| Literature DB >> 36135676 |
Yanan Mo1,2,3, Zhen Yang1,2,3, Baocheng Hao1,2,3, Feng Cheng1,2,3,4, Xiangdong Song5, Xiaofei Shang1,2,3, Haoxia Zhao1,2,3, Ruofeng Shang1,2,3, Xuehong Wang1,2,3, Jianping Liang1,2,3, Shengyi Wang1,2,3, Yu Liu1,2,3,5.
Abstract
Swainsonine (SW) is a substance with both animal neurotoxicity and natural anticancer activity produced by the metabolism of endophytic fungus Alternaria section Undifilum oxytropis of locoweed. This paper produced SW by fermentation of the endophytic fungus A. oxytropis of locoweed and obtained the optimal ultrasonic-assisted extraction process of SW by the response surface methodology. Meanwhile, four mutant strains with significant and stable SW-producing properties were screened out after the mutagenesis of A. oxytropis by heavy-ion irradiation. Of these, three were high-yielding stains and one was a low-yielding strain. In addition, through the analysis of metabolomics studies, it was speculated that the different SW production performance of the mutant might be related to the biosynthesis and utilization of L-lysine, L-2-aminoadipate-6-semialdehyde, etc. These results laid the foundation for the expansion of SW production, artificial construction of low-toxic locoweed and clarification of the SW biosynthesis pathway in A. oxytropis.Entities:
Keywords: Alternaria section Undifilum oxytropis; biosynthesis pathway; heavy-ion irradiation; metabonomics; swainsonine
Year: 2022 PMID: 36135676 PMCID: PMC9505577 DOI: 10.3390/jof8090951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Test factors and levels.
| Level | Factors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A) Extraction Time | (B) Extraction Temperature (℃) | (C) formic Acid Concentration (%) | (D) Material-to-Liquid Ratio (g/mL) | |
| 1 | 120 | 50 | 2 | 1: 30 |
| 0 | 90 | 40 | 1 | 1: 25 |
| −1 | 60 | 30 | 0 | 1: 20 |
Figure 1The standard curve of SW.
Repetitive experiment results.
| The Sample Weight (g) | Content of SW (μg/g) | SW Mean Concentration (μg/g) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.201 | 87.930 | 88.024 | 2.12 |
| 0.203 | 89.281 | ||
| 0.205 | 85.259 | ||
| 0.210 | 86.391 | ||
| 0.206 | 90.049 | ||
| 0.207 | 89.237 |
Recovery test results.
| The Sample Weight (g) | SW Content in the Sample (μg) | The Amount of SW Added (μg) | Estimated Value (μg) | Recovery Rate (%) | Average (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.203 | 17.85 | 20 | 36.926 | 95.37 | 94.71 | 2.82 |
| 0.210 | 18.46 | 20 | 37.370 | 94.51 | ||
| 0.207 | 18.20 | 20 | 36.230 | 90.13 | ||
| 0.200 | 17.59 | 20 | 37.056 | 97.34 | ||
| 0.206 | 18.12 | 20 | 36.850 | 93.67 | ||
| 0.205 | 18.03 | 20 | 37.470 | 97.21 |
Figure 2Results of single-factor test. (A) The effect of extraction time on SW extraction amount. (B) The effect of extraction temperature on SW extraction amount. (C) The effect of formic acid concentration on SW extraction amount. (D) The effect of solid-liquid ratio on SW extraction amount.
Variance analysis of quadratics simulation of response surface.
| Variance Sources | Sum of Squares | Degree of Freedom | Mean Square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 5425.96 | 14 | 387.57 | 4.62 | 0.0035 |
| A-Time | 14.78 | 1 | 14.78 | 0.18 | 0.6809 |
| B-Temperature | 208.6 | 1 | 208.6 | 2.49 | 0.1371 |
| C-Formic acid concentration | 621.36 | 1 | 621.36 | 7.41 | 0.0165 |
| D-Material-to-liquid ratio | 3.44 | 1 | 3.44 | 0.041 | 0.8424 |
| AB | 30.87 | 1 | 30.87 | 0.37 | 0.5537 |
| AC | 134.92 | 1 | 134.92 | 1.61 | 0.2253 |
| AD | 7.68 | 1 | 7.68 | 0.092 | 0.7666 |
| BC | 63.06 | 1 | 63.06 | 0.75 | 0.4005 |
| BD | 99.78 | 1 | 99.78 | 1.19 | 0.2938 |
| CD | 21.06 | 1 | 21.06 | 0.25 | 0.624 |
| A2 | 1556.09 | 1 | 1556.09 | 18.56 | 0.0007 |
| B2 | 1034.35 | 1 | 1034.35 | 12.34 | 0.0035 |
| C2 | 2128.88 | 1 | 2128.88 | 25.39 | 0.0002 |
| D2 | 1798.23 | 1 | 1798.23 | 21.44 | 0.0004 |
| Residual | 1173.95 | 14 | 83.85 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 544.03 | 10 | 54.4 | 0.35 | 0.9213 |
| Pure Error | 629.92 | 4 | 157.48 | ||
| Cor Total | 6599.92 | 28 |
Figure 3Response surface and contour diagram of interaction of different factors on SW extraction rate. (A,D) Response surface and the contour plot of the interaction of extraction time and ultrasonic temperature to SW extraction rate. (B,E) Response surface and the contour plot of the interaction of extraction time and formic acid concentration to SW extraction rate. (C,F) Response surface and the contour plot of the interaction of extraction time and material-solvent ratio to SW extraction rate. (G,J) Response surface and the contour plot of the interaction of ultrasonic temperature and formic acid concentration to SW extraction rate. (H,K) Response surface and the contour plot of the interaction of ultrasonic temperature and material-solvent ratio to SW extraction rate. (I,L) Response surface and the contour plot of the interaction of formic acid concentration and material-solvent ratio to SW extraction rate.
Process validation test results.
| The Sample Weight (g) | Content of SW (μg/g) | Average Value (μg/g) | RSD/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.213 | 220.657 | 220.572 | 2.02 |
| 0.207 | 214.493 | ||
| 0.21 | 220 | ||
| 0.207 | 227.053 | ||
| 0.213 | 220.657 |
Lethality rate of A. oxytropis after irradiation with 12C6+ heavy-ion beams.
| Irradiation Dose | Number of Growing Colonies in Irradiation Group | Number of Growing Colonies in Control Group | Average Lethality Rate (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 13 | 69.23 ± 7.69 |
| 60 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 66.67 ± 4.44 |
| 80 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 80.95 ± 4.12 |
| 100 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 88.09 ± 4.12 |
| 120 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 97.43 ± 4.44 |
| 140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 100.00 ± 0.00 |
Figure 4Cylindrical chart of the SW content of swainsonine-producing mutants by 12C6+ heavy ion beams. (Group C was the original strain of A. oxytropis. * p < 0.05 compared with group C, ** p < 0.01 compared with group C.).
Figure 5The mycelial morphology of strain in liquid medium. ((a) was mutant 55, (b) was mutant 63, (c) was mutant 64, (d) was mutant 70, (e) was mutant 2, (f) was mutant 61, (g,h) were original strains).
Figure 6The colonial morphology of strain in PDA medium. (a) was mutant 55, (b) was mutant 64, (c) was mutant 63, (d) was mutant 70, (e) was mutant 2, (f) was mutant 61, (g,h) were original strains.
Results of stability test for SW production of mutant strains.
| Group | Content of SW (μg/g) | The Content of SW after Subculture (μg/g) | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 195.57 ± 10.67 | 217.03 ± 8.64 | Instability |
| 55 | 317.79 ± 4.16 | 314.80 ± 7.23 | Stability |
| 61 | 156.99 ± 7.97 | 160.54 ± 8.24 | Stability |
| 63 | 263.57 ± 3.77 | 211.37 ± 11.48 | Instability |
| 64 | 387.44 ± 8.57 | 394.27 ± 14.91 | Stability |
| 70 | 469.64 ± 8.66 | 473.13 ± 6.29 | Stability |
Figure 7Correlation analysis of QC samples.
Figure 8PCA analysis of total samples (A_61 represented mutant 61 with low SW yield, A_C represented the original strain, A_70 represented mutant 70 with high SW yield).
Difference analysis results of metabolites.
| Compared Samples | Num. of Total Ident. | Num. of Total Sig. | Num. of Sig. Up | Num. of Sig. Down |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A_61. vs. A_C | 843 | 186 | 171 | 15 |
| A_70. vs. A_C | 843 | 251 | 130 | 121 |
| A_61. vs. A_70 | 843 | 331 | 254 | 77 |
Figure 9Venn diagram of differential metabolites.
Figure 10Volcano plots of differentially metabolites. (a) Volcano plots of differentially metabolites of mutant 61 and the original strain. (b) Volcano plots of differentially metabolites of mutant 70 and the original strain. (c) Volcano plots of differentially metabolites of mutant 61 and mutant 70.
Figure 11Clustering heatmap of total differential metabolites. The specific metabolite information is provided in Figure S1.
Figure 12Bubble chart of KEGG enrichment results of differential metabolites between mutant 61 and the original strain. The size of the bubble indicates the number of genes enriched in the pathway.
Figure 13Bubble chart of KEGG enrichment results of differential metabolites between mutant 70 and the original strain. The size of the bubble indicates the number of genes enriched in the pathway.
Figure 14Bubble chart of KEGG enrichment results of differential metabolites between mutant 61 and mutant 70. The size of the bubble indicates the number of genes enriched in the pathway.
Scheme 1SW biosynthetic pathway in A. oxytropis.