| Literature DB >> 36135978 |
Pasquale Viggiano1, Maria Oliva Grassi1, Mariagrazia Pignataro1, Giacomo Boscia2, Enrico Borrelli3, Teresa Molfetta1, Federica Evangelista4, Giovanni Alessio1, Francesco Boscia1.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate choriocapillaris vascular density changes around macular neovascularization (MNV) before and after anti-vascular endothelium growth factor (VEGF) injections by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36135978 PMCID: PMC9513736 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.9.18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.048
Figure 1.(A) Structural OCT B-scan displays the corresponding CC segmentation. CC analysis was performed by analyzing OCTA en face (slab 30 µm thick starting 31 µm posterior to the RPE – Bruch's membrane complex [red arrow heads]). (B) The 3 × 3 mm en face CC exhibits subfoveal treatment-naïve MNV (highlighted in green). (C) The perilesional dark halo is encircled in yellow and is represented by a low-flow area surrounding the MNV.
Figure 2.Compensated methodology to remove retinal vessel projection artifacts and to adjust for shadowing artifacts. An inverse transformation process is applied to the en face CC structural to improve the speckle noise of the image. Subsequently, a multiplication process between structural en face CC inverted and the en face CC angiogram is performed.
Figure 3.En face CC OCTA images are used to manually delineate the borders of the CNV lesion and the related dark halo. Afterward, 5 progressive 200-µm-wide concentric rings were generated from the edge of the dark halo using the “Distance Map” function in ImageJ, which automatically creates a border that follows the contour of the perilesional halo. Each ring (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) was added to the region of interest (ROI) manager for CC flow analysis. The custom configuration (unique for each patient) consisting of these rings was applied to the CC en face at T2 at the same size and position. Then, the resulting CC images were binarized for quantitative measurement of the FD in each ring using the Phansalkar method.
The clinical Characteristics of Subjects Included in the Analysis
| Eyes ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | MNV Type |
| |
| Age, y | 73.4 ± 6.5 | N/A | |
| Gender, female (%) | 17 (56%) | N/A | |
| T1 | T2 | ||
| MNV area, mm2 | 0.31 ± 0.24 | 0.23 ± 0.19 |
|
| DH area, mm2 | 2.11 ± 1.96 | 1.87 ± 1.34 |
|
| BCVA logMAR | 0.44 ± 0.14 | 0.37 ± 0.18 |
|
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
MNV, macular neovascularization; DH, dark halo; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; T1, before loading anti-VEGF therapy; T2, after loading anti-VEGF therapy; N/A, not applicable; VEGF, vascular endothelium growth factor.
OCT Angiography FD % Data and Comparisons (T1 vs T2)
| CC FD (%) T1 | CC FD (%) T2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 52.48 ± 8.31 | 50.46 ± 8.99 | 0.059 |
|
| 51.37 ± 8.29 | 48.30 ± 8.62 | 0.003 |
|
| 50.304 ± 8.75 | 46.73 ± 8.27 | 0.001 |
|
| 49.22 ± 9.07 | 45.77 ± 8.11 | 0.001 |
|
| 48.28 ± 9.24 | 45.10 ± 8.14 | 0.003 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
FD%, flow deficit percentage; MNV, macular neovascularization; T1, before loading anti-VEGF therapy; T2, after loading anti-VEGF therapy; VEGF, vascular endothelium growth factor.
OCT Angiography FDa Data and Comparisons (T1 vs T2)
| CC FDa T1 | CC FDa T2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 1 (R1) | 111.6 ± 63.9 | 92.4 ± 53.3 | 0.006 |
| Ring 2 (R2) | 84.5 ± 43.1 | 69.9 ± 36.9 | 0.004 |
| Ring 3 (R3) | 72.9 ± 35.9 | 58.1 ± 25.8 | 0.002 |
| Ring 4 (R4) | 65.8 ± 32.3 | 53.4 ± 24.1 | 0.012 |
| Ring 5 (R5) | 60.8 ± 30.1 | 50.4 ± 23.5 | 0.014 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
FDa, flow deficit average area; MNV, macular neovascularization; T1, before loading anti-VEGF therapy; T2, after loading anti-VEGF therapy; VEGF, vascular endothelium growth factor.
OCT Angiography FDn Data and Comparisons (T1 vs T2)
| CC FDn T1 | CC FDn T2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring 1 (R1) | 5333 ± 162.1 | 6925 ± 232.7 | 0.025 |
| Ring 2 (R2) | 8829 ± 223.2 | 11638 ± 347.4 | 0.001 |
| Ring 3 (R3) | 12995 ± 295.1 | 16299 ± 362.1 | <0.001 |
| Ring 4 (R4) | 17872 ± 379.87 | 21726 ± 406.9 | 0.001 |
| Ring 5 (R5) | 23223 ± 455.2 | 27107 ± 437.98 | 0.001 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
FDn, flow deficit number; MNV, macular neovascularization; T1, before loading anti-VEGF therapy; T2, after loading anti-VEGF therapy; VEGF, vascular endothelium growth factor.