Jonathan Hanna1, Elliot Morse1, Philip R Brauer1, Benjamin Judson2, Saral Mehra2. 1. Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Purpose of the study is to assess nationwide margin performance in oropharynx transoral robotic surgery (TORS). METHODS: Retrospective review of the National Cancer Database. RESULTS: Two thousand six hundred sixty-one patients were included. The national positive margin rate (PMR) was 16.9%. High-volume facilities had a lower PMR than low-volume facilities (12.7% vs 21.9%; P < .001). Patients with disease of the tonsil had a lower PMR (15.7%) than base-of-the-tongue (18.2%; P = .14). PMR increased with T classification (T1 = 13.0%, T2 = 17.1%, T3 = 28.2%, T4a = 45.9%, T4b = 58.3%; P < .001). On multivariable regression, factors associated with margin status included only lymph-vascular invasion (1.63[1.13-2.36]; P = .01), high volume (0.57[0.36-0.92]; P = .005), and T classification (as compared to T1, T2: 1.50[1.03-2.18], T3: 3.11[1.77-5.46], T4a: 7.03[2.95-16.75], T4b: 6.72[1.26-35.93]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: National PMR is 16.9%, substantially higher than reported in high-volume TORS centers. There is a linear association between positive margins and T classification, with T3 and T4 PMRs exceeding 28%. High-volume facilities are half as likely to yield positive margins compared to low-volume facilities. There was no association between human papilloma virus status, tumor subsite, or academic facility status and positive margins.
BACKGROUND: Purpose of the study is to assess nationwide margin performance in oropharynx transoral robotic surgery (TORS). METHODS: Retrospective review of the National Cancer Database. RESULTS: Two thousand six hundred sixty-one patients were included. The national positive margin rate (PMR) was 16.9%. High-volume facilities had a lower PMR than low-volume facilities (12.7% vs 21.9%; P < .001). Patients with disease of the tonsil had a lower PMR (15.7%) than base-of-the-tongue (18.2%; P = .14). PMR increased with T classification (T1 = 13.0%, T2 = 17.1%, T3 = 28.2%, T4a = 45.9%, T4b = 58.3%; P < .001). On multivariable regression, factors associated with margin status included only lymph-vascular invasion (1.63[1.13-2.36]; P = .01), high volume (0.57[0.36-0.92]; P = .005), and T classification (as compared to T1, T2: 1.50[1.03-2.18], T3: 3.11[1.77-5.46], T4a: 7.03[2.95-16.75], T4b: 6.72[1.26-35.93]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: National PMR is 16.9%, substantially higher than reported in high-volume TORS centers. There is a linear association between positive margins and T classification, with T3 and T4 PMRs exceeding 28%. High-volume facilities are half as likely to yield positive margins compared to low-volume facilities. There was no association between human papilloma virus status, tumor subsite, or academic facility status and positive margins.
Authors: Alice C Yu; David D Afework; Jeffrey D Goldstein; Elliot Abemayor; Abie H Mendelsohn Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 8.961
Authors: Jamie R Oliver; Michael J Persky; Binhuan Wang; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Neil D Gross; Alec E Vaezi; Luc G T Morris; Babak Givi Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Nicolas S Poupore; Tiffany Chen; Shaun A Nguyen; Cherie-Ann O Nathan; Jason G Newman Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Christian Simon; Avinash Beharry; Vinidh Paleri; Pascaline Dübi; Karma Lambercy; F Christopher Holsinger; Jelena Todic Journal: Head Neck Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 3.821
Authors: Robert P Takes; Gyorgy B Halmos; John A Ridge; Paolo Bossi; Matthias A W Merkx; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alvaro Sanabria; Ludi E Smeele; Antti A Mäkitie; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 5.075