| Literature DB >> 36132133 |
Yi-Chao Wang1, Jing-Yan Tian2, Ying-Ying Han1, Yun-Fei Liu1, Si-Yao Chen1, Feng-Jun Guo1.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) has the greatest mortality rate among gynecological cancers, with a five-year survival rate of <50%. Contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy mostly fails in the case of OCs that are refractory, metastatic, recurrent, and drug-resistant. Emerging ultrasound (US)-mediated technologies show remarkable promise in overcoming these challenges. Absorption of US waves by the tissue results in the generation of heat due to its thermal effect causing increased diffusion of drugs from the carriers and triggering sonoporation by increasing the permeability of the cancer cells. Certain frequencies of US waves could also produce a cavitation effect on drug-filled microbubbles (MBs, phospholipid bilayers) thereby generating shear force and acoustic streaming that could assist drug release from the MBs, and promote the permeability of the cell membrane. A new class of nanoparticles that carry therapeutic agents and are guided by US contrast agents for precision delivery to the site of the ovarian tumor has been developed. Phase-shifting of nanoparticles by US sonication has also been engineered to enhance the drug delivery to the ovarian tumor site. These technologies have been used for targeting the ovarian cancer stem cells and protein moieties that are particularly elevated in OCs including luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, folic acid receptor, and vascular endothelial growth factor. When compared to healthy ovarian tissue, the homeostatic parameters at the tissue microenvironment including pH, oxygen levels, and glucose metabolism differ significantly in ovarian tumors. US-based technologies have been developed to take advantage of these tumor-specific alterations for precision drug delivery. Preclinical efficacy of US-based targeting of currently used clinical chemotherapies presented in this review has the potential for rapid human translation, especially for formulations that use all substances that are deemed to be generally safe by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.Entities:
Keywords: RNA therapeutics; chemotherapeutics; drug delivery; dual-mode imaging; microbubble; ultrasound
Year: 2022 PMID: 36132133 PMCID: PMC9483181 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.978603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Salient features of the delivery systems used for US-mediated targeting of ovarian tumors and reagents used for their designing.
| Delivery systems | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Structural features | Common use | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Microbubbles | Contains a gas core stabilized by a shell comprised of proteins, lipids or polymers with diameters ranging from 0.5 to 10μm | Delivery of small molecule drugs/biolo-gics to target tissues with or without US | Precision targeting that could enhance therapeutic index of caner chemo-therapeutic drugs and overcome drug resistance | Optimization of shell materials is tedious. |
| Nanodroplets | A hollow sphere of a polymer (lipidic nature) containing gas with size in the range of 1-10 nm | Transportation of pharmacologic or biological substances by escalating the rate of delivery of a specific volume of gas or fluid with or without US | High surface to volume ratio that enhances the rate of adsorption and the kinetics of reaction is accelerated; 3D structures could be fabricated; and precision targeting. | Generally unstable unless polymers such as PLGA or chitosan are used; payload is limited. |
| Micelles | Self-assembling polymeric structures (size, 10-100nm) with core/shell structures formed by amphiphilic block copolymers | Effective for poorly water soluble drugs | Increases blood half-life and protects against off-target toxicity of chemo-therapeutic drugs. | Poor drug-loading efficiency, and Pluronic rapidly degrades |
| Nanoliposomes | Nanoscale bilayer lipid vesicles having small sized vesicles of 20-100nm and large sized vesicles >100nm | Oligonucleo-tide and gene delivery | Encapsulate hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances individually or at the same time | Less responsive to US; poor storage stability; and small vesicle sizes and high surface energies result in strong van der Waals forces leading to strong attraction between nanoliposomes. |
| Commonly used reagents for designing the delivery systems | ||||
| Name | Structural features | Common use | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| PLGA | Synthetic aliphatic polymer with a polyester backbone that is formed through the copolymerization of lactic and glycolic acid monomers | Control release of small molecule drugs, peptides, and proteins | Biocompatible, biodegradable and has sufficient mechanical strength | PLGA matrices are not efficient in release of proteins. |
| PEG | Synthetic polymer | Biocon-jugation and increasing the blood circulation time | High solubility in aqueous medium, biocompatible and good tolerance | May cause development of immunogenicity. |
| Liquid PFC | Synthetic fluorochemicals in which all H atoms are replaced by F. | It has high specific gravity, moderate surface tension, low viscosity, and optical clarity and transparency that make it suitable for vitroretinal surgery | Good oxygen carriers and can be vaporized using acoustic or optical droplet vaporization methods (phase changeable) | Reduces platelet counts and causes allergic reaction. |
| Alginate/PFH nanodroplets | Alginate (natural polysaccharide) has high gelling property and high stability. PFH for oxygen loading. | Easily gets converted into MBs under the action of US at sufficiently high rarefaction pressure | Drug release system | Achieving high pressure for MB conversion from nanodroplets may be challenging. |
| ICG | A photosensitive dye with considerable absorption and fluorescence in the NIR wavelength region | ICG at NIR illuminates tissues. Upon absorption of the light by the tissue, US waves are generated by thermoelastic expansion. US transducers then receive the waves to reconstruct the tissue images. | Safe and US FDA approved. It has a deeper tissue penetration as light scattering in NIR region is lower than in the visible wavelength. | Displays photobleaching tendency, poor aqueous stability |
PLGA, Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid; PEG, polyethylene glycol; PFC, perfluorocarbon; PFH, perfluorohexane; NDs, nano droplets; ICG, indocynanine green; NIR, near infrared.
Figure 1Schematic of US-mediated drug delivery system targeting ovarian tumors. (A) Simplified diagrammatic representation of major US-mediated drug delivery systems discussed in the review are shown (refer to table 1 for their salient features). (B) An example of the delivery of therapeutics to the tumor site by MBs using a US-based technique in a murine model of ovarian cancer. Circulating MBs are exposed to sonication using a focused US transducer to induce cavitation. Tumor endothelial cells become more permeable to the drug-carrying vehicles due to mechanical disruption caused by cavitation. (C) US-mediated changes (shown in blue) including increased membrane fluidity by thermal effect, ion channel activation, pore formation, and endocytosis promote uptake of MBs by the cancer cells. Cavitation bubbles also cause ROS generation causing killing of the ovarian tumor cells.
Characteristics of ovarian cancer cell lines frequently used for various studies discussed here.
| Cell line | Morphology | Histological characterization | Original source | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2780 | Round | – | Tumor tissue | – |
| SKOV3 | Epithelial | Serous | Ascites | 1/2 |
| OVCAR3 | Epithelial | High-grade serous | Ascites from relapsed disease | 3 |
| OVCA433 | Epithelial | Serous adenocarcinoma | Tumor tissue | – |
| ID8 | Epithelial | Ovarian surface epithelial | C57BL/6 murine tumor tissue | – |
Except ID8, all are human-derived.
Figure 2Schematic of the key strategies for targeting various biomolecules of ovarian tumors by MBs or nanodroplets mediated by US-based technologies. Chemical drugs/biologics that have been used for targeting biomolecules include (A) CD133+ or ALDH1+ in ovarian cancer stem cells (in red); (B) CEA, the surface marker of OCs; (C) LHRH receptor I and FAR; (D) the angiogenic growth factor, VEGF; and (E) the hypoxic responsive protein HIF-1α (refer to for more details).
Strategies for targeted delivery of small molecule drugs/biologics to ovarian cancers by US mediation.
| Name | Delivery system | OCs assessed | OT models used | Advantages/lacuna |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEA | PTX-loaded phase-shifting PLGA nanoparticles with | SKOV3 | – | Suitable for killing OCs at early stage. Suitability for attenuating metastatic OCs not studied. |
| LHRHa | FITC-labeled LHRH-a/CPT-11/PLGA microspheres | A2780/DDP | Balb/c xenotransplanted with A2780/DDP | Suitable for killing OCs at the primary site as well as highly invasive types. The efficacy in metastatic condition has not been assessed. |
| FAR | FA surface-conjugated US-activable with PFP in the core and HMME in the phospholipid shell | SKOV3 | Nude mice xenografted with SKOV3 | Suitable for killing OCs at the primary site. Suitability for attenuating metastatic OCs not studied. |
| CSC | Apoptosis induction and stemness reduction by LIUS | CSCs from OVCAR5 and A2780 | Cis+LIUS reduced CD133+ cells in OVCAR5 and A2780 cell-harboring xenograft mice | Killed specific subpopulation of ovarian CSCs and suppressed ovarian tumor growth. |
| Angiogenesis | VEGF siRNA-complexed ABP was then combined with US for activating MBs | A2780 | Nude mice xenografted with A2780 | Effective in killing OCs at the primary site. Anti-metastatic potential not assessed. |
| Hypoxia | PFC (artificial oxygen carrier) loaded in lipid MBs for US-mediated therapy | PTX-resistant SKOV3 | Nude mice xenografted with SKOV3 | Effective in killing drug-resistant OCs and likely suitable for killing CSCs. |
| Immunogenic cell death | NPs loaded with oxaliplatin ICG (a photo-/sonosensitizer), and PFP (that undergoes phase transition under US treatment) | Syngenic mice xenografted with ID8 tumor cells | Induction of strong cytotoxic T cell response to murine tumor cells. ICD in human OCs has not been assessed. |
CEA, Carcinoembryonic antigen; LHRHa, leutinizing hormone releasing-hormone agonist; FAR, folic acid receptor; CSC, cancer stem cell; ALDH1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1; ABP, arginine-grafted bioreducible polymer; PTX, paclitaxel; Cis, cisplatin; PFP, perfluoro-n-pentane; PIO_NPs, PTX/ICG and oxygen loaded PLGA nanoparticles; LIUS, low intensity ultrasound.