Importance: Monitoring of the corrected QT interval (QTc) for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy is not standardized. Selection of QTc formula may be associated with adverse event grading and chemotherapy delivery. Objective: To describe the association of QTc formula selection with adverse event grading and chemotherapy delivery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective observational cohort study used data from January 2010 to April 2020 and included adult patients seen at the University of North Carolina Cancer Hospital who had an electrocardiogram (ECG) performed. Exposures: Adjusted QTc using the Bazett, Fridericia, and Framingham formulae. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was QTc prolongation using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Consistency between formulae was evaluated. Subsequently, appropriateness of clinical management due to prolonged QTc was assessed for a subset of patients being treated with chemotherapy agents associated with a prolonged QT interval. We hypothesized that use of the Bazett formula would be associated with higher rates of QTc prolongation and inappropriate modifications to chemotherapy. Results: A total of 19 955 ECGs from 6881 adult patients (3055 [44.4%] women, 3826 [55.6%] men; median [IQR] age at first ECG, 60 [47-68] years) were analyzed. The percentage of ECGs with grade 3 QTc prolongation differed by formula (all patients: Framingham, 1.8%; Fridericia, 2.8%; and Bazett, 9.0%; patients receiving QT-prolonging chemotherapy [2340 ECGs]: Framingham, 2.7%; Fridericia, 4.5%; and Bazett, 12.5%). The Bazett formula resulted in a median QTc value 26.4 milliseconds higher than Fridericia and 27.8 milliseconds higher than Framingham. Of the 1786 ECGs classified as grade 3 by Bazett, 1446 (81.0%) were grade 2 or less by either Fridericia or Framingham. A total of 5 of 28 (17.9%) evaluated clinical changes associated with prolonged QTc were deemed inappropriate when using either Fridericia or Framingham formula. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cohort study suggest that the Bazett formula resulted in higher QTc values associated with a 3-fold increase in grade 3 CTCAE toxic effects compared with other common formulae. Use of the Bazett formula likely was associated with inappropriate changes in clinical management. These data support the use of a standard QTc formula (such as Fridericia or Framingham) for QTc correction in oncology.
Importance: Monitoring of the corrected QT interval (QTc) for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy is not standardized. Selection of QTc formula may be associated with adverse event grading and chemotherapy delivery. Objective: To describe the association of QTc formula selection with adverse event grading and chemotherapy delivery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective observational cohort study used data from January 2010 to April 2020 and included adult patients seen at the University of North Carolina Cancer Hospital who had an electrocardiogram (ECG) performed. Exposures: Adjusted QTc using the Bazett, Fridericia, and Framingham formulae. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was QTc prolongation using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Consistency between formulae was evaluated. Subsequently, appropriateness of clinical management due to prolonged QTc was assessed for a subset of patients being treated with chemotherapy agents associated with a prolonged QT interval. We hypothesized that use of the Bazett formula would be associated with higher rates of QTc prolongation and inappropriate modifications to chemotherapy. Results: A total of 19 955 ECGs from 6881 adult patients (3055 [44.4%] women, 3826 [55.6%] men; median [IQR] age at first ECG, 60 [47-68] years) were analyzed. The percentage of ECGs with grade 3 QTc prolongation differed by formula (all patients: Framingham, 1.8%; Fridericia, 2.8%; and Bazett, 9.0%; patients receiving QT-prolonging chemotherapy [2340 ECGs]: Framingham, 2.7%; Fridericia, 4.5%; and Bazett, 12.5%). The Bazett formula resulted in a median QTc value 26.4 milliseconds higher than Fridericia and 27.8 milliseconds higher than Framingham. Of the 1786 ECGs classified as grade 3 by Bazett, 1446 (81.0%) were grade 2 or less by either Fridericia or Framingham. A total of 5 of 28 (17.9%) evaluated clinical changes associated with prolonged QTc were deemed inappropriate when using either Fridericia or Framingham formula. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cohort study suggest that the Bazett formula resulted in higher QTc values associated with a 3-fold increase in grade 3 CTCAE toxic effects compared with other common formulae. Use of the Bazett formula likely was associated with inappropriate changes in clinical management. These data support the use of a standard QTc formula (such as Fridericia or Framingham) for QTc correction in oncology.
Authors: Peter A Noseworthy; Gina M Peloso; Shih-Jen Hwang; Martin G Larson; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Christopher Newton-Cheh Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: A J Moss; P J Schwartz; R S Crampton; D Tzivoni; E H Locati; J MacCluer; W J Hall; L Weitkamp; G M Vincent; A Garson Journal: Circulation Date: 1991-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W Zareba; A J Moss; P J Schwartz; G M Vincent; J L Robinson; S G Priori; J Benhorin; E H Locati; J A Towbin; M T Keating; M H Lehmann; W J Hall Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-10-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jonas B Nielsen; Claus Graff; Peter V Rasmussen; Adrian Pietersen; Bent Lind; Morten S Olesen; Johannes J Struijk; Stig Haunsø; Jesper H Svendsen; Lars Køber; Thomas A Gerds; Anders G Holst Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: J S L Kloth; A Pagani; M C Verboom; A Malovini; C Napolitano; W H J Kruit; S Sleijfer; N Steeghs; A Zambelli; R H J Mathijssen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 7.640