Xi Chen1, Chengsong Xie1, Lixin Sun1, Jinhui Ding2, Huaibin Cai1. 1. Transgenics Section, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America. 2. Bioinformatics Core, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States of America.
Abstract
Metabolic homeostasis is critical for all biological processes in the brain. The metabolites are considered the best indicators of cell states and their rapid fluxes are extremely sensitive to cellular changes. While there are a few studies on the metabolomics of Parkinson's disease, it lacks longitudinal studies of the brain metabolic pathways affected by aging and the disease. Using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC/MS), we generated the metabolomics profiling data from the brains of young and aged male PD-related α-synuclein A53T transgenic mice as well as the age- and gender-matched non-transgenic (nTg) controls. Principal component and unsupervised hierarchical clustering analyses identified distinctive metabolites influenced by aging and the A53T mutation. The following metabolite set enrichment classification revealed the alanine metabolism, redox and acetyl-CoA biosynthesis pathways were substantially disturbed in the aged mouse brains regardless of the genotypes, suggesting that aging plays a more prominent role in the alterations of brain metabolism. Further examination showed that the interaction effect of aging and genotype only disturbed the guanosine levels. The young A53T mice exhibited lower levels of guanosine compared to the age-matched nTg controls. The guanosine levels remained constant between the young and aged nTg mice, whereas the aged A53T mice showed substantially increased guanosine levels compared to the young mutant ones. In light of the neuroprotective function of guanosine, our findings suggest that the increase of guanosine metabolism in aged A53T mice likely represents a protective mechanism against neurodegeneration, while monitoring guanosine levels could be applicable to the early diagnosis of the disease.
Metabolic homeostasis is critical for all biological processes in the brain. The metabolites are considered the best indicators of cell states and their rapid fluxes are extremely sensitive to cellular changes. While there are a few studies on the metabolomics of Parkinson's disease, it lacks longitudinal studies of the brain metabolic pathways affected by aging and the disease. Using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC/MS), we generated the metabolomics profiling data from the brains of young and aged male PD-related α-synuclein A53Ttransgenic mice as well as the age- and gender-matched non-transgenic (nTg) controls. Principal component and unsupervised hierarchical clustering analyses identified distinctive metabolites influenced by aging and the A53T mutation. The following metabolite set enrichment classification revealed the alanine metabolism, redox and acetyl-CoA biosynthesis pathways were substantially disturbed in the aged mouse brains regardless of the genotypes, suggesting that aging plays a more prominent role in the alterations of brain metabolism. Further examination showed that the interaction effect of aging and genotype only disturbed the guanosine levels. The young A53Tmice exhibited lower levels of guanosine compared to the age-matched nTg controls. The guanosine levels remained constant between the young and aged nTgmice, whereas the aged A53Tmice showed substantially increased guanosine levels compared to the young mutant ones. In light of the neuroprotective function of guanosine, our findings suggest that the increase of guanosine metabolism in aged A53Tmice likely represents a protective mechanism against neurodegeneration, while monitoring guanosine levels could be applicable to the early diagnosis of the disease.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the most common degenerative movement disorder [1]. Although the metabolites are very sensitive to cellular changes and serve as the best indicators of cell states [2], only a few studies have used metabolomics to evaluate metabolic signatures and pathways involved in PD. The pentose phosphate pathway has been reported as being affected the most in the postmortem brains of PDpatients [3]. While the urate levels are significantly reduced, the glutathione is significantly increased in the plasma of PDpatients [4-6]. However, there lack longitudinal studies for monitoring the alterations of metabolites in the brain during the progression of the disease. In addition, the impact of aging itself on the brain metabolism remains to be determined.The A53T missense mutation of α-synuclein is the first genetic causal factor linked to PD [7]. In a line of α-synuclein transgenic mice [8], overexpression of human α-synuclein A53T mutation recapitulates two canonical PD-related neuropathological abnormalities, namely progressive loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons and formation α-synuclein-positive aggregates [9]. In addition to modeling PD-related neuron loss, these A53Ttransgenic mice could be also useful in studying the metabolic pathways affected by PD and aging.To understand how the PD-related α-synuclein A53T mutation alters brain metabolism during aging, the brains of 3-month (young) and 18-month-old (aged) A53Ttransgenic mice and age-matched non-transgenic (nTg) controls were collected for metabolomics profiling. A series of statistical analyses of the profiling data revealed multiple metabolic pathways affected by aging and the disease.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
All mouse work follows the guidelines approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, US National Institutes of Health.
Transgenic mice
The Pitx3-IRES2-tTA/tetO-A53T bigenic mice were generated as previously described [8]. Mice were housed in a 12h light/dark cycle and fed regular diet libitum. Four groups of mice were used for this study: 3-month and 18-month-old nTgmice, and 3-month and 18-month-old A53T bigenic mice. Each group had eight male mice. The forebrain and midbrain tissues were collected for global untargeted metabolic profiling by Metabolon Inc. (Durham, NC).
Sample preparation
Samples were prepared using the automated MicroLab STAR system from Hamilton Company. A recovery standard was added prior to the first step in the extraction process for QC purposes. Sample preparation was conducted using aqueous methanol extraction process to remove the protein fraction while allowing maximum recovery of small molecules. The resulting extract was divided into four fractions: one for analysis by UPLC/MS/MS (positive mode), one for UPLC/MS/MS (negative mode), one for GC/MS, and one for backup. Samples were placed briefly on a TurboVap (Zymark) to remove the organic solvent. Each sample was then frozen and dried under vacuum. Samples were then prepared for the appropriate instrument, either UPLC/MS/MS or GC/MS.
Ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/tandem Mass Spectroscopy
The UPLC/MS/MS portion of the platform was based on a Waters ACQUITY ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and a Thermo-Finnigan linear trap quadrupole (LTQ) mass spectrometer, which consisted of an electrospray ionization (ESI) source and linear ion-trap (LIT) mass analyzer. The sample extract was dried then reconstituted in acidic or basic LC-compatible solvents, each of which contained 8 or more injection standards at fixed concentrations to ensure injection and chromatographic consistency. One aliquot was analyzed using acidic positive ion optimized conditions and the other using basic negative ion optimized conditions in two independent injections using separate dedicated columns. Extracts reconstituted in acidic conditions were gradient eluted using water and methanol containing 0.1% formic acid, while the basic extracts, which also used water/methanol, contained 6.5mM Ammonium Bicarbonate. The MS analysis alternated between MS and data-dependent MS2 scans using dynamic exclusion. Raw data files are archived and extracted as described below.
Gas chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy
The samples destined for GC/MS analysis were re-dried under vacuum desiccation for a minimum of 24h prior to being derivatized under dried nitrogen using bistrimethyl-silyl-triflouroacetamide (BSTFA). The GC column was 5% phenyl and the temperature ramp was from 40° to 300°C in a 16 minute period. Samples were analyzed on a Thermo-Finnigan Trace DSQ fast-scanning single-quadrupole mass spectrometer using electron impact ionization. The instrument was tuned and calibrated for mass resolution and mass accuracy on a daily basis. Raw data files are archived and extracted as described below.
Data extraction and compound identification
Raw data was extracted, peak-identified and QC processed using Metabolon’s hardware and software. These systems are built on a web-service platform utilizing Microsoft’s.NET technologies, which run on high-performance application servers and fiber-channel storage arrays in clusters to provide active failover and load-balancing. Compounds were identified by comparison to library entries of purified standards or recurrent unknown entities. More than 3500 commercially available purified standard compounds have been acquired and registered into LIMS for distribution to both the LC and GC platforms for determination of their analytical characteristics.
Statistics and bioinformatics
Missing values (if any) are assumed to be below the level of detection. However, metabolites that were detected in all samples from one or more groups, but not in samples from other groups were assumed to be near the lower limit of detection in the groups in which they were not detected. In this case, the lowest detected level of these metabolites was imputed for samples in which that biochemical was not detected. Following scale normalization and imputation with minimum observed values for each compound, two-way ANOVA and one-way ANOVA tests were used to identify metabolites that differed significantly between experimental groups. Principal component analysis was performed using R, a statistical computing environment (www.r-project.org). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using complete linkage and Pearson rank correlation distance on the normalized metabolites in R. The web-based metabolomics data processing tool MetaboAnalyst 2.0 was used for pathway and metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) analysis. See http://www.metaboanalyst.ca for detailed methodology [10]. The database MetaboAnalyst 2.0 used for the metabolic pathway analysis is Human Metabolom database (HMDB), Small Molecule Pathway Database (SMPDB) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [10]. Beside two-way ANOVA, Random forest (RF) classification method in R package was applied to the scaled and imputed metabolite data; the RF method was implemented with Breiman’s random forest algorithm [11]. RF is a machine learning method. Comparing to other methods applied in analyzing metabolomics data, such as projection to latent structures (PLS), support vector machine (SVM) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), RF has simple theory, fast speed and is insensitive to noise. RF is getting more frequent in metabolomics data analysis [12]. Values of mean decrease in accuracy calculated from RF classification analysis were used to identify the metabolites that are significantly affected by aging. Mean Decrease Accuracy is a score used to describe how importantly a compound contributes to the group classification. It measures how much classification error would be reduced when the certain metabolite was counted in the model. Therefore the metabolites with a higher mean decrease in accuracy are more important for the classification of the data [11].
Results
Aging exerts more significant impact on the alterations of metabolites
The principal component analysis (PCA) was used to quantitatively compare the global metabolomics profiling data collected from the four groups of mice. Based on the top two principal components, the aged mice appeared as a separate group from the young ones, whereas the A53T bigenic groups could not be distinguished from the nTg groups (Fig 1).
Fig 1
Principle component analysis (PCA) of brain metabolites influenced by aging and Parkinson’s disease-related α-synuclein A53T mutation.
PCA plot showing a segregation of the metabolites affected in all the aged mouse brain samples (colored by dark and light red for A53T and nTg mice) from the young ones (colored by dark and light blue for A53T and nTg mice). The first principle component (PC1) accounts for 27% of the overall variability; the second principle component (PC2) accounts for 13% of the overall variability.
Principle component analysis (PCA) of brain metabolites influenced by aging and Parkinson’s disease-related α-synuclein A53T mutation.
PCA plot showing a segregation of the metabolites affected in all the aged mouse brain samples (colored by dark and light red for A53T and nTgmice) from the young ones (colored by dark and light blue for A53T and nTgmice). The first principle component (PC1) accounts for 27% of the overall variability; the second principle component (PC2) accounts for 13% of the overall variability.We subsequently identified the metabolites with significant changes between young and aged mice using a false discovery rate (FDR) of q < 0.05 in two-way ANOVA test, a commonly used filtering criterion for large-scale data analysis [13]. The test allowed us to capture the maximum number of compounds that potentially changed between groups. We observed that 58 metabolites were significantly disturbed during aging (Fig 2). Among them, 25 metabolites (8.7%) were increased, whereas 33 metabolites (11.4%) were decreased in the aged mice. Using hierarchical clustering on the profile of these 58 metabolites, the mice were strictly separated into large groups according to age difference and several interesting metabolite clusters became apparent as well (Fig 2). One of these clusters contained alanine and its products. The alanine metabolism pathway reflected energy demand in mouse brain [14]. In addition, various intermediates and products of oxidation-reduction pathway were altered, such as oxidized and reduced glutathione that both decreased in the aged brains (Fig 2).
Fig 2
Hierarchical clustering of metabolites affected by aging.
There are 58 metabolites significantly affected by aging from a two-way ANOVA test. The unsupervised hierarchical clustering plot shows that an age-dependent segregation of these metabolites. The scaled intensity of 58 metabolites is relatively depicted according to the color key shown on the right. Red indicates high intensity levels; blue, low intensity levels.
Hierarchical clustering of metabolites affected by aging.
There are 58 metabolites significantly affected by aging from a two-way ANOVA test. The unsupervised hierarchical clustering plot shows that an age-dependent segregation of these metabolites. The scaled intensity of 58 metabolites is relatively depicted according to the color key shown on the right. Red indicates high intensity levels; blue, low intensity levels.Following hierarchical cluster analysis, we performed metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) to identify which pathways were affected by those 58 distinguishing metabolites. Our results indicated that the best metabolites to predict age affect were in redox homeostasis, lipid synthesis and amino acid metabolism pathways (Fig 3A). In addition, we performed the metabolome view analysis to demonstrate whether a metabolite node was affected. We confirmed the finding that the β-alanine metabolism, glutathione metabolism and pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis pathways were disturbed in the aged mouse brains (Fig 3B).
Fig 3
Metabolite pathway affected by aging.
(A) Summary plot for the metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) are ranked by Holm p-value. Holm p-value is the p value adjusted by Holm-Bonferroni test that is a method to counteract the problem of multiple comparisons and is widely used for large-scale data analysis. (B) Metabolome view shows key nodes in metabolic pathways that have been significantly altered with aging. The y-axis represents unadjusted p value from pathway enrichment analysis. The x-axis represents increasing metabolic pathway impact according to the betweenness centrality from pathway topology analysis.
Metabolite pathway affected by aging.
(A) Summary plot for the metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) are ranked by Holm p-value. Holm p-value is the p value adjusted by Holm-Bonferroni test that is a method to counteract the problem of multiple comparisons and is widely used for large-scale data analysis. (B) Metabolome view shows key nodes in metabolic pathways that have been significantly altered with aging. The y-axis represents unadjusted p value from pathway enrichment analysis. The x-axis represents increasing metabolic pathway impact according to the betweenness centrality from pathway topology analysis.
Identification of signature metabolites as biomarkers of aged brains
The metabolic differences between young and aged mice led us to test whether they can be used as biomarkers to reliably and accurately classify the two age groups. To separate different groups of samples by selection of a subset of signature metabolites or genes is applied widely with large-scale data sets, such as metabolomics and gene expression analyses [15, 16]. Accordingly, we first conducted one-way ANOVA test separately with nTg and A53T two genetic subgroups. In the nTg subgroup, there were 10 metabolites significantly changed in the aged mice comparing to the young ones, while in the A53T subgroup 24 metabolites were differentially altered in the aged animals (Table 1 and S1 Data). After intersecting the set of 10 metabolites from nTg and 24 metabolites from A53T, we found four overlapping metabolites: carnosine, N-acetylaspartate (NAA), pantothenate and phosphopantetheine (Table 1). We also did the Random Forests (RF) analysis to validate the results from one-way ANOVA test. RF is one such learning algorithm that can discriminate the two groups by estimating the importance of each variable to the classification [11]. The “mean decrease accuracy” indicated how much a certain metabolite contributes to separation of the two test groups [11]. We conducted RF analysis with the same two genetic subgroups nTg and A53T as one-way ANOVA test. In the nTg subgroup, there were 19 metabolites significantly changed in the aged mice compared to the young ones, while for A53Tmice, totally 23 metabolites were differentially altered in the aged animals (Table 2 and S1 Data). We did the intersection as well with the sets of 19 metabolites and 23 metabolites. Finally eight overlapping metabolites were identified (Fig 4A). Among them, four metabolites were identified by the ANOVA test as shown above, and the other four were homocarnosine, anserine, gamma-glutamylglutamate and adenosine. Following one-way ANOVA test and RF analysis, we performed hierarchical clustering on these eight metabolites. As expected, all mouse samples can be separated reliably based on the age (Fig 4A). Therefore, these metabolites show strong predictive value on the age factors regardless of genotype difference.
Table 1
A list of metabolites substantially affected by aging based on the one-way ANOVA test.
Metabolite Name
q-value
Super-pathway
nTg (18M vs. 3M)
Carnosine
0.0004
Amino acid
N-acetylaspartate (NAA)
0.0004
Amino acid
Pantothenate
0.0013
Cofactor
3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) lactate
0.0163
Amino acid
Homocarnosine
0.0163
Amino acid
Phosphopantetheine
0.0176
Cofactor
glutathione, reduced
0.0177
Amino acid
Fructose
0.0276
Carbohydrate
cytidine 5’-diphophocholine
0.0401
Lipid
scyllo-inositol
0.0485
Lipid
A53T (18M vs. 3M)
Guanosine
0.0005
Nucleotide
Carnosine
0.0012
Amino acid
Pantothenate
0.0023
Cofactor
Phosphopantetheine
0.0026
Cofactor
Adenosine
0.0030
Nucleotide
Desmosterol
0.0038
Lipid
lignocerate (24:0)
0.0046
Lipid
5-HETE
0.0046
Lipid
stearate, methyl ester
0.0065
Lipid
Putrescine
0.0111
Amino acid
Anserine
0.0155
Amino acid
3-phosphoglycerate
0.0175
Carbohydrate
Cholesterol
0.0209
Lipid
dehydroascorbate
0.0209
Cofactor
chiro-inositol
0.0215
Lipid
threonate
0.0215
Cofactor
glucose-6-phosphate
0.0351
Carbohydrate
caproate (6:0)
0.0363
Lipid
ethyl stearate
0.0388
Lipid
1-myristoylglycerophosphocholine
0.0388
Lipid
2-oleoylglycerophosphoserine
0.0388
Lipid
N-acetylaspartate (NAA)
0.0413
Amino acid
mannose-6-phosphate
0.0461
Carbohydrate
2-aminoadipate
0.0470
Amino acid
Table 2
A list of metabolites substantially affected by aging based on the Random Forests test.
Metabolite name
Mean decrease accuracy
Super-pathway
nTg (18M vs. 3M)
glutathione, oxidized
16.27
Amino acid
N-acetylaspartate (NAA)
16.08
Amino acid
carnosine
15.76
Amino acid
glutathione, reduced
15.26
Amino acid
gamma-glutamylglutamate
12.77
Amino acid
glutamine
12.49
Amino acid
3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) lactate
12.35
Amino acid
pantothenate
11.18
Cofactor
cytidine 5’-diphosphocholine
10.38
Lipid
adenosine 5’-monophosphate
9.48
Nucleotide
lanosterol
9.09
Lipid
homocarnosine
8.89
Amino acid
lysine
7.18
Amino acid
2-aminoadipate
6.71
Amino acid
phosphopantetheine
6.34
Cofactor
12-HETE
6.03
Lipid
anserine
5.80
Amino acid
leucine
5.46
Amino acid
adenosine
5.18
Nucleotide
A53T (18M vs. 3M)
guanosine
15.76
Nucleotide
phosphopantetheine
15.60
Cofactor
desmosterol
15.38
Lipid
pipecolate
14.19
Amino acid
pantothenate
11.79
Cofactor
carnosine
11.40
Amino acid
sucrose
9.70
Carbohydrate
scyllo-inositol
9.65
Lipid
5-HETE
9.61
Lipid
adenosine
9.60
Nucleotide
ergothioneine
9.59
Xenobiotics
stearate, methyl ester
9.33
Lipid
dehydroascorbate
9.17
Cofactor
lignocerate (24:0)
9.08
Lipid
anserine
8.97
Amino acid
cholesterol
8.92
Lipid
putrescine
5.85
Amino acid
homocarnosine
5.68
Amino acid
Palmitoyl ethanolamide
5.67
Lipid
chiro-inositol
5.63
Lipid
N-acetylaspartate (NAA)
5.61
Amino acid
3-phosphoglycerate
5.03
Carbohydreate
gamma-glutamylglutamate
5.00
Amino acid
Fig 4
Identification of Aging-related metabolite biomarker.
(A) Two-way ANOVA test (q value <0.05) and RF analysis (Mean decrease accuracy >5) identify eight metabolites significantly affected by aging. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering plot shows the segregation between aged and young samples. The scaled intensity of eight metabolites is relatively depicted according to the color key shown on the top. Red indicates high intensity levels; blue, low intensity levels. The q-value used here represents the measurement of the proportion of false positives incurred (also called the false discovery rate). (B) Scatter plots compare the scaled intensity of those eight metabolites from different sample groups.
Identification of Aging-related metabolite biomarker.
(A) Two-way ANOVA test (q value <0.05) and RF analysis (Mean decrease accuracy >5) identify eight metabolites significantly affected by aging. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering plot shows the segregation between aged and young samples. The scaled intensity of eight metabolites is relatively depicted according to the color key shown on the top. Red indicates high intensity levels; blue, low intensity levels. The q-value used here represents the measurement of the proportion of false positives incurred (also called the false discovery rate). (B) Scatter plots compare the scaled intensity of those eight metabolites from different sample groups.Carnosine is a dipeptide, composed of β-alanine and ι-histidine, an important compound involved in alanine metabolism [17]. In mammals, carnosine has high concentration in the skeletal muscle and the olfactory bulb [18]. Comparing to the extensive studies on muscle tissues, the functions of carnosine in brain are poorly understood [17]. Carnosine has been proposed to protect brains mainly through antioxidant, metal chelating, and antiglycative properties, like what it does in the muscles [19]. Homocarnosine, a carnosine analog, is more prevalent than carnosine in the mammalian brain [17]. Anserine is the most common variant of methylated carnosine analogs [17]. Our data showed that carnosine, homocarnosine and anserine were all highly accumulated in the aged mouse brains (Fig 4B), which may be related with their antioxidant activities to protect brain from excessive ROS stress during aging.NAA is localized primarily in neurons and is considered to be a putative neuronal marker [20]. Consistent with the previous studies [21, 22], we observed reduced NAA in the aged mice (Fig 4B). In addition, some recent research suggests that there is a strong positive correlation between concentrations of NAA and glutamate [23]. In our study, the levels of glutamate were also decreased in the aged mice like NAA (Fig 2). In contrast to glutamate reduction, glutamine concentration was somewhat increased in the aged mice. Glutamine is localized primarily in astrocytes, where glutamine synthetase is considered to be a marker of glial activity [24]. Therefore, the finding of increased glutamine levels could be indicative of glial proliferation (Fig 2), which often accompanies with neurodegeneration [23].
Metabolite guanosine shows age-dependent alterations in A53T bigenic mice
In the two-way ANOVA test, no metabolite showed significant alteration between A53T bigenic and nTgmice depending on genotype effects (S1 Data). We then conducted one-way ANOVA test with two age subgroups separately to identify the impact of genotypes on metabolites. In the young subgroup, only one metabolite guanosine was significantly altered in the A53Tmice compared to the nTg ones (Fig 5A and 5B). In the aged subgroup, however, no metabolite showed differential alterations between two genotypes (S1 Data). Further data analyses revealed that guanosine accumulated more in the aged A53Tmice compared to the young ones, whereas, no substantial alterations of guanosine levels were found in the young and aged nTg subgroups (Fig 5A and 5B). Therefore, guanosine was affected by a combination of genotype and age factors, as confirmed by the two-way ANOVA interaction test (S1 Data).
Fig 5
Guanosine metabolism is affected by both aging and A53T mutation.
(A) Scatter plot depicts the alteration of guanosine levels in different age and genotype groups. One-way ANOVA test, **q value <0.01; ***q value <0.001. (B) Line graph highlights the age-dependent changes of guanosine in A53T and nTg mice. One-way ANOVA test, ***q value <0.001. (C) Schematic diagram summarizes the alanine metabolic (in yellow shade) and acetyl-CoA biosynthesis (in blue shade) pathways mainly affected by aging, and the purine metabolic (in pink shade) pathway influenced by both aging and genotypes. The metabolites highlighted with the bold font represent the ones differentially altered between groups (q value < 0.05 in two-way ANOVA test).
Guanosine metabolism is affected by both aging and A53T mutation.
(A) Scatter plot depicts the alteration of guanosine levels in different age and genotype groups. One-way ANOVA test, **q value <0.01; ***q value <0.001. (B) Line graph highlights the age-dependent changes of guanosine in A53T and nTgmice. One-way ANOVA test, ***q value <0.001. (C) Schematic diagram summarizes the alanine metabolic (in yellow shade) and acetyl-CoA biosynthesis (in blue shade) pathways mainly affected by aging, and the purine metabolic (in pink shade) pathway influenced by both aging and genotypes. The metabolites highlighted with the bold font represent the ones differentially altered between groups (q value < 0.05 in two-way ANOVA test).
Discussion
Excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by oxidative reactions within the mitochondria has been implicated in many age-related neurological diseases, such as PD, Alzheimer’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [25, 26]. Reduced glutathione (GSH) is able to scavenge both ROS and xenobiotics within the cells, which leads to form the oxidized glutathione (GSSG), GSSG can then be returned to GSH by glutathione reductase (GSR) [27]. Here we found that both GSH and GSSG levels were decreased significantly in the aged mice (Fig 2). Decreased GSH in aged mice has been reported previously [28, 29]. A high GSH/GSSG ratio represents a properly functioning glutathione system observed normally in young animals, while a low GSH/GSSG ratio associates with aging models [30, 31]. In our study, the ratio of GSH to GSSG was not altered by either age or genotype (S1 Fig). The ratios of GSH to GSSG in four subgroups were all close to one. By contrast, previous studies show the levels of GSH are much higher than GSSG in the both young and old mouse brains [28, 32]. We speculate that the LC/MS platform used in our study cannot accurately detect GSH or some GSH was oxidized into GSSG during the preparation and storage of samples.β-alanine is the β form of the amino acid alanine, which is intimately linked with glutamate/glutamine cycling [33]. The ammonia from glutamate/glutamine transition in neurons is carried by alanine and leucine and returned to the astrocyte [34]. After deamination, alanine in the astrocyte is largely converted into lactate, which is released into the extracellular space and taken up by neurons [35, 36]. Many studies indicate that lactate is a main energy source for neurons and its utilization is necessary for long-term memory formation [36, 37]. Our results showed increased alanine levels in the aged mouse brains compared to the young ones, suggesting a possible compensatory mechanism in the aged brains to make up for the less energy production.Two reasons may be considered for the lack of metabolites affected by genotypes according to two-way ANOVA analysis. One is the large variation of metabolite data sets from different subgroups. The other is that the metabolic changes mainly occur in a small fraction of neurons, such as the nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons, which is likely undetectable when the whole brain is used for the assay. The in situ studies of brain metabolomics using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and positron emission tomography could be useful in identifying metabolite alterations in small brain regions.Guanosine is a guanine-based purine and can be phosphorylated to become several different forms (GMP, GDP and GTP), which affect multiple cellular processes, including cellular growth, differentiation and survival [38, 39]. Guanosine can exert protective effects against staurosporine- or β-amyloid-induced apoptosis [40, 41]. Recently the neuroprotective effects of guanosine in the central nervous system have also been identified in a PD-related cellular model system, which shows guanosine effectively prevent 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+)-induced PC12 cell apoptosis by stabilizing the mitochondrial membrane potential [42]. MPP+ induction can cause DA neurons damage and result in pathological symptoms similar to PD [43]. Guanosine also protects 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) treated SH-SY5Y cells (6-OHDA is widely used to mimic neuropathology of PD) to promote their survival through the apoptotic signaling pathway, including p-38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and protein kinase B [41]. In the A53Tmice, the DAneurodegeneration starts as early as 1 month of age [8], which is correlated with a significant reduction of guanosine levels in the young A53Tmice, suggesting that without the sufficient guanosine protection, the DA neurons are likely more vulnerable to the mutant α-synuclein-induced cytotoxicity. However, the underlying mechanism for the neuroprotective function of guanosine in A53T bigenic mice remains to be clarified.
Conclusion
In the present study we identified eight aging-related metabolite biomarkers, which are mainly involved in the alanine metabolism and acetyl-CoA biosynthesis pathways (Fig 5C). These two pathways interconnect closely and both contribute to the cellular energy homeostatic [14, 44]. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that purine metabolic pathway was disturbed by a combination of the age and genotype factors (Fig 5C). Urate, the end product of this pathway, has been considered as a biomarker for PD diagnosis [45]. We therefore suggest the purine pathway likely contribute to neuroprotection against DA neuron loss in PD.
The data sheet contains the scaled raw metabolic data.
(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.
The ratios of GSH to GSSG are presented in four different subgroups.
Authors: Akinobu Suzuki; Sarah A Stern; Ozlem Bozdagi; George W Huntley; Ruth H Walker; Pierre J Magistretti; Cristina M Alberini Journal: Cell Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Eilis J O'Reilly; Xiang Gao; Marc G Weisskopf; Honglei Chen; Michael A Schwarzschild; Donna Spiegelman; Alberto Ascherio Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: M P Rathbone; P J Middlemiss; J W Gysbers; C Andrew; M A Herman; J K Reed; R Ciccarelli; P Di Iorio; F Caciagli Journal: Prog Neurobiol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 11.685
Authors: Da-Wei Li; Guang-Ren Li; Yan Lu; Zhi-Qiang Liu; Ming Chang; Ming Yao; Wei Cheng; Lin-Sen Hu Journal: Int J Mol Med Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 4.101
Authors: Kathleen M Pettifer; Shucui Jiang; Christian Bau; Patrizia Ballerini; Iolanda D'Alimonte; Eva S Werstiuk; Michel P Rathbone Journal: Purinergic Signal Date: 2007-10-03 Impact factor: 3.765
Authors: Fatema Bhinderwala; Shulei Lei; Jade Woods; Jordan Rose; Darrell D Marshall; Eli Riekeberg; Aline De Lima Leite; Martha Morton; Eric D Dodds; Rodrigo Franco; Robert Powers Journal: Methods Mol Biol Date: 2019
Authors: Seyed Ali Goldansaz; An Chi Guo; Tanvir Sajed; Michael A Steele; Graham S Plastow; David S Wishart Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Caio M Massari; Marc López-Cano; Fabiana Núñez; Víctor Fernández-Dueñas; Carla I Tasca; Francisco Ciruela Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Carla I Tasca; Débora Lanznaster; Karen A Oliveira; Victor Fernández-Dueñas; Francisco Ciruela Journal: Front Cell Neurosci Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 5.505