| Literature DB >> 36133638 |
Tae-Kyung Kim1, Hae In Yong2, Ji Yoon Cha1, Yun Jeong Kim1, Samooel Jung2, Yun-Sang Choi1.
Abstract
The myofibril protein (MP) isolate-saccharide graft reactions was prepared using the Maillard reaction with saccharides. The effects of various saccharides on protein functionality and quality of the Maillard reaction were investigated and compared with those of MP. The grafting degree of the MP isolate-saccharide graft reaction was significantly higher in the reducing sugar-treated groups (lactose, glucose, fructose, and palatinose). The browning intensity of the MP isolate-saccharide graft reaction with fructose, sucrose, and erythitol was higher than that observed in the control reaction (p<0.05). MP that reacted with reducing sugars (glucose, fructose, palatinose, and lactose) had fainter bands than MP that reacted with non-reducing sugars (sucrose, erythitol, trehalose, sorbitol, and xylitol). MPs conjugated with glucose exhibited higher protein solubility. The palatinose and lactose treatments were maximum in water binding capacity, though no significant difference in oil binding capacity among the saccharide treatments was observed. The emulsion stability of the MP isolate-saccharide graft reaction with palatinose and erythitol was higher than that of the control reaction. Therefore, reducing sugars have good protein functionality in the MP isolate-saccharides graft reaction. © Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources.Entities:
Keywords: graft reaction; myofibril protein; reducing sugar; saccharide; structure
Year: 2022 PMID: 36133638 PMCID: PMC9478984 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2022.e36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 2636-0772
Fig. 1.Effect of various saccharide on grafting degree and browning index of conjugated myofibrillar protein.
a–g Significant difference among treatments was presented by different letters on a top of column (p<0.05).
Fig. 2.Protein profiles of conjugated myofibrillar protein with various saccharide.
Represented data was shown (n=3).
Effect of various saccharide type on instrument color of grafted sugar-protein
| Traits | Dextrose | Fructose | Sucrose | Palatinose | Erythitol | Lactose | Trehal | Sorbitol | Xylitol | Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIE L* | 48.82±0.74[ | 53.96±0.03[ | 81.26±0.05[ | 53.66±0.02[ | 85.37±0.09[ | 58.22±0.01[ | 75.23±0.02[ | 72.27±1.45[ | 74.97±0.03[ | 72.93±0.03[ |
| CIE a* | 10.50±0.37[ | 12.10±0.03[ | 0.02±0.03[ | 11.06±0.02[ | –0.50±0.02[ | 10.69±0.03[ | 1.69±0.02[ | 0.02±0.07[ | –0.22±0.02[ | –1.46±0.02[ |
| CIE b* | 19.05±0.83[ | 25.46±0.09[ | 16.05±0.03[ | 23.92±0.04[ | 15.11±0.12[ | 27.61±0.02[ | 21.86±0.01[ | 20.14±0.15[ | 21.39±0.01[ | 16.76±0.17[ |
| Color difference | 27.02±0.48[ | 24.88±0.11[ | 8.49±0.04[ | 24.07±0.07[ | 12.59±0.15[ | 21.95±0.12[ | 6.43±0.14[ | 3.98±0.30[ | 5.22±0.15[ | -[ |
All values are mean±SD of three replicates (n=3).
The color value of control was used as a standard to compare color differences between other treatments, and the color difference was calculated according to the CIE △E formula [(△L×2+△a×2+△b×2)1/2].
Means within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Fig. 3.Effect of various saccharide on protein solubility affected by pH (A) and NaCl concentration (B) of conjugated myofibrillar protein.
Fig. 4.Effect of various saccharide on water and oil binding capacity of conjugated myofibrillar protein.
a–e Different letters on top of column meant significant difference among treatments (p<0.05).
Fig. 5.Effect of various saccharide on emulsifying capacity and emulsion stability of conjugated myofibrillar protein.
a–d Different letters on top of column meant significant difference among treatments (p<0.05).