Literature DB >> 36133796

A decade of underwater noise research in support of the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive.

Nathan D Merchant1,2, Rosalyn L Putland1, Michel André3, Eric Baudin4, Mario Felli5, Hans Slabbekoorn6, René Dekeling7.   

Abstract

Underwater noise from human activities is now widely recognised as a threat to marine life. Nevertheless, legislation which directly addresses this source of pollution is lacking. The first (and currently only) example globally is Descriptor 11 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), adopted by the European Union in 2008, which requires that levels of underwater noise pollution do not adversely affect marine ecosystems. The MSFD has stimulated a concerted research effort across Europe to develop noise monitoring programmes and to conduct research towards specifying threshold values which would define 'Good Environmental Status' (GES) for underwater noise. Here, we chart the progress made during the first decade of Descriptor 11's implementation: 2010-2020. Several international joint monitoring programmes have been established for impulsive and continuous noise, enabling ecosystem-scale assessment for the first time. Research into the impact of noise on individual animals has grown exponentially, demonstrating a range of adverse effects at various trophic levels. However, threshold values for GES must be defined for 'populations of marine animals.' Population-level consequences of noise exposure can be modelled, but data to parameterise such models are currently unavailable for most species, suggesting that alternative approaches to defining GES thresholds will be necessary. To date, the application of measures to reduce noise levels (quieting/noise abatement) has been limited. To address this, the EU in 2021 identified an explicit need to reduce underwater noise pollution in its waters. Delivering on this ambition will require further research focused on the development and implementation of quieting measures. Crown
Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Joint monitoring; MSFD; Noise abatement; Population consequences; Underwater noise

Year:  2022        PMID: 36133796      PMCID: PMC9472084          DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ocean Coast Manag        ISSN: 0964-5691            Impact factor:   4.295


  47 in total

1.  Evidence that ship noise increases stress in right whales.

Authors:  Rosalind M Rolland; Susan E Parks; Kathleen E Hunt; Manuel Castellote; Peter J Corkeron; Douglas P Nowacek; Samuel K Wasser; Scott D Kraus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Monitoring ship noise to assess the impact of coastal developments on marine mammals.

Authors:  Nathan D Merchant; Enrico Pirotta; Tim R Barton; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Effects of ambient and boat noise on hearing and communication in three fish species living in a marine protected area (Miramare, Italy).

Authors:  Antonio Codarin; Lidia E Wysocki; Friedrich Ladich; Marta Picciulin
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  Source specific sound mapping: Spatial, temporal and spectral distribution of sound in the Dutch North Sea.

Authors:  Hüseyin Özkan Sertlek; Hans Slabbekoorn; Carel Ten Cate; Michael A Ainslie
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 5.  The soundscape of the Anthropocene ocean.

Authors:  Carlos M Duarte; Lucille Chapuis; Shaun P Collin; Daniel P Costa; Reny P Devassy; Victor M Eguiluz; Christine Erbe; Timothy A C Gordon; Benjamin S Halpern; Harry R Harding; Michelle N Havlik; Mark Meekan; Nathan D Merchant; Jennifer L Miksis-Olds; Miles Parsons; Milica Predragovic; Andrew N Radford; Craig A Radford; Stephen D Simpson; Hans Slabbekoorn; Erica Staaterman; Ilse C Van Opzeeland; Jana Winderen; Xiangliang Zhang; Francis Juanes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Ambient noise dynamics in a heavy shipping area.

Authors:  G Bazile Kinda; Florent Le Courtois; Yann Stéphan
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.553

7.  A new context-based approach to assess marine mammal behavioral responses to anthropogenic sounds.

Authors:  W T Ellison; B L Southall; C W Clark; A S Frankel
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  High rates of vessel noise disrupt foraging in wild harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena).

Authors:  Danuta Maria Wisniewska; Mark Johnson; Jonas Teilmann; Ursula Siebert; Anders Galatius; Rune Dietz; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Spatial and Temporal Variability of Ambient Underwater Sound in the Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Mirko Mustonen; Aleksander Klauson; Mathias Andersson; Dominique Clorennec; Thomas Folegot; Radomił Koza; Jukka Pajala; Leif Persson; Jarosław Tegowski; Jakob Tougaard; Magnus Wahlberg; Peter Sigray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Underwater sound from vessel traffic reduces the effective communication range in Atlantic cod and haddock.

Authors:  Jenni A Stanley; Sofie M Van Parijs; Leila T Hatch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.