Literature DB >> 36136328

Association of Intraoperative Frozen Section Controls With Improved Margin Assessment During Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Alice C Yu1, David D Afework2, Jeffrey D Goldstein2, Elliot Abemayor1, Abie H Mendelsohn1.   

Abstract

Importance: Intraoperative margin assessment is an important technique for ensuring complete tumor resection in malignant cancers. However, in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal carcinomas, tissue artifact may provide pathologic uncertainty. Objective: To assess the benefit of providing frozen section control samples ("positive tumor biopsies") for use during intraoperative margin assessment for patients undergoing TORS for human papillomavirus (HPV)-16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, patients receiving curative-intent TORS for biopsy-proven HPV-16-positive OPSCC performed by a single attending surgeon (A.H.M.) at Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center from 2017 to 2021 were included in a retrospective data analysis. Exclusion criteria included HPV-negative status, participation in clinical trials, and tumors of unknown primary origin. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survival outcomes investigated included overall and disease-free survival. Adverse pathologic outcomes measured included occurrence of nondiagnostic margins and margin reversal from frozen to fixed pathology.
Results: Of the 170 patients included (mean [SD] age, 61.8 [9.9] years; 140 [82%] male), 50% of patients (n = 85) received a frozen section control. Use of a frozen section control was associated with statistically significantly improved sensitivity of intraoperative margin assessment, from 82.8% to 88.9% (difference, 6.1%; 95% CI, 3.9%-8.3%). Eleven percent (n = 18) of all tumors evaluated exhibited at least 1 nondiagnostic intraoperative margin, and 11% (n = 18) experienced margin reversal from frozen to fixed pathology. In patients with nondiagnostic margins, use of frozen section controls was associated with statistically significantly reduced time spent in the operating room (Cohen d, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.12-2.14). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, frozen intraoperative margins assessed during TORS resections of HPV-16-positive OPSCC were diagnostically challenging. Adverse pathologic outcomes, such as margin status reversal from positive on frozen pathology to negative on formal analysis, were common. Providing intraoperative frozen section control biopsies may offer clarity in cases with nondiagnostic margins, reducing the need for additional sampling and time spent in the operating room.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36136328      PMCID: PMC9501795          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.2840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   8.961


  30 in total

Review 1.  Pitfalls in determining head and neck surgical margins.

Authors:  Y Etan Weinstock; Ibrahim Alava; Eric J Dierks
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Transoral robotic surgery for management of cervical unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma: Updates on efficacy, surgical technique and margin status.

Authors:  Mathew Geltzeiler; Sean Doerfler; Meghan Turner; William Greer Albergotti; Mark Kubik; Seungwon Kim; Robert Ferris; Umamaheswar Duvvuri
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Frozen Section Evaluation of Margin Status in Primary Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck: A Correlation Study of Frozen Section and Final Diagnoses.

Authors:  Eleanor M Layfield; Robert L Schmidt; Magda Esebua; Lester J Layfield
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2017-08-23

4.  Incidence and Demographic Burden of HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancers in the United States.

Authors:  Brandon A Mahal; Paul J Catalano; Robert I Haddad; Glenn J Hanna; Jason I Kass; Jonathan D Schoenfeld; Roy B Tishler; Danielle N Margalit
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck tumors: learning curve.

Authors:  Georges Lawson; Nayla Matar; Marc Remacle; Jacques Jamart; Vincent Bachy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Accuracy, utility, and cost of frozen section margins in head and neck cancer surgery.

Authors:  L J DiNardo; J Lin; L S Karageorge; C N Powers
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Positive margin rates and predictors in transoral robotic surgery after federal approval: A national quality study.

Authors:  Jonathan Hanna; Elliot Morse; Philip R Brauer; Benjamin Judson; Saral Mehra
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  A prospective study of intraoperative assessment of mucosal squamous cell carcinoma margins in the head and neck.

Authors:  Fiona A E Smithers; Georg Haymerle; Carsten E Palme; Tsu-Hui Hubert Low; Catriona Froggatt; Ruta Gupta; Jonathan R Clark
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 9.  Robotic compared with open operations for cancers of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Liu; Y Wang; C Wu; X Sun; L Li; C Li; Q Chen; E Luo
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 10.  Performance of Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cancer Surgery: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Elisa M Barroso; Yassine Aaboubout; Lisette C van der Sar; Hetty Mast; Aniel Sewnaik; Jose A Hardillo; Ivo Ten Hove; Maria R Nunes Soares; Lars Ottevanger; Tom C Bakker Schut; Gerwin J Puppels; Senada Koljenović
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.