| Literature DB >> 36133180 |
Chao Wang1,2, Hui Huang1,2, Miao-Rong Zhang1, Wei-Xing Song3, Long Zhang1, Rui Xi1, Lu-Jia Wang1, Ge-Bo Pan1.
Abstract
A heterojunction of ZnO/porous GaN (ZnO/PGAN) was fabricated and directly applied to a diode-type humidity sensor. ZnO disks were loaded onto PGAN using a spraying process. The structure and surface morphology of the ZnO/PGAN were characterized using X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. The heterojunction displayed an excellent diode nature, which was investigated using photoluminescence spectra and I-V characteristics. The excellent transport capability of ZnO/PGAN contributes to enhanced electron transfer, and hence results in high sensitivity and quick response/recovery properties under different relative humidity (RH) levels. In the range of 12-96% RH, a fast sensing response time as low as 7 s and a recovery time of 13 s can be achieved. The simple design of a ZnO/PGAN based humidity sensor highlights its potential in various applications. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 36133180 PMCID: PMC9473300 DOI: 10.1039/c8na00243f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Adv ISSN: 2516-0230
Fig. 1Schematic illustration of the fabrication process of ZnO/PGAN humidity sensors.
Fig. 2Diagram of the experimental setup for humidity sensing.
Fig. 3(a) SEM image of ZnO disks on silicon wafer. (b) SEM image of ZnO disks sprayed on PGAN. (c) EDS analysis results for all the area of the material in (b). (d) XRD pattern of ZnO/PGAN. (e) I–V characteristics of the ZnO/PGAN heterojunction and ZnO/Al2O3 samples measured at room temperature exposed to atmosphere. (f) Photoluminescence spectra of pristine ZnO and ZnO/PGAN heterojunctions.
Fig. 4(a) Stability of the measured resistance of the as-prepared sensor with the RH% in the range of 12–96%. (b) Typical hysteresis characteristics of the ZnO/PGAN heterojunction sensor. (c) Response and repeatability characteristics of the sensor when the relative humidity is changed rapidly between 12% RH and 96% RH. (d) Showing the response time and recovery time from 96% RH to 12% RH.
Performance comparison with previous humidity sensors
| Sensor type | Measuring range (%) | Sensitivity | Response time (s) | Recovery time (s) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetrapod-ZnO | 5–95 | 530 | 36 | 17 |
|
| ZnO/GO | 10–80 | 15.9 kHz/% RH | <1 | 19 |
|
| ZnO nanorods | 12–97 | 183 | 3 | 20 |
|
| Cd/ZnO | Air–95 | — | 3 | 5 |
|
| Al2O3/ZnO | 10–90 | — | 85 | 285 |
|
| Al/ZnS | 30–90 | 200 | 95 | 209 |
|
| ZnO/GaN | 12–96 | 161 | 7 | 13 | This work |
Fig. 5(a) The dynamic humidity sensing behavior of the ZnO/PGAN based device. (b) The sensitivity, response time and recovery time of the ZnO/PGAN HS under different RH. (c) Variations in the exhaled breath of a healthy person (E and I refer to the exhaling and inhaling, respectively).
Fig. 6(a) Schematic of H2O molecule interaction with the ZnO/PGAN HS. Electron transport on the ZnO/PGAN heterojunction (bottom-left) and effective electron transport on GaN (bottom-right). (b) Response curves of humidity sensors based on ZnO/PGAN, ZnO/Si and ZnO/Al2O3.