Literature DB >> 17373668

Ovarian cancer screening with annual transvaginal sonography: findings of 25,000 women screened.

John R van Nagell1, Paul D DePriest, Frederick R Ueland, Christopher P DeSimone, Amy L Cooper, J Matt McDonald, Edward J Pavlik, Richard J Kryscio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate of all gynecologic malignancies, and most women present with advanced-stage disease. The current investigation was performed to determine the efficacy of annual transvaginal sonography (TVS) as a screening method for ovarian cancer.
METHODS: Annual TVS screening was performed on 25,327 women from 1987 to 2005. Asymptomatic women aged>or=50 years and women aged>or=25 years who had a family history of ovarian cancer were eligible for participation in this trial.
RESULTS: Among 364 patients (1.4%) with a persisting ovarian tumor on TVS who underwent exploratory laparoscopy or laparotomy with tumor removal, 35 primary invasive ovarian cancers, 9 serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential, and 7 cancers metastatic to the ovary were detected. Stage distribution was as follows: 28 patients had stage I disease, 8 patients had stage II disease, and 8 patients had stage III disease. Four patients died of disease, 2 patients died of other causes, and 38 patients were alive and well from 0.5 years to 15.8 years after diagnosis (mean, 5.3 years). Nine women developed ovarian cancer within 12 months of a negative screen (false-negative results), and 3 of these patients died of disease. TVS screening had a sensitivity of 85.0%, specificity of 98.7%, positive predictive value of 14.01%, and negative predictive value of 99.9%. After 107,276 screening years, there have been 7 ovarian cancer deaths in the annually screened population and 3 ovarian cancer deaths among women who were noncompliant. Excluding patients with nonepithelial or borderline ovarian malignancies, the survival of patients with ovarian cancer in the annually screened population was 89.9%+/-10.1% at 2 years and 77.2%+/-22.8% at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: TVS screening, when it was performed annually, was associated with a decrease in disease stage at detection and with case-specific ovarian cancer mortality, but it was not effective in detecting ovarian cancers in women who had normal ovarian volume. Copyright (c) 2007 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17373668     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  55 in total

Review 1.  Modern trends into the epidemiology and screening of ovarian cancer. Genetic substrate of the sporadic form.

Authors:  Maria Koutsaki; Apostolos Zaravinos; Demetrios A Spandidos
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Pathologic findings following false-positive screening tests for ovarian cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Sarah J Nyante; Amanda Black; Aimée R Kreimer; Máire A Duggan; J Daniel Carreon; Bruce Kessel; Saundra S Buys; Lawrence R Ragard; Karen A Johnson; Barbara K Dunn; Lois Lamerato; John M Commins; Christine D Berg; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K B Mathieu; D G Bedi; S L Thrower; A Qayyum; R C Bast
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Serum biomarker panels for the discrimination of benign from malignant cases in patients with an adnexal mass.

Authors:  Brian Nolen; Liudmila Velikokhatnaya; Adele Marrangoni; Koen De Geest; Aleksey Lomakin; Robert C Bast; Anna Lokshin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Ultrasound molecular imaging in a human CD276 expression-modulated murine ovarian cancer model.

Authors:  Amelie M Lutz; Sunitha V Bachawal; Charles W Drescher; Marybeth A Pysz; Jürgen K Willmann; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Early detection of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Partha M Das; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.851

7.  Integration of cell phone imaging with microchip ELISA to detect ovarian cancer HE4 biomarker in urine at the point-of-care.

Authors:  Shuqi Wang; Xiaohu Zhao; Imran Khimji; Ragip Akbas; Weiliang Qiu; Dale Edwards; Daniel W Cramer; Bin Ye; Utkan Demirci
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  HE4 combined with CA125: favorable screening tool for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Nasrin Ghasemi; Samira Ghobadzadeh; Mahnaz Zahraei; Hemn Mohammadpour; Salahadin Bahrami; Mohammad Bakhshi Ganje; Shokoh Rajabi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening in 1077 women after BRCA testing.

Authors:  Gabriel N Mannis; Julia E Fehniger; Jennifer S Creasman; Vanessa L Jacoby; Mary S Beattie
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  The preclinical natural history of serous ovarian cancer: defining the target for early detection.

Authors:  Patrick O Brown; Chana Palmer
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.