B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters1,2,3, Ahmed Gilani1,4. 1. Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Abstract
Background: Adult glioblastomas (GBMs), IDH-wildtype, WHO grade 4 with FGFR3::TACC3 fusion have a better prognosis than standard GBMs. Whether this extended survival leads to late biological consequences is unknown. Although constituting only 4% of all GBMs, FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive GBMs manifest recurrent morphological features that allow prediction of this subtype, possibly affecting trial eligibility and/or targeted therapies. However, we have previously shown that an identical histological pattern can be present in wildtype examples, and conversely, occasional FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive tumors lack this stereotypic morphology; thus, ultimately molecular characterization is required. We now report for the first time an adult with FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive GBM showing archetypal histological features who developed extracranial metastases to provide further insight into potential behavior of the GBM type. Methods: Report of a 70-year-old man with left parietal GBM who developed 2 subsequent metastases, all 3 of which were assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and DNA methylation. Results: Biopsy-proven dural metastases occurred at 8 months and cervical lymph node metastasis at 12-month post-diagnosis before the patient succumbed at 23 months. By NGS, all 3 tumors showed FGFR3::TACC3 fusion as well as an additional PDZD2::TERT fusion of uncertain significance. DNA methylation profiling demonstrated mesenchymal subtype in the initial biopsy and RTKII subtype in subsequent dural and lymph node metastases, indicating intratumor spatial heterogeneity or temporal evolution. Conclusion: Rarely, FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive GBM patients may develop dural and extracranial metastatic spread, the latter with subclass switching on epigenomic analysis.
Background: Adult glioblastomas (GBMs), IDH-wildtype, WHO grade 4 with FGFR3::TACC3 fusion have a better prognosis than standard GBMs. Whether this extended survival leads to late biological consequences is unknown. Although constituting only 4% of all GBMs, FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive GBMs manifest recurrent morphological features that allow prediction of this subtype, possibly affecting trial eligibility and/or targeted therapies. However, we have previously shown that an identical histological pattern can be present in wildtype examples, and conversely, occasional FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive tumors lack this stereotypic morphology; thus, ultimately molecular characterization is required. We now report for the first time an adult with FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive GBM showing archetypal histological features who developed extracranial metastases to provide further insight into potential behavior of the GBM type. Methods: Report of a 70-year-old man with left parietal GBM who developed 2 subsequent metastases, all 3 of which were assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and DNA methylation. Results: Biopsy-proven dural metastases occurred at 8 months and cervical lymph node metastasis at 12-month post-diagnosis before the patient succumbed at 23 months. By NGS, all 3 tumors showed FGFR3::TACC3 fusion as well as an additional PDZD2::TERT fusion of uncertain significance. DNA methylation profiling demonstrated mesenchymal subtype in the initial biopsy and RTKII subtype in subsequent dural and lymph node metastases, indicating intratumor spatial heterogeneity or temporal evolution. Conclusion: Rarely, FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive GBM patients may develop dural and extracranial metastatic spread, the latter with subclass switching on epigenomic analysis.
Authors: Ahmed Gilani; Andrew Donson; Kurtis D Davies; Susan L Whiteway; Jessica Lake; John DeSisto; Lindsey Hoffman; Nicholas K Foreman; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Adam L Green Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2019-12-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Daniel J Brat; Kenneth Aldape; Howard Colman; Eric C Holland; David N Louis; Robert B Jenkins; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Roger Stupp; Andreas von Deimling; Michael Weller Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Abigail K Suwala; Damian Stichel; Daniel Schrimpf; Sybren L N Maas; Martin Sill; Hildegard Dohmen; Rouzbeh Banan; Annekathrin Reinhardt; Philipp Sievers; Felix Hinz; Mirjam Blattner-Johnson; Christian Hartmann; Leonille Schweizer; Henning B Boldt; Bjarne Winther Kristensen; Jens Schittenhelm; Matthew D Wood; Guillaume Chotard; Rolf Bjergvig; Anirban Das; Uri Tabori; Martin Hasselblatt; Andrey Korshunov; Zied Abdullaev; Martha Quezado; Kenneth Aldape; Patrick N Harter; Matija Snuderl; Jürgen Hench; Stephan Frank; Till Acker; Sebastian Brandner; Frank Winkler; Pieter Wesseling; Stefan M Pfister; David E Reuss; Wolfgang Wick; Andreas von Deimling; David T W Jones; Felix Sahm Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: David Capper; Damian Stichel; Felix Sahm; David T W Jones; Daniel Schrimpf; Martin Sill; Simone Schmid; Volker Hovestadt; David E Reuss; Christian Koelsche; Annekathrin Reinhardt; Annika K Wefers; Kristin Huang; Philipp Sievers; Azadeh Ebrahimi; Anne Schöler; Daniel Teichmann; Arend Koch; Daniel Hänggi; Andreas Unterberg; Michael Platten; Wolfgang Wick; Olaf Witt; Till Milde; Andrey Korshunov; Stefan M Pfister; Andreas von Deimling Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Tejus A Bale; Sameer F Sait; Matthias A Karajannis; Marc K Rosenblum; Jamal Benhamida; Ryan Ptashkin; Sofia Haque; Liliana Villafania; Martin Sill; Justyna Sadowska; Razia B Akhtar; Benjamin Liechty; Rupa Juthani; Marc Ladanyi; Mary Fowkes Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 15.887