer. The δ13C values of leaves varied from -32.14 to -30.51 ‰. We found that δ13C values were positively related to PC2 but not to PC1, PC3, and sex. Under poor nitrogen conditions, the δ13C of M. gale leaves decreased, suggesting that nutrient deficiency would decrease more under the long-term averaged ratio of photosynthesis than stomatal conductance, leading to low water use efficiency.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36137115 PMCID: PMC9499279 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1Study sites of Myrica gale populations.
Abbreviations of the sites are shown in parentheses. Maps were created using Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com.
Summary of chemical analyses of soil water in eight habitats of Myrica gale.
| Habitat | Oike | Po | Ochiishi | Bekanbeushi | Oikanamai | Kimonto | Bentennuma | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center | Edge | |||||||
| Ab. | Oike | Po | Ochi | Bek_C | Bek_E | Oikan | Kimon | Benten |
| pH | 6.39 (−0.05) | 5.95 (−0.06) | 6.09 (−0.02) | 5.67 (−0.09) | 6.43 (−0.02) | 6.36 (−0.03) | 6.38 (−0.07) | 6.29 (−0.05) |
| Cl– | 285.21 (−66.15) | 171.99 (−31.57) | 390.12 (−33.14) | 72.47 (−9.33) | 107.42 (−3.44) | 170.04 (−8.54) | 79.73 (−2.25) | 204.96 (−16.66) |
| NO3– | 13.34 (−8.46) | 0.08 (−0.08) | 0 (0) | 0.06 (−0.06) | 0 (0) | 0.58 (−0.2) | 0.09 (−0.09) | 8.77 (−3.33) |
| SO42– | 111.9 (−50.9) | 14.99 (−3.2) | 31.1 (−14.67) | 3.14 (−0.78) | 1.53 (−0.51) | 3.87 (−0.79) | 12.74 (−4.45) | 72.38 (−12.85) |
| Na+ | 413.88 (−107.39) | 251.12 (−31.13) | 488.39 (−41.15) | 142.16 (−10.97) | 267.57 (−8.76) | 284.49 (−12.11) | 166.74 (−12.16) | 386.86 (−28.16) |
| NH4+ | 26.58 (−4.81) | 3.67 (−3.67) | 2.8 (−1.48) | 17.46 (−1.86) | 16.89 (−4.17) | 20.1 (−4.68) | 40.26 (−2.65) | 26.48 (−9.07) |
| K+ | 76.92 (−15.85) | 46.24 (−11.64) | 46.76 (−7.34) | 33.44 (−7.65) | 20.99 (−3.89) | 42.06 (−5.56) | 30.68 (−5.1) | 44.9 (−13.81) |
| Mg2+ | 103.69 (−24.99) | 49.98 (−2.8) | 64.9 (−8.33) | 30.96 (−2.4) | 27.45 (−5.05) | 43.77 (−3.35) | 26.2 (−5.67) | 38.17 (−5.5) |
| Ca2+ | 221.03 (−55.27) | 57.7 (−4.65) | 73.47 (−2.74) | 64.5 (−8.12) | 46.77 (−9.69) | 74.36 (−10.5) | 38.42 (−7.98) | 70.98 (−4.16) |
| Si | 223.33 (−56.56) | 351.93 (−48.63) | 215.87 (−66.78) | 346.46 (−93.05) | 300.44 (−57.11) | 241.36 (−18.32) | 349.37 (−20.17) | 599.25 (−40.22) |
| DON | 108.34 (−8.86) | 178.62 (−20.74) | 173.27 (−14.82) | 169.16 (−18.52) | 146.57 (−16.07) | 140.39 (−7.83) | 82.84 (−13.28) | 75.25 (−3.2) |
| DTN | 2.08 (−0.25) | 2.55 (−0.25) | 2.47 (−0.21) | 2.61 (−0.26) | 2.29 (−0.25) | 2.26 (−0.11) | 1.72 (−0.2) | 1.55 (−0.14) |
| DTP | 20.22 (−8.21) | 98.33 (−20.91) | 41.04 (−5.98) | 32.26 (−6.05) | 93.68 (−38.14) | 22.97 (−4.36) | 31.23 (−10.02) | 14.19 (−1.82) |
Ab.: Abbreviation of habitat name.
Means and SE are shown in the upper and under lines in parentheses, respectively.
The units of measurement for Cl–, NO3–, SO42–, Na+, NH4+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Si, and DON were μmol/L.
The units of measurement for DTN and DTP were μmg/L and μg/L, respectively.
Summary of habitat characteristics based on concentrations of soil water chemistry using PCA.
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD | 2.44 | 1.97 | 1.07 | 1.05 | 0.84 | 0.36 | 0.27 |
| PV | 0.46 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| CP | 0.46 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.00 |
| Element | |||||||
| pH | –0.18 | –0.22 | 0.29 |
| –0.17 | 0.22 |
|
| Cl– | –0.26 | 0.29 |
| 0.01 | 0.29 | –0.26 | 0.22 |
| NO3– |
| –0.08 | –0.11 | 0.17 | –0.28 |
| 0.00 |
| SO42– |
| –0.01 | –0.01 | 0.18 | –0.20 | 0.01 |
|
| Na+ | –0.29 | 0.20 |
| –0.01 | 0.14 | 0.26 | 0.13 |
| NH4+ | –0.11 |
| –0.30 | –0.20 | 0.11 | –0.16 |
|
| K+ |
| 0.18 | –0.19 | 0.12 | –0.06 |
|
|
| Mg2+ |
| 0.27 | –0.15 | –0.08 | –0.08 | –0.27 | 0.03 |
| Ca2+ |
| 0.13 |
| –0.07 | –0.16 |
| 0.07 |
| DTN | 0.19 |
| –0.24 | 0.02 | –0.02 |
| –0.01 |
| DON | 0.21 |
| –0.06 | 0.05 | –0.01 | 0.20 | –0.12 |
| DTP | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.19 | –0.19 |
| –0.29 | 0.26 |
| Si | 0.01 |
| 0.29 |
| –0.26 | 0.06 | –0.24 |
Standard deviation (SD), proportion of variance (PV), cumulative proportion (CP) of PCA, and rotated component matrix (elements).
Bold characters:| rotated component | > 0.30
Fig 2Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of eight Myrica gale var. tomentosa populations.
Red arrows indicate the parameters used as variables of soil water chemistry. Black characters indicate the abbreviation of populations in Table 1; Oike: Oike, Po: Po, Ochi: Ochiishi, Bek_C: Bekanbeushi_Center, Bek_E: Bekanabeushi_Edge, Oikan: Oikanamai, Kimon: Kimonto, Benten: Bentennnuma.
Leaf characteristics.
| LMA | P/M | Porosity | δ13C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (μg/cm2) | (mm/mm) | (%) | (‰) | |
| Oike | 0.466 (0.013) | 55.5 (1.2) | -31.37 (0.35) | |
| Po | 6.35 (0.39) | 0.558 (0.018) | 81.4 (1.5) | -31.03 (0.09) |
| Ochiishi | 7.13 (0.41) | 0.558 (0.016) | 78.7 (1.7) | -30.51 (0.22) |
| Bekanbeushi_center | 7.13 (0.55) | 0.537 (0.009) | 72.0 (1.9) | -30.69 (0.20) |
| Bekanbeushi_edge | 5.22 (0.27) | 0.521 (0.197) | 71.1 (2.8) | -30.70 (0.24) |
| Oikanamai | 5.86 (0.64) | 0.524 (0.018) | 64.6 (2.2) | -32.14 (0.27) |
| Kimonto | 5.40 (0.41) | 0.559 (0.127) | 71.9 (2.6) | -31.82 (0.33) |
| Bentennuma | 6.87 (0.33) | 0.543 (0.013) | 79.8 (1.5) | -31.67 (0.51) |
LMA: leaf mass per leaf area
P/M: thickness of the palisade layer per mesophyll layer
Porosity: mesophyll porosity
Values represent means with standard error in parentheses
Standard partial regression coefficient for LMA and AIC based on the GLMs.
| Explanatory variable | Full model | Best model |
|---|---|---|
| PC1 | –0.236 | |
| PC2 | 0.394 | 0.318 |
| PC3 | –0.510 | –0.343 |
| male vs. female | 0.003 | |
| AIC | 6.9 | 4.6 |
Fig 3Transections of leaves of representative Myrica gale.
Fig 4Relationship between thickness of palisade layer per mesophyll layer and sexes (a), mesophyll porosity, PC3, and sexes (b), and δ13C values and PC2 (c). The line and shading indicate the mean and the 95% confidence intervals of GLMs. Red circles and lines: females, blue triangles, lines: males.
Fig 5Schematic overview of the relationship between leaf characteristics and habitat environmental conditions.