| Literature DB >> 36132276 |
Chulho Song1, Akhil Tayal1, Okkyun Seo2,1, Jaemyung Kim1, Yanna Chen2,1, Satoshi Hiroi2, L S R Kumara1, Kohei Kusada3, Hirokazu Kobayashi3, Hiroshi Kitagawa3, Osami Sakata1,2,4.
Abstract
Pd x Ru1-x nanoparticles (NPs) were observed to display enhanced CO oxidation activity with the maximum performance obtained at the composition x = 0.5. To unveil the origin of this superior CO oxidation activity, we investigated the local structure, valence state, and electronic properties of Pd x Ru1-x NPs using synchrotron-based X-ray techniques. Site specific information obtained from X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy revealed that the local disorder around Pd and Ru atoms and their valence state can be systematically tuned by varying the Pd composition. Furthermore, the XAFS results indicated a strong correlation among the structural and valence state and the observed CO oxidation catalytic properties of Pd x Ru1-x NPs. Hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HAXPES) analysis suggested that the capability of CO oxidation requires an optimum balance between the adsorption and desorption energy for CO adsorption and eventually conversion to CO2. A comparison between the experimental valence band (VB) HAXPES spectra of Pd x Ru1-x NPs and the linear combination of VB HAXPES spectra of Pd and Ru NPs revealed that the charge transfer from Pd to Ru occurs in the Pd x Ru1-x alloy at intermediate compositions, causing electron enrichment of the Ru surface. In addition, the maximum red-shift in the edge-position relative to that of bulk Pd/Ru and high structural disorder were observed for the PdRu alloy at the intermediate composition. This coupled behavior of structure and electronic properties followed the experimental trend of CO oxidation activity in this system. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 36132276 PMCID: PMC9473174 DOI: 10.1039/c8na00305j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Adv ISSN: 2516-0230
Reaction conditions for syntheses of PdRu1− NPs
| Sample | K2[PdCl4]/mg | RuCl3· | TEG/mL | PVP/mmol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ru | 783.2 | 50 | 1.0 | |
| Pd10Ru90 | 32.6 | 235.6 | 100 | 10.0 |
| Pd30Ru70 | 98.0 | 180.3 | 100 | 1.0 |
| Pd50Ru50 | 163.4 | 131.1 | 100 | 1.0 |
| Pd70Ru30 | 228.7 | 62.4 | 100 | 1.0 |
| Pd90Ru10 | 293.8 | 25.9 | 100 | 1.0 |
| Pd | 326.3 | 100 | 5.0 |
Fig. 1(a) First shell coordination number for Ru K-edge (blue closed squares) and Pd K-edge (red closed circles) for PdRu1− NPs as a function of x. (b) Catalytic activity T50 as a function of x. Here, T50 means the temperature for 50% conversion of CO to CO2.
Fig. 2Pd–Pd k3χ(k) spectra and amplitude after back-transform of FT spectra.
Average crystalline domain sizes of two crystallographic phases (hcp + fcc) for PdRu1− NPs obtained using the Rietveld refinement method[4]
| Sample | hcp | fcc |
|---|---|---|
| Ru | 11.6 | |
| Pd0.1Ru0.9 | 9.7 | |
| Pd0.3Ru0.7 | 7.5 | 4.9 |
| Pd0.5Ru0.5 | 3.8 | 3.4 |
| Pd0.7Ru0.3 | 2.0 | 4.5 |
| Pd0.9Ru0.1 | 10.6 | |
| Pd | 11.8 |
Fig. 3Relative shift in the edge position of Ru K-edge and Pd K-edge as a function of Pd content (x). The edge positions measured at the Ru K-edge and Pd K-edge were subtracted from those of Ru and Pd metal references, respectively.
Fig. 4(a) VB HAXPES spectra of PdRu1− NPs (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1). (b) Center of gravity of VB spectra as a function of Pd content (x).
Fig. 5Comparison between experimental VB HAXPES spectra (black lines) of PdRu1− NPs and linear combination (red lines) for VB HAXPES spectra of Pd and Ru NPs: (a) x = 0.1, (b) x = 0.3, (c) x = 0.5, (d) x = 0.7, and (e) x = 0.9. Here, the cyan areas indicate deviation of the experimental VB spectra from the calculated VB spectra. (f) Ru 3d core-level for PdRu1− NPs.