| Literature DB >> 26761800 |
Bung-Orn Hemung1, Koo Bok Chin2.
Abstract
Fish sarcoplasmic protein (SP) is currently dumped as waste from surimi industry and its recovery by practical method for being the non-meat ingredient in meat industry would be a strategy to utilize effectively the fish resource. This study was aimed to apply pH treatment for fish SP recovery and evaluated its effect on pork myofibrillar protein (MP) gel. The pH values of fish SP were changed to 3 and 12, and neutralized to pH 7 before lyophilizing the precipitated protein after centrifugation. Acid-treated fish SP (AFSP) showed about 4-fold higher recovery yield than that of alkaline-treated SP and water absorption capacity was also about 1.2-fold greater. Because of the high recovery yield and water absorption capacity, AFSP was selected to incorporate into MP with/without microbial transglutaminase (MTG). The effects of AFSP and MTG on the physicochemical and rheological characteristics of MP and MP gel were evaluated. MTG induced an increase shear stress of the MP mixture and increase the breaking force of MP gels. MP gel lightness was decreased by adding AFSP. MP gel with MTG showed higher cooking loss than that without MTG. A reduction of cooking loss was observed when the AFSP was added along with MTG, where the insoluble particles were found. Therefore, AFSP could be contributed as a water holding agent in meat protein gel.Entities:
Keywords: microbial transglutaminase; pH treatment; pork myofibrillar protein; sarcoplasmic proteins; water absorption capacity
Year: 2015 PMID: 26761800 PMCID: PMC4682510 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.1.50
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Properties of fish SP powders obtained from acid and alkaline treatments
| Characteristics | Treatments | |
|---|---|---|
| Acid-treated SP | Alkaline-treated SP | |
| Recovery yield (%) | 18.64 ± 1.11a | 4.56 ± 0.64b |
| Water absorption capacity (g/g sample) | 2.72 ± 0.08a | 2.32 ± 0.07b |
| Color values | ||
| Hunter | 92.17 ± 0.06a | 89.93 ± 0.46b |
| Hunter | 2.40 ± 0.00a | 1.63 ± 0.06b |
| Hunter | 7.27 ± 0.12a | 5.63 ± 0.06b |
Mean ± SE was calculated based on 3 replicates.
a,bDifferent letters in the same row denote differences (p≤0.05) between treatments.
Fig. 1.Rheological properties of MP mixture in the presence/absence of AFSP without (a) and with MTG (b).
Fig. 2.SDS-PAGE patterns of MP incubated at 4℃ for 6 h with/without MTG in the presence/absence of AFSP. Samples were taken before cooking (MP mixture) (a) and after cooking (MP gel) (b).
Properties of MP gels with/without adding AFSP in the presence/absence of MTG
| Properties | MTG (%) | Treatments | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MP | MP+AFSP | ||
| Breaking force (gf) | 0 | 95.02±4.70Bab | 96.77±8.11Bb |
| 0.5 | 354.99±35.55Aab | 333.98±24.75Ab | |
| Cooking loss (%) | 0 | 20.22±0.60Ba | 19.46±0.42Bb |
| 0.5 | 35.63±0.87Aa | 33.13±0.23Ab | |
| Hunter | 0 | 81.74 ± 0.39Aa | 80.34 ± 0.36Ab |
| 0.5 | 77.58 ± 0.44Ba | 76.88 ± 0.51Bb | |
| Hunter | 0 | −0.82 ± 0.22Aa | −0.94 ± 0.21Aa |
| 0.5 | −1.22 ± 0.27Ba | −2.08 ± 0.29Bb | |
| Hunter | 0 | −6.66 ± 0.25Ad | −5.14 ± 0.43Ac |
| 0.5 | −8.16 ± 0.34Bc | −6.18 ± 0.11Ab | |
Mean ± SE was calculated based on 5 replicates.
A,BDifferent letters in the same column denote differences (p≤0.05) between MTG levels.
a,bDifferent letters in the same row denote differences (p≤0.05) among treatments.
Fig. 3.Microstructure at × 2000 magnification of MP gels treated with MTG in the absence (a) and presence of AFSP (b).