| Literature DB >> 29637052 |
Niraj Beerendrakumar1, Lakshmi Ramamoorthy1, Satish Haridasan2.
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) needs to modify their lifestyle chiefly focusing on diet and fluid intake as the prognosis of these patients largely depends on adherence to the recommended nutritional regime. Non adherence to the suggested diet and fluids regime leads to rapid worsening of the condition.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic renal failure; Diabetics; Dialysis; Medication adherence
Year: 2018 PMID: 29637052 PMCID: PMC5889793 DOI: 10.15171/jcs.2018.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Caring Sci ISSN: 2251-9920
Sample characteristics
|
|
|
|
| |
| Male | 73 (73) |
| Female | 27 (27) |
|
| |
| 18-20 years | 7 (7) |
| 21-40 years | 29 (29) |
| 41-60 years | 64 (64) |
|
| 14 (14) |
| Married | 86 (86) |
|
| |
| Illiterate | 48 (48) |
| High school | 20 (20) |
| Higher secondary | 15 (15) |
| Under graduate | 13 (13) |
| Post graduate | 4 (4) |
|
| |
| Unemployed | 72 (72) |
| Employed | 28 (28) |
Clinical profile (a) of sample
|
|
|
|
|
| 161.53 (6) | 140 – 174 |
|
| 54.19(10) | 25.5 - 89 |
|
| 20.52(3) | 12 – 34.7 |
| Years of treatment for CKD | 2.15(1) | 0.5 – 10 |
| Dialysis duration in hours | 2.47(1) | 0- 4 |
|
| ||
| For hemodialysis patients | 570.63 | 144 |
| For Non hemodialysis patients | 1344.59(319) | 600-1448 |
| Weight gain (kg) | 1.48 (0.76) | 0.5 – 3 |
|
| ||
| Urea | 92.32(39) | 19-249 |
| Creatinine | 6.64 (3) | 1-25 |
| Sodium | 141.99 (7) | 113-160 |
| Potassium | 4.56 (1) | 3-6.8 |
| Albumin | 4.13 (0.9) | 2.4-5 |
| Calcium | 8.13 (1) | 7-10.4 |
| Hemoglobin | 9.70 (2) | 4.5-14 |
Clinical profile (b) of sample
|
|
|
|
| |
| Smoker | 0 (0) |
| Non smoker | 100 (100) |
|
| |
| Yes | 0 (0) |
| No | 100 (100) |
|
| |
| Absent | 5 (5) |
| Hypertension | 72 (72) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 2 (2) |
| Both hypertension and diabetes mellitus | 21 (21) |
|
| |
| Twice a week | 37 (37) |
| Thrice a week | 26 (26) |
|
| |
| On hemodialysis | 63 (63) |
| Without dialysis | 37 (37) |
|
| |
| Yes | 100 (100) |
|
| |
| Yes | 100 (100) |
|
| |
| Yes | 100 (100) |
Fig. 1
Fig. 2Association of diet adherence level with demographic variables
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.42 | ||||
| 18 – 20 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | |
| 21 – 40 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 2 | |
| 41-60 | 2 | 13 | 45 | 4 | |
|
| 0.71 | ||||
| Male | 4 | 16 | 48 | 5 | |
| Female | 1 | 4 | 21 | 1 | |
|
| 0.02 | ||||
| Illiterate | 0 | 11 | 35 | 2 | |
| High school | 0 | 2 | 15 | 3 | |
| Higher-secondary | 1 | 3 | 10 | 1 | |
| Undergraduate | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | |
| Postgraduate | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
Deviation
Association of fluid adherence level with demographic variables
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| <0.001 | ||||
| 18 – 20 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| 21 – 40 | 0 | 9 | 18 | 2 | |
| 41-60 | 1 | 12 | 47 | 4 | |
|
| 0.40 | ||||
| Male | 1 | 17 | 50 | 5 | |
| Female | 2 | 5 | 19 | 1 | |
|
| <0.001 | ||||
| Illiterate | 0 | 9 | 37 | 2 | |
| High school | 1 | 0 | 16 | 3 | |
| Higher secondary | 2 | 4 | 8 | 1 | |
| Undergraduate | 0 | 6 | 7 | 0 | |
| Postgraduate | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |