Literature DB >> 36127894

Fast and Furious: Energetic Tradeoffs and Scaling of High-Speed Foraging in Rorqual Whales.

William T Gough1, David E Cade1, Max F Czapanskiy1, Jean Potvin2, Frank E Fish3, Shirel R Kahane-Rapport4, Matthew S Savoca1, K C Bierlich5, David W Johnston6, Ari S Friedlaender7, Andy Szabo8, Lars Bejder9,10, Jeremy A Goldbogen1.   

Abstract

Although gigantic body size and obligate filter feeding mechanisms have evolved in multiple vertebrate lineages (mammals and fishes), intermittent ram (lunge) filter feeding is unique to a specific family of baleen whales: rorquals. Lunge feeding is a high cost, high benefit feeding mechanism that requires the integration of unsteady locomotion (i.e., accelerations and maneuvers); the impact of scale on the biomechanics and energetics of this foraging mode continues to be the subject of intense study. The goal of our investigation was to use a combination of multi-sensor tags paired with UAS footage to determine the impact of morphometrics such as body size on kinematic lunging parameters such as fluking timing, maximum lunging speed, and deceleration during the engulfment period for a range of species from minke to blue whales. Our results show that, in the case of krill-feeding lunges and regardless of size, animals exhibit a skewed gradient between powered and fully unpowered engulfment, with fluking generally ending at the point of both the maximum lunging speed and mouth opening. In all cases, the small amounts of propulsive thrust generated by the tail were unable to overcome the high drag forces experienced during engulfment. Assuming this thrust to be minimal, we predicted the minimum speed of lunging across scale. To minimize the energetic cost of lunge feeding, hydrodynamic theory predicts slower lunge feeding speeds regardless of body size, with a lower boundary set by the ability of the prey to avoid capture. We used empirical data to test this theory and instead found that maximum foraging speeds remain constant and high (∼4 m s-1) across body size, even as higher speeds result in lower foraging efficiency. Regardless, we found an increasing relationship between body size and this foraging efficiency, estimated as the ratio of energetic gain from prey to energetic cost. This trend held across timescales ranging from a single lunge to a single day and suggests that larger whales are capturing more prey-and more energy-at a lower cost.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36127894      PMCID: PMC9475666          DOI: 10.1093/iob/obac038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Org Biol        ISSN: 2517-4843


  43 in total

1.  The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 2.  The evolution of foraging capacity and gigantism in cetaceans.

Authors:  J A Goldbogen; P T Madsen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Determining forward speed from accelerometer jiggle in aquatic environments.

Authors:  David E Cade; Kelly R Barr; John Calambokidis; Ari S Friedlaender; Jeremy A Goldbogen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Feeding anatomy, filter-feeding rate, and diet of whale sharks Rhincodon typus during surface ram filter feeding off the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.

Authors:  Philip J Motta; Michael Maslanka; Robert E Hueter; Ray L Davis; Rafael de la Parra; Samantha L Mulvany; Maria Laura Habegger; James A Strother; Kyle R Mara; Jayne M Gardiner; John P Tyminski; Leslie D Zeigler
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Behaviour and kinematics of continuous ram filtration in bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus).

Authors:  Malene Simon; Mark Johnson; Peter Tyack; Peter T Madsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Context-dependent lateralized feeding strategies in blue whales.

Authors:  Ari S Friedlaender; James E Herbert-Read; Elliott L Hazen; David E Cade; John Calambokidis; Brandon L Southall; Alison K Stimpert; Jeremy A Goldbogen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Hydrodynamic performance of the minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) flipper.

Authors:  Lisa Noelle Cooper; Nils Sedano; Stig Johansson; Bryan May; Joey D Brown; Casey M Holliday; Brian W Kot; Frank E Fish
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Passive versus active engulfment: verdict from trajectory simulations of lunge-feeding fin whales Balaenoptera physalus.

Authors:  J Potvin; J A Goldbogen; R E Shadwick
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Biomechanics of predator-prey arms race in lion, zebra, cheetah and impala.

Authors:  Alan M Wilson; Tatjana Y Hubel; Simon D Wilshin; John C Lowe; Maja Lorenc; Oliver P Dewhirst; Hattie L A Bartlam-Brooks; Rebecca Diack; Emily Bennitt; Krystyna A Golabek; Roger C Woledge; J Weldon McNutt; Nancy A Curtin; Timothy G West
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Extreme bradycardia and tachycardia in the world's largest animal.

Authors:  J A Goldbogen; D E Cade; J Calambokidis; M F Czapanskiy; J Fahlbusch; A S Friedlaender; W T Gough; S R Kahane-Rapport; M S Savoca; K V Ponganis; P J Ponganis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.