| Literature DB >> 36135681 |
Hanh My Tran1,2, Diep Hong Le1, Van-Anh Thi Nguyen1, Tao Xuan Vu3, Nguyen Thi Kim Thanh1, Do Hoang Giang4, Nguyen Tien Dat4, Hai The Pham1, Marc Muller2, Huy Quang Nguyen1,5, Van-Tuan Tran1,5.
Abstract
Medicinal plants play important roles in traditional medicine, and numerous compounds among them have been recognized for their antimicrobial activity. However, little is known about the potential of Vietnamese medicinal plants for antifungal activity. In this study, we examined the antagonistic activity of twelve medicinal plant species collected in Northern Vietnam against Penicillium digitatum, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Candida albicans. The results showed that the antifungal activities of the crude extracts from Mahonia bealei, Ficus semicordata, and Gnetum montanum were clearly detected with the citrus postharvest pathogen P. digitatum. These extracts could fully inhibit the growth of P. digitatum on the agar medium, and on the infected citrus fruits at concentrations of 300-1000 µg/mL. Meanwhile, the other tested fungi were less sensitive to the antagonistic activity of the plant extracts. In particular, we found that the ethanolic extract of M. bealei displayed a broad-spectrum antifungal activity against all four pathogenic fungi. Analysis of this crude extract by enrichment coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography revealed that berberine and palmatine are major metabolites. Additional inspections indicated berberine as the key compound responsible for the antifungal activity of the M. bealei ethanolic extract. Our study provides a better understanding of the potential of Vietnamese medicinal plant resources for combating fungal pathogens. This work also highlights that the citrus pathogen P. digitatum can be employed as a model fungus for screening the antifungal activity of botanicals.Entities:
Keywords: Mahonia bealei; Penicillium digitatum; Vietnamese medicinal plants; antifungal activity; berberine; fungal pathogens
Year: 2022 PMID: 36135681 PMCID: PMC9502062 DOI: 10.3390/jof8090956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Medicinal plants used in this study.
| Plant Species (Family) | Plant Sample Codes | Parts for Extraction | Period of Sample Collection | Location of Sample Collection | Specimen Collection Codes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KT07 | Leaf | December 2017 | Ha Giang | HNU 024106 | |
| KT09 | Stem | October 2017 | Lao Cai | HNU 024779 | |
| KT10 | Leaf, stem | May 2017 | Ha Giang | HNU 024780 | |
| KT11 | Stem | May 2017 | Ha Giang | HNU 024781 | |
| KT12 | Root | May 2017 | Ha Giang | HNU 024782 | |
| KT13 | Leaf | June 2017 | Quang Ninh | HNU 024783 | |
| KT14 | Root | June 2017 | Hoa Binh | HNU 024784 | |
| KT15 | Stem | October 2018 | Ha Giang | HNU 024785 | |
| KT16 | Leaf, stem | July 2018 | Ha Giang | HNU 024786 | |
| KT17 | Leaf | August 2019 | Ha Giang | HNU 024787 | |
| KT18 | Leaf, stem | August 2018 | Tuyen Quang | HNU 024788 | |
| KT20 | Stem | November 2018 | Hoa Binh | HNU 024790 |
Antifungal activity of the plant crude extracts.
| Plant Species | Plant Sample Codes | Water Extract | Ethanolic Extract | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| KT07 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| KT09 | − | − | − | − | +++ | + | +++ | ++ |
|
| KT10 | ++ | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| KT11 | − | − | − | − | ++ | + | + | − |
|
| KT12 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| KT13 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| KT14 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| KT15 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| KT16 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| KT17 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| KT18 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| KT20 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Note: Pd (P. digitatum), Afl (A. flavus), Afu (A. fumigatus), Ca (C. albicans), (−) no activity, (+) mild activity, (++) moderate activity, (+++) strong activity.
Figure 1Evaluating the antifungal efficacy of the three selected crude extracts from M. bealei (KT09) (A), F. semicordata (KT10) (B), and G. montanum (KT11) (C) against P. digitatum using the agar well diffusion method. The plant extracts were prepared at concentrations of 5–100 mg/mL. A 50 µL volume of fungal spore suspension (106 spores/mL) was spread onto a PDA plate, and 6-mm-diameter wells were punched and filled with 50 µL of each extract. DMSO (10%) was used as the negative control (NC). The plates were incubated at 25–30 °C for 3–4 days. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and data are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD).
Figure 2Assays for minimal inhibitory concentrations of the selected crude extracts, including (A) M. bealei (KT09), (B) F. semicordata (KT10), and (C) G. montanum (KT11) against P. digitatum using the microdilution method. The crude extracts were added to the PDA medium to obtain final concentrations of 5–1000 µg/mL. DMSO was used as the negative control. Fungal spores were prepared at concentrations of 104, 105, and 106 spores/mL. Then, 5 µL volumes of the spore suspensions (equal to 50, 500, and 5000 spores) were spotted onto the PDA plates. Plates were incubated at 25 °C for 3 days.
Figure 3Effect of three selected plant extracts against the postharvest pathogen P. digitatum (Pd) on orange fruits. The wounded oranges treated with sterile water were used as negative, mock-infected control (A), and infected but untreated fruits acted as the positive control (B). The wounded fruits were soaked in a solution containing 800 µg/mL of the KT09 ethanolic extract (C), 300 µg/mL of the KT10 water extract (D), or 1000 µg/mL of the KT11 ethanolic extract (E) before infection with P. digitatum spores. Experiments were conducted in triplicate. The treated fruits were incubated in sterile plastic boxes at 25 °C for 2–6 days. Three different fruits (#1, #2, and #3) were used as examples for each extract treatment.
Figure 4Analysis of the major metabolites of the M. bealei ethanolic extract. (A) Absorption peaks of berberine and palmatine were detected at 345 nm by HPLC using the standard compounds and alkaloid enrichment. (B) Evaluation of the antifungal activity of berberine and palmatine purified from the enrichment extract. These compounds were examined for their antagonistic ability against four different fungi using the agar well diffusion method. Purified berberine and palmatine at concentrations of 500–1000 µg/mL were used for the tests. DMSO (10%) was used for the negative control (NC). Plates were incubated at 25–30 °C for 1–3 days.