Literature DB >> 36131697

A scale development study: Hemodialysis comfort scale version II.

Cansu Kosar Sahin1, Sezgi Cinar Pakyuz2.   

Abstract

Aim: Aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable measuring tool in order to evaluate comfort of patients receiving hemodialysis treatment. Background: There has been available a scale developed to evaluate comfort of hemodialysis patients "HDCS (Hemodialysis Comfort Scale)." Due to HDCS consisted of nine items and evaluated comfort in two sub-dimensions, researchers who developed HDCS, stated that number of scale items and dimensions is not sufficient to fully evaluate comfort. Therefore, (Hemodialysis Comfort Scale Version II) HDCS-II was developed with this research and its development process were discussed in this article. Materials and
Methods: Sample of this methodological research was consisted of 436 chronic hemodialysis patients, treated at five hemodialysis centers between October 2018 and May 2019. In process of creation item pool, comfort theory and literature was examined. The items in the old scale were also revised and included. Thereby a new question pool of 87 items was created. This draft scale was sent for expert opinion. In validity of scale; content validity index, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used. In reliability study; Item analysis, cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient, parallel form reliability and item analysis based on upper-lower group averages were used.
Results: There was consistency between expert views relating to items in scale. According to exploratory factor analysis, scale consisted of six dimensions. Cronbach alpha coefficient of 26-item scale was 0.79. Alpha values of the six factor in scale were, respectively; for physical relief 0.83, for physical ease 0.71, for psychospiritual ease 0.87, for psychospiritual transcendence 0.85, for environmental transcendence 0.82, and for sociocultural ease 0.61.
Conclusion: HDCS-II is a 5-point likert type and consists of 26 items and 6 factors. This scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to determine comfort of patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adults; chronic illness; instrument development; nurses; renal-urinary

Year:  2021        PMID: 36131697      PMCID: PMC9483229          DOI: 10.1177/17449871211041834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Res Nurs        ISSN: 1744-9871


  18 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Literature Review Toward the Characterization of Comfort.

Authors:  Sara Pinto; Sílvia Caldeira; José Carlos Martins
Journal:  Holist Nurs Pract       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile.

Authors:  A A Kücükdeveci; S P McKenna; S Kutlay; Y Gürsel; D Whalley; T Arasil
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Study of non-compliance among chronic hemodialysis patients and its impact on patients' outcomes.

Authors:  Salwa Ibrahim; Mohammed Hossam; Dawlat Belal
Journal:  Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl       Date:  2015-03

4.  Adherence to diet and fluid restriction of individuals on hemodialysis treatment and affecting factors in Turkey.

Authors:  Dilek Efe; Semra Kocaöz
Journal:  Jpn J Nurs Sci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 1.418

5.  Educational interventions for improved diet and fluid management in haemodialysis patients: An interventional study.

Authors:  Ozlem Bulantekin Duzalan; Sezgi Cinar Pakyuz
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.781

6.  Development of the healing touch comfort questionnaire.

Authors:  Therese Dowd; Katharine Kolcaba; Richard Steiner
Journal:  Holist Nurs Pract       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  "Looking back to my family": indigenous Australian patients' experience of hemodialysis.

Authors:  Kate Anderson; Joan Cunningham; Jeannie Devitt; Cilla Preece; Alan Cass
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  A population-based survey of Chronic REnal Disease In Turkey--the CREDIT study.

Authors:  Gültekin Süleymanlar; Cengiz Utaş; Turgay Arinsoy; Kenan Ateş; Bülent Altun; Mehmet Riza Altiparmak; Tevfik Ecder; Mehmet Emin Yilmaz; Taner Çamsari; Ali Başçi; Ali Riza Odabas; Kamil Serdengeçti
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Treatment adherence and perception in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: a cross - sectional study from Palestine.

Authors:  Karam Sh Naalweh; Mohammad A Barakat; Moutaz W Sweileh; Samah W Al-Jabi; Waleed M Sweileh; Sa'ed H Zyoud
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Dietary and Fluid Regime Adherence in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.

Authors:  Niraj Beerendrakumar; Lakshmi Ramamoorthy; Satish Haridasan
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2018-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.