Literature DB >> 21945242

Nuclear envelope defects impede a proper response to micronuclear DNA lesions.

Mariona Terradas1, Marta Martín, Laia Hernández, Laura Tusell, Anna Genescà.   

Abstract

When damage is inflicted in nuclear DNA, cells activate a hierarchical plethora of proteins that constitute the DNA damage response machinery. In contrast to the cell nucleus, the ability of micronuclear DNA lesions to activate this complex network is controversial. In order to determine whether the DNA contained in micronuclei is protected by the cellular damage response system, we studied the recruitment of excision repair factors to photolesions inflicted in the DNA of radiation-induced micronuclei. To perform this analysis, primary human dermal fibroblasts were exposed to UV-C light to induce photolesions in nuclear and micronuclear DNA. By means of immunofluorescence techniques, we observed that most micronuclei were devoid of NER factors. We conclude that UV photoproducts in micronuclei are mostly unable to generate an effective DNA damage response. We observed that the micronuclear envelope structure is a determinant factor that influences the repair of the DNA lesions inside micronuclei. Therefore, our results allow us to conclude that photolesions in radiation-induced micronuclei are poorly processed because the repair factors are unable to reach the micronuclear chromatin when a micronucleus is formed or after a genotoxic insult.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21945242     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  25 in total

1.  Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei.

Authors:  Emily M Hatch; Andrew H Fischer; Thomas J Deerinck; Martin W Hetzer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Short- and long-term effects of chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy.

Authors:  Stefano Santaguida; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  The nucleus: keeping it together by keeping it apart.

Authors:  C Patrick Lusk; Megan C King
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 8.382

4.  Ceramide-rich microdomains facilitate nuclear envelope budding for non-conventional exosome formation.

Authors:  Subhash B Arya; Song Chen; Fatima Jordan-Javed; Carole A Parent
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 28.213

5.  Beta Human Papillomavirus 8 E6 Induces Micronucleus Formation and Promotes Chromothripsis.

Authors:  Dalton Dacus; Steven Stancic; Sarah R Pollina; Elizabeth Rifrogiate; Rachel Palinski; Nicholas A Wallace
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 6.549

Review 6.  Nucleosome functions in spindle assembly and nuclear envelope formation.

Authors:  Christian Zierhut; Hironori Funabiki
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 7.  Nuclear envelope rupture: little holes, big openings.

Authors:  Emily M Hatch
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 8.382

8.  Chromoanagenesis and cancer: mechanisms and consequences of localized, complex chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  Andrew J Holland; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Increased mammogram-induced DNA damage in mammary epithelial cells aged in vitro.

Authors:  Laia Hernández; Mariona Terradas; Marta Martín; Purificación Feijoo; David Soler; Laura Tusell; Anna Genescà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Is DNA damage response ready for action anywhere?

Authors:  Mariona Terradas; Marta Martín; Laia Hernández; Laura Tusell; Anna Genescà
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.