Literature DB >> 22182143

A new context-based approach to assess marine mammal behavioral responses to anthropogenic sounds.

W T Ellison1, B L Southall, C W Clark, A S Frankel.   

Abstract

Acute effects of anthropogenic sounds on marine mammals, such as from military sonars, energy development, and offshore construction, have received considerable international attention from scientists, regulators, and industry. Moreover, there has been increasing recognition and concern about the potential chronic effects of human activities (e.g., shipping). It has been demonstrated that increases in human activity and background noise can alter habitats of marine animals and potentially mask communications for species that rely on sound to mate, feed, avoid predators, and navigate. Without exception, regulatory agencies required to assess and manage the effects of noise on marine mammals have addressed only the acute effects of noise on hearing and behavior. Furthermore, they have relied on a single exposure metric to assess acute effects: the absolute sound level received by the animal. There is compelling evidence that factors other than received sound level, including the activity state of animals exposed to different sounds, the nature and novelty of a sound, and spatial relations between sound source and receiving animals (i.e., the exposure context) strongly affect the probability of a behavioral response. A more comprehensive assessment method is needed that accounts for the fact that multiple contextual factors can affect how animals respond to both acute and chronic noise. We propose a three-part approach. The first includes measurement and evaluation of context-based behavioral responses of marine mammals exposed to various sounds. The second includes new assessment metrics that emphasize relative sound levels (i.e., ratio of signal to background noise and level above hearing threshold). The third considers the effects of chronic and acute noise exposure. All three aspects of sound exposure (context, relative sound level, and chronic noise) mediate behavioral response, and we suggest they be integrated into ecosystem-level management and the spatial planning of human offshore activities. ©2011 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22182143     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01803.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  27 in total

1.  The behavioural response of migrating humpback whales to a full seismic airgun array.

Authors:  Rebecca A Dunlop; Michael J Noad; Robert D McCauley; Eric Kniest; Robert Slade; David Paton; Douglas H Cato
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  A decade of underwater noise research in support of the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive.

Authors:  Nathan D Merchant; Rosalyn L Putland; Michel André; Eric Baudin; Mario Felli; Hans Slabbekoorn; René Dekeling
Journal:  Ocean Coast Manag       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.295

3.  Western gray whale behavioral response to seismic surveys during their foraging season.

Authors:  Glenn Gailey; Olga Sychenko; Mikhail Zykov; Alexander Rutenko; Arny Blanchard; Rodger H Melton
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Changes in humpback whale song occurrence in response to an acoustic source 200 km away.

Authors:  Denise Risch; Peter J Corkeron; William T Ellison; Sofie M Van Parijs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Behavioral responses to predatory sounds predict sensitivity of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise within a soundscape of fear.

Authors:  Patrick J O Miller; Saana Isojunno; Eilidh Siegal; Frans-Peter A Lam; Petter H Kvadsheim; Charlotte Curé
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Effects of airgun sounds on bowhead whale calling rates: evidence for two behavioral thresholds.

Authors:  Susanna B Blackwell; Christopher S Nations; Trent L McDonald; Aaron M Thode; Delphine Mathias; Katherine H Kim; Charles R Greene; A Michael Macrander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Blue whales respond to simulated mid-frequency military sonar.

Authors:  Jeremy A Goldbogen; Brandon L Southall; Stacy L DeRuiter; John Calambokidis; Ari S Friedlaender; Elliott L Hazen; Erin A Falcone; Gregory S Schorr; Annie Douglas; David J Moretti; Chris Kyburg; Megan F McKenna; Peter L Tyack
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Effects of nautical traffic and noise on foraging patterns of Mediterranean damselfish (Chromis chromis).

Authors:  Claudia Bracciali; Daniela Campobello; Cristina Giacoma; Gianluca Sarà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Short-term disturbance by a commercial two-dimensional seismic survey does not lead to long-term displacement of harbour porpoises.

Authors:  Paul M Thompson; Kate L Brookes; Isla M Graham; Tim R Barton; Keith Needham; Gareth Bradbury; Nathan D Merchant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Identifying modeled ship noise hotspots for marine mammals of Canada's Pacific region.

Authors:  Christine Erbe; Rob Williams; Doug Sandilands; Erin Ashe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.